Murray Clinton K, Hoffmaster Roselle M, Schmit David R, Hospenthal Duane R, Ward John A, Cancio Leopoldo C, Wolf Steven E
Infectious Disease Service, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.
Arch Surg. 2007 Jul;142(7):639-42. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.7.639.
To investigate whether specific values of or changes in temperature, white blood cell count, or neutrophil percentage were predictive of bloodstream infection in burn patients.
Retrospective review of electronic records.
Intensive care center at the US Army Institute of Surgical Research Burn Center.
Burn patients with blood cultures obtained from 2001 to 2004.
Temperature recorded at the time blood cultures were obtained; highest temperature in each 6-hour interval during the 24 hours prior to this; white blood cell count and neutrophil percentage at the time of obtaining the blood culture and during the 24 hours preceding the blood culture; demographic data; and total body surface area burned.
A total of 1063 blood cultures were obtained from 223 patients. Seventy-three people had 140 blood cultures from which microorganisms were recovered. Organisms that were recovered from blood cultures included 80 that were gram negative, 54 that were gram positive, 3 that were mixed gram positive/gram negative, and 3 yeasts. Although white blood cell count and neutrophil percentage at the time of the culture were statistically different between patients with and patients without bloodstream infection, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed these values to be poor discriminators (receiver operating characteristic curve area = 0.624). Temperature or alterations in temperature in the preceding 24-hour period did not predict presence, absence, or type of bloodstream infection.
Temperature, white blood cell count, neutrophil percentage, or changes in these values were not clinically reliable in predicting bloodstream infection. Further work is needed to identify alternative clinical parameters, which should prompt blood culture evaluations in this population.
研究体温、白细胞计数或中性粒细胞百分比的特定值或变化是否可预测烧伤患者的血流感染。
对电子记录进行回顾性分析。
美国陆军外科研究所烧伤中心的重症监护中心。
2001年至2004年期间进行血培养的烧伤患者。
采集血培养时记录的体温;采集血培养前24小时内每6小时间隔的最高体温;采集血培养时及血培养前24小时内的白细胞计数和中性粒细胞百分比;人口统计学数据;以及烧伤总面积。
共从223例患者中采集了1063份血培养样本。73人有140份血培养样本培养出微生物。从血培养样本中分离出的微生物包括80株革兰阴性菌、54株革兰阳性菌、3株革兰阳性/革兰阴性混合菌和3株酵母菌。虽然有血流感染和无血流感染患者培养时的白细胞计数和中性粒细胞百分比在统计学上有差异,但受试者工作特征曲线分析显示这些值的鉴别能力较差(受试者工作特征曲线面积=0.624)。前24小时的体温或体温变化不能预测血流感染的存在、不存在或类型。
体温、白细胞计数、中性粒细胞百分比或这些值的变化在预测血流感染方面在临床上不可靠。需要进一步开展工作以确定其他临床参数,这些参数应促使对该人群进行血培养评估。