Khankari Kishore, Eder Mickey, Osborn Chandra Y, Makoul Gregory, Clayman Marla, Skripkauskas Silvia, Diamond-Shapiro Linda, Makundan Dan, Wolf Michael S
Access Community Health Network, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Oct;22(10):1410-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0295-0. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
Colorectal cancer screening rates remain low, especially among low-income and racial/ethnic minority groups.
We pilot-tested a physician-directed strategy aimed at improving rates of recommendation and patient colorectal cancer screening completion at 1 federally qualified health center serving low-income, African-American and Hispanic patients. Colonoscopy was specifically targeted.
Single arm, pretest-posttest design.
Urban.
154 screening-eligible, yet nonadherent primary care patients receiving care at an urban, federally qualified health center.
Chart review of whether patients received a physician recommendation for screening, and completion of any colorectal cancer screening test 12 months after intervention. Physicians recorded patients' qualitative reasons for noncompliance, and a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis for screening promotion was also conducted.
The baseline screening rate was 11.5%, with 31.6% of patients having received a recommendation from their physician. At 1-year follow-up, rates of screening completion had increased to 27.9 percent (p < .001), and physician recommendation had increased to 92.9% (p < .001). Common reasons for nonadherence included patient readiness (60.7%), competing health problems (11.9%), and fear or anxiety concerning the procedure (8.3%). The total cost for implementing the intervention was $4,676 and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the intervention was $106 per additional patient screened by colonoscopy.
The intervention appears to be a feasible means to improve colorectal cancer screening rates among patients served by community health centers. However, more attention to patient decision making and education may be needed to further increase screening rates.
结直肠癌筛查率仍然很低,尤其是在低收入群体以及少数种族/族裔群体中。
我们在一家为低收入非裔美国人和西班牙裔患者服务的联邦合格健康中心,对一项由医生主导的策略进行了试点测试,该策略旨在提高推荐率以及患者完成结直肠癌筛查的比例。结肠镜检查是特别针对的目标。
单组前后测试设计。
城市。
154名符合筛查条件但未坚持接受筛查的初级保健患者,他们在一家城市联邦合格健康中心接受治疗。
1)人工跟踪符合筛查条件的患者;2)在就诊前给患者邮寄医生信件和宣传册;3)开展健康素养培训,以帮助医生改善与患者的沟通,直至问题解决;4)建立一个“反馈回路”,定期监测患者的依从性。
通过病历审查来确定患者是否收到医生的筛查建议,以及干预后12个月内是否完成任何结直肠癌筛查测试。医生记录患者不依从的定性原因,并对筛查推广进行初步成本效益分析。
基线筛查率为11.5%,31.6%的患者收到了医生的建议。在1年的随访中,筛查完成率提高到了27.9%(p < 0.001),医生建议率提高到了92.9%(p < 0.001)。不依从的常见原因包括患者意愿(60.7%)、其他健康问题(11.9%)以及对检查的恐惧或焦虑(8.3%)。实施干预的总成本为4676美元,干预的增量成本效益比为每增加一名接受结肠镜检查的患者106美元。
该干预措施似乎是提高社区健康中心服务患者结直肠癌筛查率的一种可行方法。然而,可能需要更多关注患者的决策制定和教育,以进一步提高筛查率。