Holm Søren, Bortolotti Lisa
Cardiff Law School, Cardiff University, Museum Avenue, Cardiff, UK.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2007;28(3):205-20. doi: 10.1007/s11017-007-9033-1.
In this paper we analyse the degree to which a distinction between social science and public health research and other non-research activities can account for differences between a number of large scale social surveys performed at the national and European level. The differences we will focus on are differences in how participation is elicited and how data are used for government, research and other purposes. We will argue that the research / non-research distinction does not account for the identified differences in recruitment or use and that there are no other convincing justifications. We argue that this entails that eliciting participation by coercion or manipulation becomes very difficult to justify.
在本文中，我们分析了社会科学与公共卫生研究及其他非研究活动之间的区分，在多大程度上能够解释在国家和欧洲层面开展的一些大规模社会调查之间的差异。我们将关注的差异在于参与是如何被激发的，以及数据是如何被用于政府、研究及其他目的的。我们将论证，研究/非研究的区分并不能解释在招募或使用方面所发现的差异，而且也不存在其他令人信服的理由。我们认为，这意味着通过强制或操纵来激发参与变得很难自圆其说。
