Mathews Vikram, George Biju, Deotare Uday, Lakshmi Kavitha M, Viswabandya Auro, Daniel Dolly, Chandy Mammen, Srivastava Alok
Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, India.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007 Aug;13(8):889-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
One hundred ninety patients underwent 197 HLA-matched related allogeneic stem cell transplantation for a diagnosis of beta thalassemia major at our center. The median age (+/-SD) was 7+/-4.1 years, and there were 129 (68%) males. Age and liver size as continuous variables were significantly associated with an adverse outcome. Using a receiver operator characteristics curve plot analysis, cutoff values of 7 years and 5 cm for age and liver size, respectively, were associated with the highest likelihood ratio of an adverse impact. On a multivariate analysis age>or=7 years and liver size>or=5 cm had a significant impact on event free survival (EFS) (relative risk 2.2 and 2.7, P values .014 and .000, respectively). Using these 2 variables, patients were categorized as high risk if they were >or=7 years and had a liver size>or=5 cm (n=41; all belonged to Class III). The 5-year EFS and overall survival (OS) in this high-risk group was 23.93+/-6.88 and 39.01+/-7.96, whereas in the remaining Class III patients (n=64) it was 70.3+/-6.06 and 78.3+/-5.5, respectively. This risk stratification identifies a significant subset (39%) of patients among those in Class III who have a poor outcome with a conventional myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Patients in this high-risk group would probably benefit from novel therapeutic approaches.
190例患者在我们中心接受了197次人类白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配的亲缘异体干细胞移植,诊断为重型β地中海贫血。年龄中位数(±标准差)为7±4.1岁,男性有129例(68%)。年龄和肝脏大小作为连续变量与不良预后显著相关。通过受试者工作特征曲线分析,年龄和肝脏大小的截断值分别为7岁和5cm时,与不良影响的最高似然比相关。多因素分析显示,年龄≥7岁和肝脏大小≥5cm对无事件生存期(EFS)有显著影响(相对风险分别为2.2和2.7,P值分别为0.014和0.000)。使用这两个变量,如果患者年龄≥7岁且肝脏大小≥5cm,则被归类为高危(n = 41;均属于Ⅲ类)。该高危组的5年EFS和总生存期(OS)分别为23.93±6.88和39.01±7.96,而其余Ⅲ类患者(n = 64)的5年EFS和总生存期分别为70.3±6.06和78.3±5.5。这种风险分层在Ⅲ类患者中识别出了一个显著的亚组(39%),这些患者采用传统的清髓性异体干细胞移植预后较差。该高危组患者可能会从新的治疗方法中获益。