Gerkens S, Nechelput M, Annemans L, Peraux B, Mouchart M, Beguin C, Horsmans Y
Université catholique de Louvain, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
J Viral Hepat. 2007 Aug;14(8):523-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2006.00831.x.
According to the current guidelines, it is advised not to treat patients with mild chronic hepatitis C. However, discussions as to giving immediately a treatment (direct treatment) to these patients have started and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of such strategy is still unknown. The aim of this study was to estimate, in the health care payer perspective, the ICER of a direct treatment of patients with mild chronic hepatitis C in comparison with the strategy of monitoring these patients and treat them when the disease will progress to the state of moderate chronic hepatitis. The treatment assessed was the current standard treatment composed of pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin. At the beginning of the study, patients were aged 45. Long-term economic and clinical outcomes over a 30-year period were predicted using a Markov simulation model. Data were obtained from published literature. Monte Carlo simulations were used to determine 95% confidence intervals of results. The ICER of a direct treatment with PEG IFN alpha-2a and ribavirin is 23,046 euro/QALY (CI 95% 3,882 euro-42,392 euro) for genotypes 1-4-5-6 and 4,631 euro/QALY (CI 95% 797 euro-7,881 euro) for genotypes 2-3. Sensitivity analysis shows that it is only in extreme circumstances related to the utilities that the ICER for genotypes 1-4-5-6 is unacceptably high for the society (>50,000 euro). Even though a direct treatment is more expensive, it gives the advantage of curing greater number of patients and of increasing quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), implying that such strategy is generally cost-effective at a threshold of 50,000 euro/QALY.
根据现行指南,建议不对轻度慢性丙型肝炎患者进行治疗。然而,关于立即对这些患者进行治疗(直接治疗)的讨论已经开始,而这种策略的增量成本效益比(ICER)仍然未知。本研究的目的是从医疗保健支付方的角度,估计对轻度慢性丙型肝炎患者进行直接治疗与监测这些患者并在疾病进展到中度慢性肝炎状态时进行治疗的策略相比的ICER。所评估的治疗方法是目前由聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a和利巴韦林组成的标准治疗。在研究开始时,患者年龄为45岁。使用马尔可夫模拟模型预测了30年期间的长期经济和临床结果。数据来自已发表的文献。采用蒙特卡洛模拟来确定结果的95%置信区间。对于基因1-4-5-6型,聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a和利巴韦林直接治疗的ICER为23,046欧元/质量调整生命年(95%置信区间3,882欧元-42,392欧元),对于基因2-3型为4,631欧元/质量调整生命年(95%置信区间797欧元-7,881欧元)。敏感性分析表明,只有在与效用相关的极端情况下,基因1-4-5-6型的ICER对社会来说才高得不可接受(>50,000欧元)。尽管直接治疗成本更高,但它具有治愈更多患者和增加质量调整生命年(QALY)的优势,这意味着在50,000欧元/质量调整生命年的阈值下,这种策略通常具有成本效益。