Papazoglou N, Tsarouchas P, Loussidis P, Giannoulopoulos A, Kioussis A, Karatzas N B
Department of Cardiology, 1st Hospital of Social Security, Athens, Greece.
Clin Cardiol. 1991 Nov;14(11):913-6. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960141111.
A comparison of the respiratory responses of jogging in place, an alternative exercise test we recently proposed, was made with those of the Bruce exercise test. We obtained on-line measurements of heart rate, ventilation, oxygen uptake, and carbon dioxide production from 9 healthy subjects of mean age 25 years. There was a higher heart rate and ventilatory response with jogging than with the Bruce test, but by 10 minutes the responses of the two tests were similar. Oxygen consumption, while higher with jogging, rose in parallel with that of the Bruce test from the second to the seventh min, and the change of the ratio of minute ventilation to oxygen consumption indicated that the anaerobic threshold occurred earlier during jogging. These results show that jogging in place is more vigorous than the graded exercise test and may produce ischemia earlier.
我们最近提出了一种替代性运动测试——原地慢跑,并将其呼吸反应与布鲁斯运动测试的呼吸反应进行了比较。我们对9名平均年龄25岁的健康受试者进行了心率、通气、摄氧量和二氧化碳产生量的在线测量。与布鲁斯测试相比,原地慢跑时的心率和通气反应更高,但到10分钟时,两种测试的反应相似。虽然原地慢跑时的耗氧量更高,但从第2分钟到第7分钟,其与布鲁斯测试的耗氧量平行上升,分钟通气量与耗氧量之比的变化表明,原地慢跑时无氧阈值出现得更早。这些结果表明,原地慢跑比分级运动测试更剧烈,可能更早产生局部缺血。