Department of Oral Biology, Hebrew University-Hadassah Faculty of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
Inflammopharmacology. 1999;7(3):207-17. doi: 10.1007/s10787-999-0004-1.
The paper discusses the principal evidence that supports the concept that cell and tissue injury in infectious and post-infectious and inflammatory sequelae might involve a deleterious synergistic interaction among microbial- and host-derived pro-inflammatory agonists. Experimental models had proposed that a rapid cell and tissue injury might be induced by combinations among subtoxic amounts of three major groups of agonists generated both by microorganisms and by the host's own defense systems. These include: (1) oxidants: Superoxide, H(2)O(2), OH', oxidants generated by xanthine-xanthine-oxidase, ROO; HOC1, NO, OONO'-, (2) the membrane-injuring and perforating agents, microbial hemolysins, phospholipases A(2) and C, lysophosphatides, bactericidal cationic proteins, fatty acids, bile salts and the attack complex of complement a, certain xenobics and (3) the highly cationic proteinases, elastase and cathepsin G, as well as collagenase, plasmin, trypsin and a variety of microbial proteinases. Cell killing by combinations among the various agonists also results in the release of membrane-associated arachidonate and metabolites. Cell damage might be further enhanced by certain cytokines either acting directly on targets or through their capacity to prime phagocytes to generate excessive amounts of oxidants. The microbial cell wall components, lipoteichoic acid (LTA), lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and peptidoglycan (PPG), released following bacteriolysis, induced either by cationic proteins from neutrophils and eosinophils or by beta lactam antibiotics, are potent activators of macrophages which can release oxidants, cytolytic cytokines and NO. The microbial cell wall components can also activate the cascades of coagulation, complement and fibrinolysis. All these cascades might further synergize with microbial toxins and metabolites and with phagocyte-derived agonsits to amplify tissue damage and to induce septic shock, multiple organ failure, 'flesh-eating' syndromes, etc. The long persistence of non-biodegradable bacterial cell wall components within activated macrophages in granulomatous inflammation might be the result of the inactivation by oxidants and proteinases of bacterial autolytic wall enzymes (muramidases). The unsuccessful attempts in recent clinical trials to prevent septic shock by the administration of single antagonists is disconcerting. It does suggest however that, since tissue damage in post-infectious syndromes is most probably the end result of synergistic interactions among a multiplicity of agents, only agents which might depress bacteriolysis in vivo and 'cocktails' of appropriate antagonists, but not single antagonists, if administered at the early phases of infection especially to patients at high risk, might help to control the development of post-infectious syndromes. However, the use of adequate predictive markers for sepsis and other post-infectious complications is highly desirable. Although it is conceivable that anti-inflammatory strategies might also be counter-productive as they might act as 'double-edge swords', intensive investigations to devise combination therapies are warranted. The present review also lists the major anti-inflammatory agents and strategies and combinations among them which have been proposed in the last few years for clinical treatments of sepsis and other post-infectious complications.
本文讨论了主要证据,支持这样一种概念,即感染、感染后和炎症后遗症中的细胞和组织损伤可能涉及微生物和宿主来源的促炎激动剂之间有害的协同相互作用。实验模型提出,快速的细胞和组织损伤可能是由三种主要的激动剂组合引起的,这些激动剂既来自微生物,也来自宿主自身的防御系统。这些激动剂包括:(1)氧化剂:超氧阴离子、H2O2、OH'、黄嘌呤氧化酶产生的氧化剂、ROO;HOC1、NO、OONO',(2)破坏和穿孔剂,微生物溶血素、磷脂酶 A2 和 C、溶血磷脂、杀菌阳离子蛋白、脂肪酸、胆盐和补体 a 的攻击复合物、某些外源性物质,(3)高度阳离子蛋白酶,弹性蛋白酶和组织蛋白酶 G,以及胶原酶、纤溶酶和各种微生物蛋白酶。各种激动剂之间的组合也会导致细胞膜相关花生四烯酸和代谢物的释放,从而导致细胞杀伤。某些细胞因子可能通过直接作用于靶标或通过使吞噬细胞产生过量氧化剂来增强细胞损伤。微生物细胞壁成分,脂磷壁酸(LTA)、脂多糖(LPS)和肽聚糖(PPG),在中性粒细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞的阳离子蛋白或β内酰胺类抗生素诱导的细菌溶解后被释放,是巨噬细胞的有效激活剂,巨噬细胞可以释放氧化剂、细胞毒性细胞因子和 NO。微生物细胞壁成分还可以激活凝血、补体和纤维蛋白溶解级联反应。所有这些级联反应都可能与微生物毒素和代谢物以及吞噬细胞衍生的激动剂进一步协同作用,放大组织损伤并引发败血症性休克、多器官衰竭、“食肉”综合征等。在肉芽肿性炎症中,活性巨噬细胞内不可生物降解的细菌细胞壁成分的长期存在,可能是由于氧化剂和蛋白酶使细菌自溶壁酶(黏肽酶)失活的结果。最近临床试验中试图通过单一拮抗剂预防败血症性休克的尝试失败令人不安。但这确实表明,由于感染后综合征中的组织损伤很可能是多种因子协同作用的最终结果,只有那些可能抑制体内细菌溶解作用的因子,以及在感染早期,特别是对高危患者,给予适当的拮抗剂“鸡尾酒”,而不是单一拮抗剂,才可能有助于控制感染后综合征的发展。然而,高度需要使用适当的败血症和其他感染后并发症的预测标志物。尽管抗炎策略也可能适得其反,因为它们可能是“双刃剑”,但有必要进行深入研究,设计联合治疗方案。本文还列出了过去几年中提出的用于治疗败血症和其他感染后并发症的主要抗炎药物和策略及其组合。