Kerr William C, Greenfield Thomas K
Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, Calilfornia 94608, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Oct;31(10):1714-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00467.x. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
To validate improved survey estimates of alcohol volume and new expenditures questions, these measures were aggregated and evaluated through comparison to sales data. Using the new measures, we examined their distributions by estimating the proportion of mean intake, heavy drinking days, and alcohol expenditures among drinkers grouped by volume.
The 2000 National Alcohol Survey is a random digit dialed telephone survey of the United States with 7,612 respondents including 323 who were recontacted for drink ethanol measurement. Among drinkers, we utilized improved drink ethanol content estimates and beverage-specific graduated frequency measures to assess alcohol consumption and past month beverage-specific spending reports to estimate expenditures.
Coverage of alcohol sales by the new measures was estimated to be 52.3% for consumption and 59.3% for expenditures. Coverage was best for wine at 92.1% of sales, but improved most for spirits from 37.2% to 55.2%, when empirical drink ethanol content was applied. Distribution estimates showed that the top 10% of drinkers drank 55.3% of the total alcohol consumed, accounted for 61.6% of all 5+ and nearly 80% of all 12+ drinking days. Spirits consumption was the most concentrated with the top decile consuming 62.9% of the total for this beverage. This decile accounted for 33% of total expenditures, even though its mean expenditure per drink was considerably lower ($0.79) than the bottom 50% of drinkers ($4.75).
The distributions of mean alcohol intake and heavy drinking days are highly concentrated in the U.S. population. Lower expenditures per drink by the heaviest drinkers suggest substantial downward quality substitution, drinking in cheaper contexts or other bargain pricing strategies. Empirical drink ethanol estimates improved survey coverage of sales particularly for spirits, but significant under-coverage remains, highlighting need for further self-report measurement improvement.
为验证酒精摄入量和新支出问题的调查估计值的改进情况,通过与销售数据进行比较,对这些指标进行汇总和评估。使用新指标,我们通过估计按饮酒量分组的饮酒者中平均摄入量、重度饮酒天数和酒精支出的比例来研究其分布情况。
2000年全国酒精调查是一项对美国进行的随机数字拨号电话调查,有7612名受访者,其中323人被再次联系以测量饮用乙醇量。在饮酒者中,我们利用改进后的饮用乙醇含量估计值和特定饮料的分级频率指标来评估酒精消费情况,并使用过去一个月特定饮料的支出报告来估计支出。
新指标对酒精销售的覆盖率估计为:消费量为52.3%,支出为59.3%。葡萄酒的覆盖率最高,为销售额的92.1%,但烈酒的覆盖率改善最大,从37.2%提高到55.2%(应用实际饮用乙醇含量时)。分布估计表明,前10%的饮酒者饮用了总酒精消费量的55.3%,占所有5天及以上饮酒天数的61.6%,几乎占所有12天及以上饮酒天数的80%。烈酒消费最为集中,前十分位人群消费了该饮料总量的62.9%。这一十分位人群占总支出的33%,尽管其每杯饮料的平均支出(0.79美元)远低于后50%的饮酒者(4.75美元)。
在美国人群中,平均酒精摄入量和重度饮酒天数的分布高度集中。饮酒量最大的人群每杯饮料的支出较低,这表明存在大量向下的质量替代、在更便宜的环境中饮酒或其他讨价还价的定价策略。实际饮用乙醇估计值提高了调查对销售的覆盖率,尤其是对烈酒的覆盖率,但仍存在显著的覆盖率不足问题,这突出表明需要进一步改进自我报告测量方法。