Rees J S, Jenkins S M, James T, Dummer P M H, Bryant S, Hayes S J, Oliver S, Stone D, Fenton C
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2007 Jun;15(2):89-92.
The use of virtual reality (VR) training in dentistry is a recent innovation and little research has been conducted to evaluate its use. For each preclinical exercise carried out the VR software currently records a final mark for the procedure, the time taken to complete the procedure and the number of 'internal' assessments carried out by the student. The aims of this study were two fold; a critical appraisal of the software by the students using a structured feedback together with an assessment of any link between the preparation time, final mark and number of evaluations. Sixteen 2nd year undergraduate dental students spent 6 hours cutting an unlimited number of Class I cavities and Class II cavities. The final mark awarded by the VR software together with the overall preparation time and number of evaluations for each cavity were recorded. For the Class I cavity the mean mark obtained was 66.8, the mean preparation time was 12.5 mins and the mean number of evaluations was 6.7. For the Class II cavity the mean mark was 26.5, the mean preparation time was 18 mins and the mean number of evaluations was 7.0. Final marks were also stratified into quartiles (0-24, 25-49, 50- 74, 75-100). For the Class II cavity the time taken to complete the cavity and the number of evaluations made were greater for those cavities that gained a mark of 50 or more. In conclusion, this initial evaluation of the DentSim VR package was a generally positive undergraduate educational experience. The class II cavity was more difficult to cut than the class I which was reflected in the mean scores. There was also a trend towards higher marks being associated with longer preparation times and more evaluations during the preparation.
在牙科领域使用虚拟现实(VR)培训是一项新近的创新举措,目前针对其应用开展的研究较少。对于每一项临床前练习,VR软件都会记录该操作的最终成绩、完成该操作所需的时间以及学生进行的“内部”评估次数。本研究的目的有两个;一是让学生使用结构化反馈对软件进行批判性评估,二是评估准备时间、最终成绩和评估次数之间的任何关联。16名牙科专业本科二年级学生花费6小时切割数量不限的I类洞和II类洞。记录VR软件给出的最终成绩以及每个洞的总体准备时间和评估次数。对于I类洞,获得的平均成绩为66.8分,平均准备时间为12.5分钟,平均评估次数为6.7次。对于II类洞,平均成绩为26.5分,平均准备时间为18分钟,平均评估次数为7.0次。最终成绩也被分为四分位数(0 - 24、25 - 49、50 - 74、75 - 100)。对于II类洞,获得50分及以上成绩的洞,完成该洞所需的时间和进行的评估次数更多。总之,对DentSim VR软件包的这一初步评估总体上是一次积极的本科教育体验。II类洞比I类洞更难切割,这在平均分中得到了体现。在准备过程中,也存在成绩越高与准备时间越长以及评估次数越多相关的趋势。