• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酗酒者购买酒精饮料;廉价酒精并非单一商品。

Alcohol purchasing by ill heavy drinkers; cheap alcohol is no single commodity.

作者信息

Gill J, Chick J, Black H, Rees C, O'May F, Rush R, McPake B A

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Napier University, Edinburgh, EH11 4BN, UK.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Napier University, Edinburgh, EH11 4BN, UK.

出版信息

Public Health. 2015 Dec;129(12):1571-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2015.08.013
PMID:26411488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4684143/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Potential strategies to address alcohol misuse remain contentious. We aim to characterise the drink purchases of one population group: heavy drinkers in contact with Scottish health services. We contrast our findings with national sales data and explore the impact of socio-economic status on purchasing behaviour.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study comparing alcohol purchasing and consumption by heavy drinkers in Edinburgh and Glasgow during 2012.

METHODS

639 patients with serious health problems linked to alcohol (recruited within NHS hospital clinics (in- and out-patient settings) 345 in Glasgow, 294 in Edinburgh) responded to a questionnaire documenting demographic data and last week's or a 'typical' weekly consumption (type, brand, volume, price, place of purchase). Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile was derived as proxy of sociodemographic status.

RESULTS

Median consumption was 184.8 (IQR = 162.2) UK units/week paying a mean of 39.7 pence per alcohol unit (£0.397). Off-sales accounted for 95% of purchases with 85% of those <50 pence (£0.5 UK) per alcohol unit. Corresponding figures for the Scottish population are 69% and 60%. The most popular low-priced drinks were white cider, beer and vodka with the most common off-sales outlet being the corner shop, despite supermarkets offering cheaper options. Consumption levels of the cheapest drink (white cider) were similar across all quintiles apart from the least deprived.

CONCLUSIONS

Heavy drinkers from all quintiles purchase the majority of their drinks from off-sale settings seeking the cheapest drinks, often favouring local suppliers. While beer was popular, recent legislation impacting on the sale of multibuys may prevent the heaviest drinkers benefiting from the lower beer prices available in supermarkets. Non-etheless, drinkers were able to offset higher unit prices with cheaper drink types and maintain high levels of consumption. Whilst price is key, heavy drinkers are influenced by other factors and adapt their purchasing as necessary.

摘要

目的

应对酒精滥用的潜在策略仍存在争议。我们旨在描述一类人群的饮酒购买情况:与苏格兰医疗服务机构有接触的重度饮酒者。我们将研究结果与全国销售数据进行对比,并探讨社会经济地位对购买行为的影响。

研究设计

2012年在爱丁堡和格拉斯哥对重度饮酒者的酒精购买与消费情况进行比较的横断面研究。

方法

639名与酒精相关的严重健康问题患者(在NHS医院诊所(门诊和住院部)招募,格拉斯哥345名,爱丁堡294名)回答了一份记录人口统计学数据以及上周或“典型”每周饮酒量(类型、品牌、数量、价格、购买地点)的问卷。采用苏格兰多重剥夺指数五分位数作为社会人口学地位的代理指标。

结果

每周饮酒量中位数为184.8(四分位间距 = 162.2)英国单位,每酒精单位平均花费39.7便士(0.397英镑)。非售酒渠道购买占总购买量的95%,其中85%的购买单价低于50便士(0.5英镑)每酒精单位。苏格兰人口的相应数字分别为69%和60%。最受欢迎的低价饮品是白苹果酒、啤酒和伏特加,最常见的非售酒购买场所是街角商店,尽管超市提供更便宜的选择。除了最不贫困的五分位数人群外,所有五分位数人群中最便宜饮品(白苹果酒)的消费水平相似。

结论

所有五分位数人群中的重度饮酒者大多从非售酒渠道购买饮品,寻求最便宜的酒,且通常青睐当地供应商。虽然啤酒很受欢迎,但近期影响多瓶购买销售的立法可能使饮酒量最大的人无法从超市较低的啤酒价格中受益。尽管如此,饮酒者能够通过选择更便宜的饮品类型来抵消较高的单价,并维持较高的饮酒量。虽然价格是关键,但重度饮酒者还受其他因素影响,并会根据需要调整购买行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448f/4684143/3217c9b76dc8/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448f/4684143/f0587fb90234/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448f/4684143/04b5e3b6958a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448f/4684143/7c4fda465823/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448f/4684143/6c6c7a624865/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448f/4684143/3217c9b76dc8/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448f/4684143/f0587fb90234/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448f/4684143/04b5e3b6958a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448f/4684143/7c4fda465823/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448f/4684143/6c6c7a624865/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448f/4684143/3217c9b76dc8/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Alcohol purchasing by ill heavy drinkers; cheap alcohol is no single commodity.酗酒者购买酒精饮料;廉价酒精并非单一商品。
Public Health. 2015 Dec;129(12):1571-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
2
The price of a drink: levels of consumption and price paid per unit of alcohol by Edinburgh's ill drinkers with a comparison to wider alcohol sales in Scotland.一种饮料的价格:与苏格兰更广泛的酒类销售相比,爱丁堡酗酒者的消费水平和每单位酒精支付的价格。
Addiction. 2011 Apr;106(4):729-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03225.x. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
3
White cider consumption and heavy drinkers: a low-cost option but an unknown price.饮用白苹果酒与酗酒者:一种低成本选择但代价未知。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2014 Nov;49(6):675-80. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agu068. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
4
Heavy Drinkers and the Potential Impact of Minimum Unit Pricing-No Single or Simple Effect?酗酒者与最低单位定价的潜在影响——并非单一或简单的效应?
Alcohol Alcohol. 2017 Nov 1;52(6):722-729. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agx060.
5
The enigma of 'harmful' alcohol consumption: evidence from a mixed methods study involving female drinkers in Scotland.“有害”饮酒之谜:来自一项涉及苏格兰女性饮酒者的混合方法研究的证据。
Perspect Public Health. 2016 Jan;136(1):34-42. doi: 10.1177/1757913915603039. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
6
Potential Impact of Minimum Unit Pricing for Alcohol in Ireland: Evidence from the National Alcohol Diary Survey.爱尔兰酒精饮料最低单位定价的潜在影响:来自全国酒精日记调查的证据。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2016 Nov;51(6):734-740. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agw051. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
7
Price elasticity of on- and off-premises demand for alcoholic drinks: A Tobit analysis.酒精饮料店内和店外需求的价格弹性:一项托比特分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jun 1;163:222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
8
Effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on different income and socioeconomic groups: a modelling study.酒精最低单位定价对不同收入和社会经济群体的影响:建模研究。
Lancet. 2014 May 10;383(9929):1655-1664. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62417-4. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
9
Estimated Effects of Different Alcohol Taxation and Price Policies on Health Inequalities: A Mathematical Modelling Study.不同酒精税和价格政策对健康不平等的估计影响:一项数学建模研究
PLoS Med. 2016 Feb 23;13(2):e1001963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001963. eCollection 2016 Feb.
10
The effect of alcohol price on dependent drinkers' alcohol consumption.酒精价格对酗酒者酒精消费的影响。
N Z Med J. 2015 Dec 18;128(1427):9-17.

引用本文的文献

1
A measure of alcohol affordability for Sweden: Capturing trends among different demographic groups.瑞典酒精可负担性的一项衡量指标:把握不同人口群体中的趋势。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2023 Jun;40(3):250-269. doi: 10.1177/14550725221143171. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
2
Changes in spirits purchasing behaviours after privatisation of government-controlled sales in Washington, USA.美国华盛顿政府控制销售私有化后精神类药物购买行为的变化。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019 Mar;38(3):294-301. doi: 10.1111/dar.12915.
3
Spirits purchasing and marijuana use behaviors of risky drinkers in the state of Washington from 2014 to 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of minimum price per unit of alcohol on patients with liver disease in the UK.英国每单位酒精最低价格对肝病患者的影响。
Clin Med (Lond). 2014 Aug;14(4):396-403. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-4-396.
2
The price of a drink: levels of consumption and price paid per unit of alcohol by Edinburgh's ill drinkers with a comparison to wider alcohol sales in Scotland.一种饮料的价格:与苏格兰更广泛的酒类销售相比,爱丁堡酗酒者的消费水平和每单位酒精支付的价格。
Addiction. 2011 Apr;106(4):729-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03225.x. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
2014 年至 2016 年华盛顿州有风险饮酒行为者的购酒和大麻使用情况。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 May 1;198:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.12.033. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
4
Consequences of removing cheap, super-strength beer and cider: a qualitative study of a UK local alcohol availability intervention.移除廉价高浓度啤酒和苹果酒的后果:一项关于英国当地酒精饮料供应干预措施的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 29;6(9):e010759. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010759.