Shanks Alan L, Roegner G Curtis
University of Oregon, Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, P.O. Box 5389, Charleston, Oregon 97420, USA.
Ecology. 2007 Jul;88(7):1726-37. doi: 10.1890/06-1003.1.
Ecologists have long debated the relative importance of biotic interactions vs. abiotic forces on the population dynamics of both marine and terrestrial organisms. Investigation of stock size in Dungeness crab (Cancer magister) is a classic example of this debate. We first tested the hypothesis that adult population size was set by larval success. We found that during a five-year sampling period, adult crab population size from Oregon through central California, USA, as measured by the commercial catch, varied directly with the number of terminal-stage larvae (megalopae) returning to Coos Bay, Oregon, four years earlier; adult population size was largely determined (> 90% of the variation) by success during the larval stage. We then tested whether biotic interactions or abiotic forces caused the variation in larval success. Most of the variation (> 90%) in the number of returning megalopae is explained by the timing of the spring transition, a seasonal shift in atmospheric forcing that drives ocean currents along the west coast of the United States. Early spring transitions lead to larger numbers of returning Dungeness megalopae, while in four other crab taxa, species with very different life history characteristics, early-spring transitions lead to lower numbers of returning megalopae. During the past roughly 30 years, the size of the commercial catch of Dungeness crab is significantly and negatively correlated with the date of the spring transition throughout the California Current system. Long-term variation in the date of the spring transition may explain a major crash in the Dungeness crab fishery in central California, which began in the late 1950s. The data suggest that Dungeness crab population size is determined by variation in larval success and that a significant portion of this variation is due to the timing of the spring transition, a large-scale climatic forcer.
长期以来,生态学家一直在争论生物相互作用与非生物力量对海洋和陆地生物种群动态的相对重要性。对邓杰内斯蟹(Cancer magister)种群规模的调查就是这场争论的一个经典例子。我们首先检验了一个假设,即成年蟹的种群规模是由幼体成活率决定的。我们发现,在一个为期五年的采样期内,从美国俄勒冈州到加利福尼亚州中部的成年蟹种群规模,以商业捕捞量来衡量,与四年前返回俄勒冈州库斯湾的末龄幼体(大眼幼体)数量直接相关;成年蟹种群规模在很大程度上(超过90%的变化)由幼体阶段的成活率决定。然后我们检验了是生物相互作用还是非生物力量导致了幼体成活率的变化。返回的大眼幼体数量的大部分变化(超过90%)可以用春季转变的时间来解释,春季转变是一种大气强迫的季节性变化,它驱动着美国西海岸的洋流。早春转变会导致更多的邓杰内斯大眼幼体返回,而在其他四种蟹类中,具有非常不同生活史特征的物种,早春转变会导致返回的大眼幼体数量减少。在过去大约30年里,整个加利福尼亚洋流系统中,邓杰内斯蟹商业捕捞量的大小与春季转变的日期显著负相关。春季转变日期的长期变化可能解释了加利福尼亚中部始于20世纪50年代末的邓杰内斯蟹渔业的一次重大崩溃。数据表明,邓杰内斯蟹的种群规模是由幼体成活率的变化决定的,而且这种变化的很大一部分是由于春季转变的时间,这是一种大规模的气候驱动因素。