Suppr超能文献

长期透析治疗患者永久性颈静脉导管植入术:十年经验

Implantation of permanent jugular catheters in patients on regular dialysis treatment: ten years' experience.

作者信息

Ervo S, Cavatorta F, Zollo A

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, General Hospital, Imperia - Italy.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2001 Apr-Jun;2(2):68-72. doi: 10.1177/112972980100200209.

Abstract

Dual-lumen cuffed central venous catheter proved an important alternative vascular access compared to conventional arteriovenous (Cimino-Brescia) shunt in a selected group of patients on regular dialysis treatment. Typically, these catheters are used as bridging access, until fistula or graft is ready for use, or as permanent access when an arteriovenous fistula or graft is not planned (NKF-DOQI). We conducted a prospective study on IJV permanent catheter insertion and its related earlier and long-term complications. From February 1991 to February 2001 we inserted in 124 patients in end stage renal disease 135 cuffed catheters (130 in the right IJV and 5 in the left IJV), 92 of which were Permcath, 27 Vascath, and 16 Ash-Split. We performed the insertion of catheters by puncturing the IJV under ultrasonographic guid-ance in the lower side of the Sedillot triangle and checking the accurate position of the tip by endocavitary electrocardiography (EC-ECG). The duration of catheter use was from 60 to 1460 days, mean 345 days. The actuarial survival rate at 1 year was 82%, at 2 years 56%, at 3 years 42% and at 4 years 20%. The exit site infection and septicemia rates were 5.2 and 2.86 per 1000 catheter days respectively. Catheter sepsis was implicated in the death of three patients, all of whom had multiple medical problems. Several episodes of thrombosis (6% of dialyses) occurred which required urokinase treatment, and catheter replacement in 12 patients (9.6%). In 3 cases the catheters were displaced and correct repositioning was performed. Two catheters (Ash-Split) were replaced due to accidental damage of the external portion of catheters (alcoholic disinfectant). Catheter tip embolism occurred on one occasion during elective catheter exchange over guide-wire. One of the common problems encountered with cuffed tunneled catheters is poor blood flow, most often secondary to the formation of a fibrin sheath around the lumen. Even if we conducted a non-randomized study, in our experience, the higher rate of malfunctioning catheters was in the group with no anticoagulation therapy. Therefore, we suggest anticoagulation treatment in all patients wearing central vascular catheters with no contraindication. Just one year ago, we followed NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access that indicated that for patients who have a primary AV fistula maturing, but need im-mediate hemodialysis, tunneled cuffed catheters are the access of choice and the preferred insertion site is the right IJV. Considering recent reports of permanent central venous stenosis or occlusion after IJV can-nulation, currently, our first choice is femoral vein cannulation with smooth silicone rubber catheters, tunneled if long-term utilization is needed (more the 3-4 weeks). In our opinion, the right IJV puncture is to be avoided as much as the venipuncture of arm veins suitable for vascular access placement, particularly the cephalic vein of the non-dominant arm. Our data confirm that permanent venous catheters might rep-resent an effective long-term vascular access for chronic hemodialysis, particularly for older patients with cardiovascular disease and for cancer patients.

摘要

对于接受定期透析治疗的特定患者群体而言,与传统动静脉(Cimino - Brescia)分流术相比,双腔带 cuff 中心静脉导管被证明是一种重要的替代性血管通路。通常,这些导管用作过渡通路,直至动静脉内瘘或移植物可供使用,或者在未计划建立动静脉内瘘或移植物时用作永久性通路(NKF - DOQI)。我们对颈内静脉永久性导管置入及其相关的早期和长期并发症进行了一项前瞻性研究。从1991年2月至2001年2月,我们为124例终末期肾病患者置入了135根带 cuff 导管(130根置于右侧颈内静脉,5根置于左侧颈内静脉),其中92根为 Permcath,27根为 Vascath,16根为 Ash - Split。我们在 Sedillot 三角下侧超声引导下穿刺颈内静脉置入导管,并通过腔内心电图(EC - ECG)检查导管尖端的准确位置。导管使用时间为60至1460天,平均345天。1年的精算生存率为82%,2年为56%,3年为42%,4年为20%。出口部位感染率和败血症发生率分别为每1000导管日5.2次和2.86次。导管败血症导致3例患者死亡,所有这些患者都有多种内科问题。发生了几次血栓形成事件(占透析次数的6%),需要用尿激酶治疗,12例患者(9.6%)需要更换导管。3例导管发生移位并进行了正确的重新定位。2根导管(Ash - Split)因导管外部意外损坏(酒精消毒剂)而被更换。在一次经导丝进行的选择性导管更换过程中发生了1次导管尖端栓塞。带 cuff 隧道式导管常见的问题之一是血流量不佳,最常见的原因是管腔内形成纤维蛋白鞘。即使我们进行的是一项非随机研究,但根据我们的经验,导管功能障碍发生率较高的是未进行抗凝治疗的组。因此,我们建议在所有没有禁忌证的佩戴中心血管导管的患者中进行抗凝治疗。就在一年前,我们遵循了NKF - DOQI血管通路临床实践指南,该指南指出,对于有原发性动静脉内瘘正在成熟但需要立即进行血液透析的患者,隧道式带 cuff 导管是首选通路,首选置入部位是右侧颈内静脉。考虑到最近关于颈内静脉插管后永久性中心静脉狭窄或闭塞的报道,目前,我们的首选是使用光滑硅胶导管进行股静脉插管,如果需要长期使用(超过3 - 4周)则进行隧道式置管。我们认为,应尽量避免右侧颈内静脉穿刺以及适合放置血管通路的手臂静脉穿刺,尤其是非优势手臂的头静脉。我们的数据证实,永久性静脉导管可能是慢性血液透析有效的长期血管通路,特别是对于患有心血管疾病的老年患者和癌症患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验