Denberg Thomas D, Melhado Trisha V, Coombes John M, Beaty Brenda L, Berman Kenneth, Byers Tim E, Marcus Alfred C, Steiner John F, Ahnen Dennis J
Department of Medicine, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences, Denver, Colo 80262, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Nov;20(11):989-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00164.x.
Colonoscopy has become a preferred colorectal cancer (CRC) screening modality. Little is known about why patients who are referred for colonoscopy do not complete the recommended procedures. Prior adherence studies have evaluated colonoscopy only in combination with flexible sigmoidoscopy, failed to differentiate between screening and diagnostic procedures, and have examined cancellations/no-shows, but not nonscheduling, as mechanisms of nonadherence.
Sociodemographic predictors of screening completion were assessed in a retrospective cohort of 647 patients referred for colonoscopy at a major university hospital. Then, using a qualitative study design, a convenience sample of patients who never completed screening after referral (n=52) was interviewed by telephone, and comparisons in reported reasons for nonadherence were made by gender.
Half of all patients referred for colonoscopy failed to complete the procedure, overwhelmingly because of nonscheduling. In multivariable analysis, female sex, younger age, and insurance type predicted poorer adherence. Patient-reported barriers to screening completion included cognitive-emotional factors (e.g., lack of perceived risk for CRC, fear of pain, and concerns about modesty and the bowel preparation), logistic obstacles (e.g., cost, other health problems, and competing demands), and health system barriers (e.g., scheduling challenges, long waiting times). Women reported more concerns about modesty and other aspects of the procedure than men. Only 40% of patients were aware of alternative screening options.
Adherence to screening colonoscopy referrals is sub-optimal and may be improved by better communication with patients, counseling to help resolve logistic barriers, and improvements in colonoscopy referral and scheduling mechanisms.
结肠镜检查已成为首选的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查方式。对于为何被转诊进行结肠镜检查的患者未完成推荐程序,人们知之甚少。先前的依从性研究仅将结肠镜检查与乙状结肠镜检查结合进行评估,未能区分筛查和诊断程序,并且研究了取消预约/未就诊情况,但未将未安排检查作为不依从的机制进行研究。
在一所大型大学医院对647名被转诊进行结肠镜检查的患者的回顾性队列中评估了筛查完成情况的社会人口统计学预测因素。然后,采用定性研究设计,通过电话采访了52名转诊后从未完成筛查的患者的便利样本,并按性别对报告的不依从原因进行了比较。
所有被转诊进行结肠镜检查的患者中有一半未能完成该程序,绝大多数原因是未安排检查。在多变量分析中,女性、年轻和保险类型预示着依从性较差。患者报告的筛查完成障碍包括认知情感因素(例如,对结直肠癌的感知风险不足、对疼痛的恐惧以及对隐私和肠道准备的担忧)、后勤障碍(例如,费用、其他健康问题和相互冲突的需求)以及卫生系统障碍(例如,安排检查的挑战、等待时间长)。女性比男性报告了更多对隐私和检查其他方面的担忧。只有40%的患者知道其他筛查选择。
对结肠镜检查转诊的依从性不理想,通过与患者更好地沟通、提供咨询以帮助解决后勤障碍以及改善结肠镜检查转诊和安排机制,可能会提高依从性。