• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国卵胞浆内单精子注射的使用趋势。

Trends in the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the United States.

作者信息

Jain Tarun, Gupta Ruchi S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 19;357(3):251-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa070707.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMsa070707
PMID:17634460
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was initially developed as part of in vitro fertilization (IVF) to treat male-factor infertility. However, despite the added cost, uncertain efficacy, and potential risks of ICSI, its use has been extended to include some patients without documented male-factor infertility.

METHODS

We analyzed national data on assisted reproductive technology reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to determine temporal trends in the use of ICSI and IVF in the United States, and we examined differences in the use of ICSI between states with and those without mandated insurance coverage.

RESULTS

From 1995 to 2004, the number of fertility clinics and fresh-embryo cycles and the rates of IVF-related pregnancies and live births increased. The percentage of IVF cycles with the use of ICSI also increased dramatically (from 11.0% to 57.5%), while the percentage of diagnoses of infertility attributed to male-factor conditions remained stable. The ratio of ICSI procedures to diagnoses of male-factor infertility steadily increased each year, suggesting an increasing use of ICSI for conditions other than male-factor infertility. From 1999 to 2004, there was an increasing use of ICSI relative to the percentage of patients with male-factor infertility in states with and those without mandated insurance coverage. For any given year, however, states with insurance coverage had a higher ratio of ICSI use to diagnoses of male-factor infertility than did states without insurance coverage (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Since 1995, the use of ICSI in the United States has increased dramatically, while the proportion of patients receiving treatment for male-factor infertility has remained stable. State-mandated health insurance coverage for IVF services is associated with greater use of ICSI for infertility that is not attributed to male-factor conditions.

摘要

背景

胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)最初是作为体外受精(IVF)的一部分开发出来,用于治疗男性因素导致的不孕症。然而,尽管ICSI成本增加、疗效不确定且存在潜在风险,但其应用范围已扩大到包括一些无男性因素不孕症记录的患者。

方法

我们分析了向疾病控制与预防中心报告的辅助生殖技术的全国数据,以确定美国ICSI和IVF使用的时间趋势,并研究了有强制保险覆盖州和无强制保险覆盖州在ICSI使用上的差异。

结果

1995年至2004年,生育诊所数量、新鲜胚胎周期数以及与IVF相关的妊娠率和活产率均有所增加。使用ICSI的IVF周期百分比也大幅上升(从11.0%升至57.5%),而归因于男性因素的不孕症诊断百分比保持稳定。ICSI操作与男性因素不孕症诊断的比例逐年稳步上升,这表明ICSI在男性因素不孕症以外的情况中的使用越来越多。1999年至2004年,在有和没有强制保险覆盖的州,相对于男性因素不孕症患者的百分比,ICSI的使用都在增加。然而,在任何给定年份,有保险覆盖的州ICSI使用与男性因素不孕症诊断的比例高于无保险覆盖的州(P<0.001)。

结论

自1995年以来,美国ICSI的使用大幅增加,而接受男性因素不孕症治疗的患者比例保持稳定。州强制规定的IVF服务医疗保险覆盖与将ICSI更多地用于非男性因素导致的不孕症有关。

相似文献

1
Trends in the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the United States.美国卵胞浆内单精子注射的使用趋势。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 19;357(3):251-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa070707.
2
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection use in states with and without insurance coverage mandates for infertility treatment, United States, 2000-2015.2000-2015 年美国有和没有保险覆盖要求的州的胞浆内单精子注射应用于不孕治疗的情况。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Apr;109(4):691-697. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.027. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
3
Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection.卵胞浆内单精子注射的使用趋势及相关生殖结局
JAMA. 2015 Jan 20;313(3):255-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17985.
4
Use and outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-male factor infertility.非男性因素不孕症的卵胞浆内单精子注射的应用及结局
Fertil Steril. 2007 Sep;88(3):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.013. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
5
[Twenty years of in vitro fertilization: realization and questions for the future].[体外受精二十年:成就与未来之问]
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2001;63(3):193-240; discussion 240-1.
6
Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization.体外受精的保险覆盖范围及结果
N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 29;347(9):661-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa013491.
7
Trends in the use of intracytoplasmatic sperm injection marked variability between countries.胞浆内单精子注射技术的使用趋势在不同国家间存在显著差异。
Hum Reprod Update. 2008 Nov-Dec;14(6):593-604. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn032. Epub 2008 Aug 16.
8
Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.保险授权与不孕症治疗趋势。
Fertil Steril. 2008 Jan;89(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.167. Epub 2007 May 7.
9
Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States.美国胚胎移植实践及辅助生殖技术使用结果的趋势。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 15;350(16):1639-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa032073.
10
Conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with borderline semen: a randomized study using sibling oocytes.精液质量临界患者常规体外受精与卵胞浆内单精子注射的比较:一项使用姐妹卵母细胞的随机研究。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Feb;85(2):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.077.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the outcomes of patients with non-male factor infertility and poor ovarian response undergoing in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.非男性因素不孕且卵巢反应不良患者接受体外受精和卵胞浆内单精子注射的结局比较
J Int Med Res. 2025 Jul;53(7):3000605251359470. doi: 10.1177/03000605251359470. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
2
Current and Future Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose and Treat Male Infertility.人工智能在男性不育诊断和治疗中的当前及未来应用
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025;1469:1-23. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-82990-1_1.
3
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilization in unexplained infertility.
不明原因不孕症中卵胞浆内单精子注射与传统体外受精的比较
F S Rep. 2024 Jun 19;5(3):263-271. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.06.003. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro insemination in couples with non-male infertility factor in the 'real-world' setting: analysis of the HFEA registry.非男性因素不孕夫妇在“真实世界”环境中采用胞浆内单精子注射与常规体外受精的比较:HFEA 注册研究分析。
J Transl Med. 2024 Jul 28;22(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05515-x.
5
Preimplantation genetic testing in the current era, a review.当前时代的植入前基因检测,一篇综述。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):1787-1799. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07370-z. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
6
Comparison Fertilization Outcomes between DouStim and Minimal Stimulation Protocols in Poor Ovarian Responders: A Randomized Clinical Trial.卵巢反应不良患者中DouStim方案与微刺激方案的受精结局比较:一项随机临床试验
Int J Fertil Steril. 2024 Feb 2;18(2):135-139. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2023.552687.1293.
7
Is It Time for Andrology and Endocrinology Professionals in Assisted Reproduction Centers?辅助生殖中心的男科与内分泌科专业人员的时代到了吗?
World J Mens Health. 2023 Oct;41(4):796-808. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.220253. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
8
The bibliometric analysis of studies on intracytoplasmic sperm injection from 2002 to 2021.2002 年至 2021 年卵胞浆内单精子注射研究的文献计量分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 14;14:1109623. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1109623. eCollection 2023.
9
Bibliometric analysis and visualization of literature on assisted reproduction technology.辅助生殖技术文献的文献计量分析与可视化
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 1;9:1063040. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1063040. eCollection 2022.
10
Microsurgical Management of Male Infertility: Compelling Evidence That Collaboration with Qualified Male Reproductive Urologists Enhances Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Outcomes.男性不育的显微外科治疗:与合格的男性生殖泌尿科医生合作可提高辅助生殖技术(ART)成功率的有力证据。
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 6;11(15):4593. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154593.