Mannix Lisa K, Savani Naren, Landy Steve, Valade Dominique, Shackelford Steve, Ames Michael H, Jones Martin W
Headache Associates, 7908 Cincinnati-Dayton Road, West Chester, OH 45069, USA.
Headache. 2007 Jul-Aug;47(7):1037-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00855.x.
In a pilot study, naratriptan was significantly more effective than placebo in preventing menstrually related migraine (MRM) when given as 1 mg twice daily for 5 days beginning 2 days before the predicted onset of MRM for up to 4 menstrual cycles.
To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of naratriptan for short-term prevention of MRM in 2 large, identically designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies.
MRM was defined as any migraine beginning during the perimenstrual period (PMP). By definition, the PMP consisted of Days -2, -1, 1, 2, 3, and 4, with Day 1 being the first day of menstrual flow. Adult women were eligible if they reported a history of MRM, had regular menstrual cycles, and could predict within 2 days both the onset of menstrual flow and MRM. The studies comprised a baseline phase and a treatment phase. During the baseline phase, patients prophylactically treated their first PMP after the screening visit with single-blind placebo. Patients who documented an MRM while receiving placebo were eligible for the treatment phase. During the treatment phase, patients were randomized to receive either naratriptan 1 mg twice daily or placebo beginning 3 days before the predicted onset of MRM for a total of 6 days for 4 PMPs or 6 months, whichever occurred sooner. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean percentage of treated PMPs without MRM per patient. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the percentage of patients who were free of MRM during all treated PMPs, the median number of days with MRM over 4 PMPs, and patient satisfaction. Safety and tolerability measures included adverse events, standard clinical laboratory tests, and vital signs.
The intent-to-treat population was 287 in Study 1 (149 in the naratriptan group and 138 in the placebo group) and 346 in Study 2 (173 in each treatment group). Approximately 20% of randomized patients in each treatment group in Study 1 and 10% in each treatment group in Study 2 withdrew prematurely from the studies over the 4-month treatment period. The mean percentage of PMPs without MRM per patient was 38% and 34% among naratriptan-treated patients treating at least 1 PMP compared with 29% and 24% among placebo-treated patients in each respective study (P < .05 naratriptan vs placebo for both studies). Efficacy of naratriptan did not vary as a function of age, use of oral contraceptives, or use of migraine prophylaxis. More patients who had received naratriptan reported attacks posttreatment compared to patients who had received placebo. Among patients treating at least 1 PMP, the percentage of patients with no MRM in any treated PMP was significantly (P < .05) higher in the naratriptan group (11%; 19/173) than the placebo group (3%; 6 of 173) in Study 2. There were no differences in the percentages of patients with no MRM in any treated PMP in Study 1. The number of MRM days per patient across 4 PMPs was significantly lower in the naratriptan group than in the placebo group in both studies (median 5.0 days vs 6.5 days in Study 1 [P= .005] and 5.3 days vs 6.0 days in Study 2 [P= .018]). Significantly more patients receiving naratriptan were satisfied with the ability of naratriptan to control MRM either by preventing their occurrence or reducing their severity or duration compared with patients receiving placebo. No single drug-related adverse event was reported by more than 2% of patients in a treatment group in either study, and no serious drug-related adverse events were reported.
Naratriptan 1 mg twice daily for 6 days per month is effective and well tolerated when used for short-term prevention of MRM. More patients receiving naratriptan than placebo were satisfied with treatment. The observed increase in posttreatment attacks needs further study.
在一项初步研究中,那拉曲普坦在预测的月经相关性偏头痛(MRM)发作前2天开始,每天两次服用1毫克,持续5天,长达4个月经周期,预防MRM的效果显著优于安慰剂。
在两项大型、设计相同、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究中,评估那拉曲普坦短期预防MRM的疗效和耐受性。
MRM定义为围经期(PMP)期间开始的任何偏头痛。根据定义,PMP包括第-2、-1、1、2、3和4天,第1天为月经来潮的第一天。成年女性如果报告有MRM病史、月经周期规律,并且能够在2天内预测月经来潮和MRM的发作,则符合入选条件。研究包括基线期和治疗期。在基线期,患者在筛查访视后的第一个PMP期间接受单盲安慰剂预防性治疗。在接受安慰剂治疗期间记录有MRM的患者有资格进入治疗期。在治疗期,患者被随机分配,从预测的MRM发作前3天开始,每天两次服用1毫克那拉曲普坦或安慰剂,共6天,用于4个PMP或6个月,以先发生者为准。主要疗效终点是每位患者治疗的PMP中无MRM的平均百分比。次要疗效终点包括在所有治疗的PMP期间无MRM的患者百分比、4个PMP期间MRM的中位数天数以及患者满意度。安全性和耐受性指标包括不良事件、标准临床实验室检查和生命体征。
研究1的意向性治疗人群为287人(那拉曲普坦组149人,安慰剂组138人),研究2为346人(每个治疗组173人)。在4个月的治疗期内,研究1中每个治疗组约20%的随机分组患者和研究2中每个治疗组10%的患者提前退出研究。在每项研究中,与安慰剂治疗的患者相比,那拉曲普坦治疗的至少治疗1个PMP的患者中,每个患者无MRM的PMP的平均百分比分别为38%和34%,而安慰剂治疗的患者分别为29%和24%(两项研究中那拉曲普坦与安慰剂相比,P <.05)。那拉曲普坦的疗效不因年龄、口服避孕药的使用或偏头痛预防性用药的使用而有所不同。与接受安慰剂的患者相比,接受那拉曲普坦治疗的患者报告治疗后发作的更多。在研究2中,在至少治疗1个PMP的患者中,那拉曲普坦组在任何治疗的PMP中无MRM的患者百分比(11%;19/173)显著高于安慰剂组(3%;173人中的6人)(P <.05)。在研究1中,在任何治疗的PMP中无MRM的患者百分比没有差异。在两项研究中那拉曲普坦组每位患者4个PMP期间的MRM天数均显著低于安慰剂组(研究1中中位数为5.0天对6.5天[P =.005],研究二中为5.3天对6.0天[P =.018])。与接受安慰剂的患者相比,接受那拉曲普坦治疗的患者对那拉曲普坦通过预防发作或减轻其严重程度或持续时间来控制MRM的能力更满意。在任何一项研究中,治疗组中超过2%的患者未报告任何单一的药物相关不良事件,也未报告严重的药物相关不良事件。
每月每天两次服用1毫克那拉曲普坦,持续6天,用于短期预防MRM有效且耐受性良好。接受那拉曲普坦治疗的患者比接受安慰剂治疗的患者对治疗更满意。治疗后发作增加的现象需要进一步研究。