McCarthy Michael A, Possingham Hugh P
Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne c/- The School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3010, Australia.
Conserv Biol. 2007 Aug;21(4):956-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00677.x.
Active adaptive management balances the requirements of management with the need to learn about the system being managed, which leads to better decisions. It is difficult to judge the benefit of management actions that accelerate information gain, relative to the benefit of making the best management decision given what is known at the time. We present a first step in developing methods to optimize management decisions that incorporate both uncertainty and learning via adaptive management. We assumed a manager can allocate effort to discrete units (e.g., areas for revegetation or animals for reintroduction), the outcome can be measured as success or failure (e.g., the revegetation in an area is successful or the animal survives and breeds), and the manager has two possible management options from which to choose. We further assumed that there is an annual budget that may be allocated to one or both of the two options and that the manager must decide on the allocation. We used Bayesian updating of the probability of success of the two options and stochastic dynamic programming to determine the optimal strategy over a specified number of years. The costs, level of certainty about the success of the two options, and the timeframe of management all influenced the optimal allocation of the annual budget. In addition, the choice of management objective had a large influence on the optimal decision. In a case study of Merri Creek, Melbourne, Australia, we applied the approach to determining revegetation strategies. Our approach can be used to determine how best to manage ecological systems in the face of uncertainty.
主动适应性管理在管理需求与了解被管理系统的需求之间取得平衡,从而做出更好的决策。相对于根据当时已知情况做出最佳管理决策的益处而言,很难判断加速信息获取的管理行动的益处。我们迈出了第一步,即开发方法来优化管理决策,该决策通过适应性管理纳入不确定性和学习。我们假设管理者可以将精力分配到离散的单元(例如,用于植被恢复的区域或用于重新引入的动物),结果可以衡量为成功或失败(例如,一个区域的植被恢复成功或动物存活并繁殖),并且管理者有两种可能的管理选项可供选择。我们进一步假设存在一个年度预算,可以分配给这两个选项中的一个或两个,并且管理者必须决定分配方式。我们使用贝叶斯更新两个选项成功的概率以及随机动态规划来确定在指定年份内的最优策略。成本、两个选项成功的确定性水平以及管理的时间范围都影响年度预算的最优分配。此外,管理目标的选择对最优决策有很大影响。在澳大利亚墨尔本梅里溪的一个案例研究中,我们应用该方法来确定植被恢复策略。我们的方法可用于确定在面对不确定性时如何最好地管理生态系统。