Ersser S J, Latter S, Sibley A, Satherley P A, Welbourne S
Bournemouth University, Institute of Health & Community Studies, Royal London House, Christchurch Road, Bournemouth, Hampshire, UK, BH1 3LT.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD004054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004054.pub2.
Psychological and educational interventions have been used as an adjunct to conventional therapy for children with atopic eczema to enhance the effectiveness of topical therapy. There have been no relevant systematic reviews applicable to children.
To assess the effectiveness of psychological and educational interventions in changing outcomes for children with atopic eczema.
We searched the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register (to September 2004), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (from 1966-2005), EMBASE (from 1980 to week 3, 2005 ), PsycINFO (from 1872 to week 1, 2005). On-line: National Research Register, Meta-register of Controlled Trials, ZETOC alerts, SIGLE (August 2005).
RCTs of psychological or educational interventions, or both, used to manage children with atopic eczema.
Two authors independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed trial quality and extracted data. A lack of comparable data prevented data synthesis.
Five RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Some included studies required clearer reporting of trial procedures. Rigorous established outcome measures were not always used. Interventions described in all 5 RCTs were adjuncts to conventional therapy. Four focused on intervention directed towards the parents; data synthesis was not possible. Psychological interventions remain virtually unevaluated by studies of robust design; the only included study examined the effect of relaxation techniques (hypnotherapy and biofeedback) on severity. Three educational studies identified significant improvements in disease severity between intervention groups. A recent German trial evaluated long term outcomes and found significant improvements in both disease severity (3 months to 7 years, p=0.0002, 8 to 12 years, p=0.003, 13 to 18 years, p=0.0001) and parental quality of life (3 months to 7 years, p=0.0001, 8 to 12 years p=0.002), for children with atopic eczema. One study found video-based education more effective in improving severity than direct education and the control (discussion) (p<0.001). The single psychological study found relaxation techniques improved clinical severity as compared to the control at 20 weeks (t=2.13) but this was of borderline significance (p=0.042).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: A lack of rigorously designed trials (excluding one recent German study) provides only limited evidence of the effectiveness of educational and psychological interventions in helping to manage the condition of children with atopic eczema. Evidence from included studies and also adult studies indicates that different service delivery models (multi-professional eczema school and nurse-led clinics) require further and comparative evaluation to examine their cost-effectiveness and suitability for different health systems.
心理和教育干预已被用作特应性皮炎患儿传统治疗的辅助手段,以提高局部治疗的效果。目前尚无适用于儿童的相关系统评价。
评估心理和教育干预对改善特应性皮炎患儿治疗效果的有效性。
我们检索了Cochrane皮肤组专业注册库(截至2004年9月)、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2005年第2期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2005年)、EMBASE(1980年至2005年第3周)、PsycINFO(1872年至2005年第1周)。在线资源:国家研究注册库、对照试验元注册库、ZETOC警报、SIGLE(2005年8月)。
用于治疗特应性皮炎患儿的心理或教育干预或两者结合的随机对照试验。
两位作者独立应用入选标准、评估试验质量并提取数据。由于缺乏可比数据,无法进行数据综合分析。
五项随机对照试验符合纳入标准。一些纳入研究需要更清晰地报告试验程序。并非总是使用严格确立的结局指标。所有五项随机对照试验中描述的干预措施均为传统治疗的辅助手段。四项研究侧重于针对家长的干预;无法进行数据综合分析。心理干预在设计严谨的研究中几乎未得到评估;唯一纳入的研究考察了放松技术(催眠疗法和生物反馈)对病情严重程度的影响。三项教育研究发现干预组的疾病严重程度有显著改善。最近一项德国试验评估了长期结局,发现特应性皮炎患儿的疾病严重程度(3个月至7岁,p = 0.0002;8至12岁,p = 0.003;13至18岁,p = 0.0001)和家长生活质量(3个月至7岁,p = 0.0001;8至12岁,p = 0.002)均有显著改善。一项研究发现,基于视频的教育在改善病情严重程度方面比直接教育和对照组(讨论)更有效(p < 0.001)。唯一的心理研究发现,与对照组相比,放松技术在20周时改善了临床严重程度(t = 2.13),但这一结果具有边缘显著性(p = 0.042)。
缺乏严谨设计的试验(不包括最近一项德国研究)仅提供了有限的证据,证明教育和心理干预有助于管理特应性皮炎患儿病情的有效性。纳入研究以及成人研究的证据表明,不同的服务提供模式(多专业湿疹学校和护士主导的诊所)需要进一步的比较评估,以检验其成本效益以及对不同卫生系统的适用性。