Suppr超能文献

所报告的产前筛查的提供与接受情况中的不平等现象。

Inequalities in the reported offer and uptake of antenatal screening.

作者信息

Alderdice Fiona, McNeill Jenny, Rowe Rachel, Martin Denis, Dornan Jim

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

Public Health. 2008 Jan;122(1):42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Jul 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify whether there is a different pattern of reported offer and uptake of antenatal screening tests across social groups.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two large maternity hospitals in Northern Ireland.

SAMPLE

Women booking for antenatal care were recruited consecutively over a 3-month period commencing 1 September 2003. In total, 711 women were recruited at booking: 359 at Hospital 1 and 352 at Hospital 2. Six hundred and sixty-six women completed both interviews.

METHODS

Two semi-structured interviews were arranged with consenting participants. The first interview was conducted at the booking appointment, and the second interview took place after 23 weeks of gestation after all screening, including anomaly ultrasound, would have been offered.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Reported offer and uptake of all screening tests were explored in relation to key sociodemographic indicators: level of education; mother's occupation; partner's occupation; single parent status; car ownership; religious denomination; and Townsend Deprivation Index.

RESULTS

With the exception of screening for Down's syndrome and neural tube defects, virtually all of the women were offered and underwent screening tests. Further analysis of data from Hospital 1 showed that, after controlling for other sociodemographic factors, women with a lower level of education had a lower odds of reporting Down's syndrome screening being offered Down's syndrome screening. Women having private antenatal care had a higher odds of accepting the offer of a test for Down's syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

While the majority of antenatal screening tests are offered to all pregnant women in Northern Ireland, screening for Down's syndrome and NTD reflects a different pattern of offer and uptake. This paper provides evidence of variations in offer and uptake that exist even when it is hospital policy to offer screening to all women.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定不同社会群体在产前筛查检测的告知及接受情况上是否存在差异模式。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

北爱尔兰的两家大型妇产医院。

样本

从2003年9月1日开始的3个月期间,连续招募预约产前护理的妇女。总共711名妇女在预约时被招募:医院1有359名,医院2有352名。666名妇女完成了两次访谈。

方法

与同意参与的参与者安排两次半结构化访谈。第一次访谈在预约就诊时进行,第二次访谈在妊娠23周后所有筛查(包括异常超声检查)均已提供之后进行。

主要观察指标

探讨所有筛查检测的告知及接受情况与关键社会人口学指标的关系:教育水平;母亲职业;伴侣职业;单亲状况;汽车拥有情况;宗教信仰;以及汤森德贫困指数。

结果

除了唐氏综合征和神经管缺陷筛查外,几乎所有妇女都接受了筛查检测。对医院1的数据进一步分析表明,在控制了其他社会人口学因素后,教育水平较低的妇女被告知进行唐氏综合征筛查的几率较低。接受私人产前护理的妇女接受唐氏综合征检测的几率较高。

结论

虽然北爱尔兰的大多数孕妇都接受了产前筛查检测,但唐氏综合征和神经管缺陷筛查的告知及接受情况呈现出不同的模式。本文提供了即使医院政策是对所有妇女进行筛查,在告知及接受情况上仍存在差异的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验