Viprakasit Davis P, Macejko Amanda M, Nadler Robert B
Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60208, USA.
Adv Urol. 2009;2009:721371. doi: 10.1155/2009/721371. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) is becoming an increasingly common alternative treatment for transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the renal pelvis and ureter due to decreased perioperative morbidity, shorter hospitalization, and comparable oncologic control with open nephroureterectomy (ONU). Mobilization of the kidney and proximal ureter may be performed through a transperitoneal, retroperitoneal, or hand-assisted approach. Each technique is associated with its own benefits and limitations, and the optimal approach is often dictated by surgeon preference. Our analysis of the literature reflects equivalent cancer control between LPN and OPN at intermediate follow-up with significantly improved perioperative morbidity following LPN. Several methods for bladder cuff excision have been advocated, however, no individual technique for management of the distal ureter proved superior. Overall, complete en-bloc resection with minimal disruption of the urinary tract should be optimized to maintain oncologic outcomes. Longer follow-up and prospective studies are needed to fully evaluate these techniques.
由于围手术期发病率降低、住院时间缩短以及与开放性肾输尿管切除术(ONU)相当的肿瘤学控制效果,腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术(LNU)正日益成为肾盂和输尿管移行细胞癌(TCC)的一种常见替代治疗方法。肾脏和近端输尿管的游离可通过经腹腔、腹膜后或手辅助途径进行。每种技术都有其自身的优点和局限性,最佳方法通常由外科医生的偏好决定。我们对文献的分析表明,在中期随访中,腹腔镜肾部分切除术(LPN)和开放性肾部分切除术(OPN)在癌症控制方面相当,LPN术后围手术期发病率显著改善。已经提出了几种膀胱袖口切除术的方法,然而,没有一种单独的远端输尿管处理技术被证明更优越。总体而言,应优化完整整块切除并尽量减少对尿路的干扰,以维持肿瘤学结果。需要更长时间的随访和前瞻性研究来全面评估这些技术。