van Tulder M W, Jellema P, van Poppel M N M, Nachemson A L, Bouter L M
VU University Medical Centre, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081 BT.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(2):CD001823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001823.pub2.
Lumbar supports are used in the treatment of low back pain patients to make the impairment and disability vanish or decrease. Lumbar supports are also used to prevent the onset of low back pain (primary prevention) or to prevent recurrences of a low back pain episode (secondary prevention).
The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effects of lumbar supports for prevention and treatment of non-specific low back pain.
We searched the Medline, Cinahl and Current Contents databases and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to September 1999, and the Embase database up to September 1998. We also screened references given in relevant reviews and identified controlled trials, and used Science Citation Index to identify additional controlled trials.
Controlled clinical trials that reported on any type of lumbar supports as preventive or therapeutic intervention for non-specific low back pain were included.
One author extracted data from the trials considering characteristics of the study population, characteristics of the interventions and the final results for each outcome measure. The author compared these findings to data regarding the same characteristics of the same studies published already in other reviews. The methodological quality was independently assessed by two authors. Because it was not possible to perform a quantitative analysis, a qualitative meta-analysis was performed in which the strength of evidence on the effectiveness of lumbar supports was classified as being strong, moderate, limited or conflicting, and no evidence.
Five randomized and two nonrandomized controlled preventive trials and six randomized therapeutic trials were included in our review. Overall the methodological quality of the studies included in our review was rather low. Only four of the thirteen studies scored positive on 50% or more of the the internal validity items. There was moderate evidence that for primary prevention lumbar supports are not more effective than other types of treatment or no intervention. No evidence was found on the effectiveness of lumbar supports for secondary prevention. The systematic review of therapeutic trials showed that there is limited evidence that lumbar supports are more effective than no treatment, while it is still unclear if lumbar supports are more effective than other interventions for treatment of low back pain.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is still a need for high quality randomised trials on the effectiveness of lumbar supports. One of the most essential issues to tackle in these future trials seems to be the realisation of an adequate compliance.
腰部支撑器具用于治疗腰痛患者,以使损伤和残疾消失或减轻。腰部支撑器具还用于预防腰痛的发作(一级预防)或预防腰痛发作的复发(二级预防)。
本系统评价的目的是评估腰部支撑器具对非特异性腰痛的预防和治疗效果。
我们检索了截至1999年9月的Medline、Cinahl和Current Contents数据库以及Cochrane对照试验注册库,以及截至1998年9月的Embase数据库。我们还筛选了相关综述中给出的参考文献并识别对照试验,并使用科学引文索引识别其他对照试验。
纳入报告任何类型腰部支撑器具作为非特异性腰痛的预防或治疗干预措施的对照临床试验。
一位作者从试验中提取数据,考虑研究人群的特征、干预措施的特征以及每个结局指标的最终结果。作者将这些发现与其他综述中已发表的关于同一研究相同特征的数据进行比较。方法学质量由两位作者独立评估。由于无法进行定量分析,因此进行了定性荟萃分析,其中将腰部支撑器具有效性的证据强度分类为强、中、有限或矛盾,以及无证据。
我们的综述纳入了五项随机和两项非随机对照预防试验以及六项随机治疗试验。总体而言,我们综述中纳入的研究的方法学质量相当低。在十三项研究中,只有四项在50%或更多的内部效度项目上得分呈阳性。有中等证据表明,对于一级预防,腰部支撑器具并不比其他类型的治疗或不干预更有效。未发现腰部支撑器具用于二级预防有效性的证据。治疗试验的系统评价表明,仅有有限证据表明腰部支撑器具比不治疗更有效,而腰部支撑器具是否比其他干预措施更有效地治疗腰痛仍不清楚。
仍需要高质量的随机试验来研究腰部支撑器具的有效性。在这些未来试验中要解决的最关键问题之一似乎是实现足够的依从性。