Suppr超能文献

哪种剥夺?选定剥夺指数的比较。

Which deprivation? A comparison of selected deprivation indexes.

作者信息

Morris R, Carstairs V

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, Usher Institute, Medical School, Edinburgh.

出版信息

J Public Health Med. 1991 Nov;13(4):318-26.

PMID:1764290
Abstract

A number of indexes of deprivation which have been devised or adopted for use by the health services are examined in relation to their performance in explaining the variation observed in a range of health measures, using data for postcode sectors in Scotland. The Scottish deprivation score and the Townsend index are found to explain most variation, and to adhere most closely to the concept of material disadvantage. The Jarman score is less effective as a result of the inclusion of individual variables which are seen to correlate very weakly, even negatively, with the health indicators. The use of these measures in relation to resource allocation and the new GP contract is discussed.

摘要

针对卫生服务部门所设计或采用的一系列贫困指数,利用苏格兰邮政编码区域的数据,考察了它们在解释一系列卫生指标中所观察到的差异方面的表现。结果发现,苏格兰贫困得分和汤森指数能够解释大部分差异,并且与物质匮乏概念最为契合。由于纳入了一些与健康指标相关性非常弱甚至呈负相关的个体变量,贾曼得分的效果较差。讨论了这些指标在资源分配和新的全科医生合同方面的应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验