Nield L, Moore H J, Hooper L, Cruickshank J K, Vyas A, Whittaker V, Summerbell C D
University of Teesside, Parkside West Offices, Middlesbrough, U K, TS1 3BA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD004097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004097.pub4.
While initial dietary management immediately after formal diagnosis is an 'accepted' cornerstone of treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, a formal and systematic overview of its efficacy and method of delivery is not currently available.
To assess the effects of type and frequency of different types of dietary advice for adults with type 2 diabetes.
We carried out a comprehensive search of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, bibliographies and contacted relevant experts.
All randomised controlled trials, of six months or longer, in which dietary advice was the main intervention.
The lead investigator performed all data extraction and quality scoring with duplication being carried out by one of the other six investigators independently with discrepancies resolved by discussion and consensus. Authors were contacted for missing data.
Thirty-six articles reporting a total of eighteen trials following 1467 participants were included. Dietary approaches assessed in this review were low-fat/high-carbohydrate diets, high-fat/low-carbohydrate diets, low-calorie (1000 kcal per day) and very-low-calorie (500 kcal per day) diets and modified fat diets. Two trials compared the American Diabetes Association exchange diet with a standard reduced fat diet and five studies assessed low-fat diets versus moderate fat or low-carbohydrate diets. Two studies assessed the effect of a very-low-calorie diet versus a low-calorie diet. Six studies compared dietary advice with dietary advice plus exercise and three other studies assessed dietary advice versus dietary advice plus behavioural approaches. The studies all measured weight and measures of glycaemic control although not all studies reported these in the articles published. Other outcomes which were measured in these studies included mortality, blood pressure, serum cholesterol (including LDL and HDL cholesterol), serum triglycerides, maximal exercise capacity and compliance. The results suggest that adoption of regular exercise is a good way to promote better glycaemic control in type 2 diabetic patients, however all of these studies were at high risk of bias.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There are no high quality data on the efficacy of the dietary treatment of type 2 diabetes, however the data available indicate that the adoption of exercise appears to improve glycated haemoglobin at six and twelve months in people with type 2 diabetes. There is an urgent need for well-designed studies which examine a range of interventions, at various points during follow-up, although there is a promising study currently underway.
虽然正式诊断后立即进行的初始饮食管理是2型糖尿病治疗的一个“公认”基石,但目前尚无关于其疗效和实施方法的正式系统综述。
评估不同类型饮食建议对2型糖尿病成年人的类型和频率的影响。
我们对Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、AMED进行了全面检索,并查阅了参考文献,还联系了相关专家。
所有为期六个月或更长时间的随机对照试验,其中饮食建议为主要干预措施。
首席研究员进行所有数据提取和质量评分,另外六名研究员之一独立进行重复操作,如有差异通过讨论和协商解决。如有缺失数据则联系作者。
纳入了36篇文章,共报告了18项试验,涉及1467名参与者。本综述中评估的饮食方法包括低脂/高碳水化合物饮食、高脂/低碳水化合物饮食、低热量(每天1000千卡)和极低热量(每天500千卡)饮食以及改良脂肪饮食。两项试验将美国糖尿病协会交换饮食与标准低脂饮食进行了比较,五项研究评估了低脂饮食与中等脂肪或低碳水化合物饮食。两项研究评估了极低热量饮食与低热量饮食的效果。六项研究将饮食建议与饮食建议加运动进行了比较,另外三项研究评估了饮食建议与饮食建议加行为方法。这些研究均测量了体重和血糖控制指标,尽管并非所有研究都在发表的文章中报告了这些指标。这些研究中测量的其他结果包括死亡率、血压、血清胆固醇(包括低密度脂蛋白和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇)、血清甘油三酯、最大运动能力和依从性。结果表明,进行规律运动是促进改善2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的好方法,然而所有这些研究都存在较高的偏倚风险。
目前尚无关于2型糖尿病饮食治疗疗效的高质量数据,但现有数据表明,进行运动似乎能在6个月和12个月时改善2型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白水平。迫切需要设计良好的研究,在随访的不同时间点检查一系列干预措施,尽管目前有一项很有前景的研究正在进行中。