Saarinen J P, Heikkinen M A, Rasku K, Salenius J P
Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, 33521 Tampere, Finland.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2007 Aug;48(4):485-9.
To assess the role of small saphenous vein (SSV) reflux in patients with a long history of varicose disease and previous stripping of the great saphenous vein (GSV).
Consecutive patients with a history of GSV stripping 5-19 years earlier were enrolled in this prospective clinical study. A total of 101 legs of 75 consecutive patients fulfilled the study criteria: previous stripping of GSV from ankle to groin at least 5 years earlier, no history of thromboembolism and no previous surgery of deep veins or SSV. All patients were studied clinically using standardized classifications: clinical class, clinical disability score (CDS) and venous clinical scoring system (VCSS). Colour flow duplex imaging (CFDI) was used to assess reflux in deep and superficial veins. Details of prior surgery were evaluated.
Overall, SSV reflux was noted in 28 (28%) of the legs, recurrent GSV (rGSV) in the thigh in 41 (41%), reflux in tributaries alone in 28 (28%) and a combination of SSV and rGSV reflux in 4 (3%). Segmental deep reflux was measured in 23 (23%) of the legs; the prevalence of deep reflux was significantly higher in complicated than in uncomplicated legs (12% versus 47%; P<0.05). Deep reflux was more frequently associated with SSV reflux than with rGSV reflux (50% versus 22%; P<0.05). The prevalence of SSV with or without deep reflux increased from 17% to 50% (P<0.05) when uncomplicated (C2-3) and complicated (C4-6) legs were compared. A similar increase was not seen in the legs with rGSV (39% versus 44%; P>0.05). SSV reflux without deep reflux was observed in 25% of the legs with complicated (C4-6) disease, whereas the prevalence of SSV reflux was low (9%) in uncomplicated (C2-3) legs. VCSS was higher in the legs with SSV reflux than in those with rGSV reflux. CDS scores tended to be higher in the SSV reflux group than in the legs with rGSV reflux or tributary reflux alone. After exclusion of deep reflux, the results remained at the same level.
Small saphenous vein (SSV) reflux is common in legs with recurrent varicose veins and previous stripping of the GSV. SSV reflux alone is frequent in complicated legs, and SSV reflux is typically associated with segmental deep reflux. Clinical and hemodynamical findings stress the role of SSV reflux in this selected venous population.
评估小隐静脉(SSV)反流在患有静脉曲张病史较长且之前已行大隐静脉(GSV)剥脱术患者中的作用。
选取5 - 19年前曾行GSV剥脱术的连续患者纳入这项前瞻性临床研究。连续75例患者的101条腿符合研究标准:至少在5年前从踝部至腹股沟行GSV剥脱术,无血栓栓塞病史,且之前未行深静脉或SSV手术。所有患者均采用标准化分类进行临床研究:临床分级、临床残疾评分(CDS)和静脉临床评分系统(VCSS)。彩色多普勒血流成像(CFDI)用于评估深静脉和浅静脉的反流情况。评估既往手术的详细情况。
总体而言,28条腿(28%)存在SSV反流,41条腿(41%)大腿部有复发性大隐静脉(rGSV)反流,28条腿(28%)仅属支有反流,4条腿(3%)同时存在SSV和rGSV反流。23条腿(23%)测量到节段性深静脉反流;复杂腿的深静脉反流患病率显著高于非复杂腿(12%对47%;P<0.05)。与rGSV反流相比,深静脉反流更常与SSV反流相关(50%对22%;P<0.05)。当比较非复杂(C2 - 3)腿和复杂(C4 - 6)腿时,伴有或不伴有深静脉反流的SSV反流患病率从17%增至50%(P<0.05)。rGSV腿中未观察到类似的增加(39%对44%;P>0.05)。在患有复杂(C4 - 6)疾病的腿中,25%观察到无深静脉反流的SSV反流,而在非复杂(C2 - 3)腿中SSV反流患病率较低(9%)。有SSV反流的腿的VCSS高于有rGSV反流的腿。SSV反流组的CDS评分往往高于有rGSV反流或仅属支反流的腿。排除深静脉反流后,结果仍保持在同一水平。
在有复发性静脉曲张且之前已行GSV剥脱术的腿中,小隐静脉(SSV)反流常见。在复杂腿中单纯SSV反流常见,且SSV反流通常与节段性深静脉反流相关。临床和血流动力学结果强调了SSV反流在这一特定静脉人群中的作用。