• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于消融扁桃体切除术与双极电凝止血剥离扁桃体切除术的前瞻性随机对照试验。

A pilot randomized controlled trial of coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy with bipolar diathermy haemostasis.

作者信息

Mitic S, Tvinnereim M, Lie E, Saltyte B J

机构信息

ENT Department, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol. 2007 Aug;32(4):261-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2007.01468.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2273.2007.01468.x
PMID:17651267
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare postoperative recovery in children between 4 and 12 years undergoing tonsillectomy, using either coblation tonsillectomy or dissection tonsillectomy with bipolar diathermy haemostasis.

DESIGN

A prospective, single blind, randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

ENT clinic, University Teaching Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty paediatric patients, aged between 4 and 12 years and between 16 and 60 kg in weight with standard indication for tonsillectomy.

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to either coblation tonsillectomy or dissection tonsillectomy groups. Patients, parents, and nurses were blinded for operation method. Parents were asked to fill out a postoperative diary from 1 to 10 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes were scored for postoperative pain, nutrition, activity, and use of analgetics for each of the 10 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes were estimated from the nurses' postoperative data and 10-day follow-up statistics regarding crossing of the two-score limit.

RESULTS

The groups were statistically comparable by age, weight and operation type. There was no significant difference in operation time in two groups. Intra-operative bleeding was significantly less in the coblation group. Statistically significant differences between dissection tonsillectomy and coblation tonsillectomy were found in the day when a score of two of five was passed in pain scores (9.6 versus 6.2), nutrition scores (8.9 versus 6.6), activity score (8.4 versus 6.6) and medicine intake (9.4 versus 6.4), We found parallelism, between regression lines, that indicates better postoperative life quality for the coblation tonsillectomy group and approximately 2 days' shorter recovery time.

CONCLUSION

In our pilot study, patients undergoing coblation tonsillectomy reported less pain, quicker return to normal diet, quicker return to normal activity, and less use of analgetics over a 10-day period than patients undergoing dissection tonsillectomy. Our results indicate that the recovery period for coblation tonsillectomy was approximately 2 days shorter and demonstrated less morbidity.

摘要

目的

比较4至12岁接受扁桃体切除术的儿童,采用低温等离子扁桃体切除术或双极电凝止血剥离扁桃体切除术的术后恢复情况。

设计

一项前瞻性、单盲、随机对照试验。

地点

大学教学医院耳鼻喉科门诊。

参与者

40名儿科患者,年龄在4至12岁之间,体重在16至60公斤之间,有扁桃体切除术的标准指征。

方法

患者被随机分配到低温等离子扁桃体切除术组或剥离扁桃体切除术组。患者、家长和护士对手术方法不知情。要求家长填写术后1至10天的日记。

主要观察指标

主要结局指标是对术后10天中每天的术后疼痛、营养、活动及镇痛药使用情况进行评分。次要结局是根据护士的术后数据及关于越过两分界限的10天随访统计数据进行评估。

结果

两组在年龄、体重和手术类型方面具有统计学可比性。两组手术时间无显著差异。低温等离子组术中出血明显更少。在疼痛评分(9.6对6.2)、营养评分(8.9对6.6)、活动评分(8.4对6.6)和药物摄入(9.4对6.4)达到五分制中的两分的天数方面,剥离扁桃体切除术和低温等离子扁桃体切除术之间存在统计学显著差异。我们发现回归线之间具有平行性,这表明低温等离子扁桃体切除术组术后生活质量更好,恢复时间缩短约2天。

结论

在我们的初步研究中,与接受剥离扁桃体切除术的患者相比,接受低温等离子扁桃体切除术的患者在10天内报告的疼痛更少、更快恢复正常饮食、更快恢复正常活动且镇痛药使用更少。我们的结果表明,低温等离子扁桃体切除术的恢复期缩短约2天,且发病率更低。

相似文献

1
A pilot randomized controlled trial of coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy with bipolar diathermy haemostasis.一项关于消融扁桃体切除术与双极电凝止血剥离扁桃体切除术的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2007 Aug;32(4):261-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2007.01468.x.
2
A pilot randomised controlled trial of coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy with bipolar diathermy.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2007 Dec;32(6):495-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2007.01576.x.
3
Randomized controlled trial of Coblation versus electrocautery tonsillectomy.等离子刀与电灼扁桃体切除术的随机对照试验
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Feb;132(2):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.11.002.
4
A prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing PlasmaKnife with bipolar dissection tonsillectomy: evaluating an emerging technology.一项比较等离子刀与双极电凝扁桃体切除术的前瞻性多中心随机对照试验:评估一项新兴技术。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Apr;73(4):597-601. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.12.008. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
5
Cold dissection versus coblation-assisted adenotonsillectomy in children.儿童冷刀扁桃体腺样体切除术与等离子辅助扁桃体腺样体切除术的比较
Laryngoscope. 2007 Mar;117(3):406-10. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31802ffe47.
6
A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of coblation versus conventional dissection tonsillectomy on post-operative symptoms.一项关于低温等离子消融术与传统剥离法扁桃体切除术术后症状的双盲随机对照试验。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2005 Apr;30(2):143-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00953.x.
7
Coblation vs electrocautery tonsillectomy: postoperative recovery in adults.低温等离子体消融术与电烙术扁桃体切除术:成人术后恢复情况
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Nov;135(5):699-703. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.03.008.
8
Post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of cold dissection versus bipolar diathermy dissection.扁桃体切除术后出血:冷剥离术与双极电凝剥离术的前瞻性、随机对照临床试验
J Laryngol Otol. 2006 Jun;120(6):450-4. doi: 10.1017/S0022215106000120. Epub 2006 Jan 27.
9
Comparison of three common tonsillectomy techniques: a prospective randomized, double-blinded clinical study.三种常见扁桃体切除术技术的比较:一项前瞻性随机双盲临床研究。
Laryngoscope. 2009 Jan;119(1):162-70. doi: 10.1002/lary.20024.
10
Intracapsular versus subcapsular coblation tonsillectomy.囊内与囊下等离子扁桃体切除术
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Feb;138(2):153-157. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.11.006.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Study Between Coblation-Assisted Tonsillectomy and Conventional Dissection and Snare Tonsillectomy.等离子辅助扁桃体切除术与传统剥离加圈套器扁桃体切除术的比较研究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):e68281. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68281. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Comparative Study of Complications Associated with Coblation Versus Conventional Tonsillectomy.低温等离子刀扁桃体切除术与传统扁桃体切除术并发症的对比研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Dec;75(4):2870-2877. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03872-5. Epub 2023 May 20.
3
Postoperative Outcomes Following KTP-532 LASER Versus Coblation Assisted Paediatric Tonsillectomy.
KTP-532激光与低温等离子体辅助小儿扁桃体切除术后的结果
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun;75(2):880-885. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03271-2. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
4
Traditional and Coblation Tonsillectomy in Pediatrics Population: A Comparative Study.儿科人群中传统扁桃体切除术与低温等离子扁桃体切除术的比较研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):6414-6421. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01874-1. Epub 2020 May 8.
5
Intrapatient Comparison of Coblation versus Electrocautery Tonsillectomy in Children: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.儿童低温等离子射频消融术与电灼扁桃体切除术的患者内比较:一项随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 4;11(15):4561. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154561.
6
Coblation Versus Bipolar Diathermy Hemostasis in Pediatric Tonsillectomy Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.小儿扁桃体切除术中低温等离子消融术与双极电凝止血的比较:系统评价与Meta分析
Cureus. 2022 Mar 11;14(3):e23066. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23066. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Effect of a low temperature plasma knife on the treatment of chronic tonsillitis and its effect on T lymphocyte subsets.低温等离子刀治疗慢性扁桃体炎的效果及其对T淋巴细胞亚群的影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):2447-2455. eCollection 2021.
8
Comparison of three tonsillectomy techniques in children.三种儿童扁桃体切除术技术的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jun;278(6):2011-2015. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06299-8. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
9
Postoperative Pain and Wound Healing After Coblation-Assisted Barbed Anterior Pharyngoplasty (CABAPh): An Observational Study.低温等离子体辅助带倒刺前咽成形术(CABAPh)后的术后疼痛与伤口愈合:一项观察性研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Nov;71(Suppl 2):1157-1162. doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-01577-8. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
Comparison of two modern and conventional tonsillectomy techniques in terms of postoperative pain and collateral tissue damage.两种现代与传统扁桃体切除术在术后疼痛及周围组织损伤方面的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jul;276(7):2061-2067. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05464-y. Epub 2019 May 13.