• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手辅助腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的长期疗效:与开放手术的比较。

Long-term outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma: comparison with open surgery.

作者信息

Chung Shiu-Dong, Chueh Shih-Chieh, Lai Ming-Kuen, Huang Chao-Yuan, Pu Yeong-Shiau, Yu Hong-Jeng, Huang Kuo-How

机构信息

Department of Urology, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, Ban-Ciao, Taipei County, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2007 Jun;21(6):595-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.9948.

DOI:10.1089/end.2006.9948
PMID:17638552
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and long-term outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (HALNU) in treating upper urinary-tract transitional-cell carcinoma (UT-TCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the data from 39 patients who underwent HALNU in our institution between January 1999 and December 2002 for urothelial carcinoma of the ureter or kidney. Preoperative and perioperative data were collected retrospectively by reviewing medical records. The oncologic outcomes, including bladder recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival, were compared with those of 36 contemporary patients undergoing conventional open radical nephroureterectomy (ONU). The median follow-up was 48 months (range 6 2 months) in the HALNU group and 59.5 months in the ONU group (range 8 8 months). Patients ages, sex, body mass index, pathologic parameters, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification showed no significant difference between the groups.

RESULTS

The HALNU group had statistically less blood loss (183 mL v 422 mL; P = 0.02). The average hospital stay and dose of narcotic analgesics were significantly less in the HALNU group. The complication rates were similar (12.8% for HALNU and 8.3% for ONU; P = 0.53). The 5-year bladder recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The HALNU is a less-invasive technique with 5-year bladder recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival rates similar to those of ONU for patients with UT-TCC.

摘要

目的

评估手辅助腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术(HALNU)治疗上尿路移行细胞癌(UT-TCC)的疗效和长期预后。

患者与方法

我们分析了1999年1月至2002年12月间在我院接受HALNU治疗输尿管或肾盂尿路上皮癌的39例患者的数据。通过查阅病历回顾性收集术前和围手术期数据。将包括无膀胱复发生存率、癌症特异性生存率和总生存率在内的肿瘤学预后与36例同期接受传统开放性根治性肾输尿管切除术(ONU)的患者进行比较。HALNU组的中位随访时间为48个月(范围6至2个月),ONU组为59.5个月(范围8至8个月)。两组患者的年龄、性别、体重指数、病理参数和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级无显著差异。

结果

HALNU组术中失血在统计学上更少(183 mL对422 mL;P = 0.02)。HALNU组的平均住院时间和麻醉性镇痛药用量显著更少。两组的并发症发生率相似(HALNU组为12.8%,ONU组为8.3%;P = 0.53)。两组的5年无膀胱复发生存率、癌症特异性生存率和总生存率相似。

结论

对于UT-TCC患者,HALNU是一种侵入性较小的技术,其5年无膀胱复发生存率、癌症特异性生存率和总生存率与ONU相似。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma: comparison with open surgery.手辅助腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的长期疗效:与开放手术的比较。
J Endourol. 2007 Jun;21(6):595-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.9948.
2
Long-term outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for pathologic T3 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗病理T3期上尿路尿路上皮癌的长期疗效
J Endourol. 2009 Jan;23(1):75-80. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0267.
3
Comparison between hand-assisted laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: analysis of an intermediate follow-up period.手辅助腹腔镜与后腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的比较:中期随访分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Feb;18(1):49-53. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318159e84b.
4
Intermediate follow-up of hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: comparison with open nephroureterectomy.手辅助后腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的中期随访:与开放性肾输尿管切除术的比较
Urology. 2007 Jun;69(6):1030-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.088.
5
Comparison of Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.开放性与腹腔镜及手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jun;28(6):656-681. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0662. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
6
Intermediate-term oncological outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open bilateral nephroureterectomy for dialysis and kidney transplant patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.手辅助腹腔镜与开放双侧肾输尿管切除术治疗透析及肾移植的上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的中期肿瘤学结局
J Endourol. 2009 Jul;23(7):1139-44. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0162.
7
Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of transitional-cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术与开放性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌的对比
J Endourol. 2001 May;15(4):391-5; discussion 397. doi: 10.1089/089277901300189402.
8
Outcomes of surgical treatment for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: comparison of retroperitoneoscopic and open nephroureterectomy.上尿路移行细胞癌的外科治疗结果:后腹腔镜与开放性肾输尿管切除术的比较
World J Surg Oncol. 2008 Jan 15;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-6-3.
9
Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.腹腔镜与开放性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的系统评价和累积分析比较研究。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jun;61(6):1142-53. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.019. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
10
Comparison of surgical outcome and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome score between retroperitoneoscopic hand-assisted nephroureterectomy and open nephroureterectomy.后腹腔镜手辅助肾输尿管切除术与开放性肾输尿管切除术的手术结果及全身炎症反应综合征评分比较。
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2006 Dec;52(12):903-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic effects of different nephroureterectomy techniques for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.不同肾输尿管切除术技术对上尿路尿路上皮癌的预后影响:一项网状Meta分析
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13773-1.
2
Efficacy and utility of robotic single-access bilateral nephrectomy (r-SABN) in end-stage renal disease patients.机器人单通道双侧肾切除术(r-SABN)在终末期肾病患者中的疗效和实用性。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Aug;15(4):511-518. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01137-9. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
3
Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: the Taiwan Robot Urological Surgery Team (TRUST) experience.
机器人辅助肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:台湾机器人泌尿外科手术团队(TRUST)的经验
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul 17;12:219. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-219.
4
Oncologic outcomes obtained after laparoscopic, robotic and/or single port nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract tumours.腹腔镜、机器人和/或单孔肾盂输尿管癌根治术治疗上尿路肿瘤的肿瘤学结果。
World J Urol. 2013 Feb;31(1):93-107. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0968-0. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
5
Ureteroscopic laser treatment of upper urinary tract neoplasms.经输尿管镜激光治疗上尿路肿瘤。
World J Urol. 2010 Apr;28(2):143-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-010-0525-7. Epub 2010 Mar 14.
6
Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and management of the distal ureter: a review of current techniques and outcomes.腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术及输尿管远端的处理:当前技术与结果综述
Adv Urol. 2009;2009:721371. doi: 10.1155/2009/721371. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
7
Oncological risk of laparoscopic surgery in urothelial carcinomas.尿路上皮癌腹腔镜手术的肿瘤学风险
World J Urol. 2009 Feb;27(1):81-8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-008-0349-x. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
8
Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: oncologic outcomes and management of distal ureter; review of the literature.腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术:肿瘤学结局及输尿管远端的处理;文献综述
Adv Urol. 2009;2009:826725. doi: 10.1155/2009/826725. Epub 2008 Nov 5.