• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[吸入装置使用情况评估:一项针对基层医疗中儿童的观察性研究]

[Assessment of the handling of inhaler devices: an observational study of children in primary care].

作者信息

Malot L, Molimard M, Abouelfatah A, Lignot S, Depont F, Moore N, Fayon M

机构信息

Département de pédiatrie, centre de recherche (CEDRE), hôpital Pellegrin - Enfants, CHU de Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr. 2007 Oct;14(10):1190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2007.06.017. Epub 2007 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.arcped.2007.06.017
PMID:17658246
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The correct use of inhaler devices is important for the efficacy of the treatment of childhood asthma. Few studies have compared the use of inhaler devices in real life, in particular in children.

AIM

To determine whether such devices were correctly used in asthmatic children within a primary care setting.

POPULATION AND METHODS

Three hundred and sixty-four children aged 5 to 18 years (mean+/-SD: 14.1+/-3.3) treated for at least 1 month by an inhaler device were included. During a routine visit to the doctor, the primary care physician assessed the childrens' handling of their current device, using a checklist established for each device from the package leaflet.

RESULTS

At least half of the patients made at least 1 error, regardless of the inhaler used. The best result was obtained with the Diskus (46% error-rate) and the worst with the pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) (78% error-rate). The rank order of increasing critical-error rate (at least 1 error) was as follows: Diskus (6%)<Autohaler (8%)<Aerolizer (9%)<pMDI (24%)<Turbuhaler (26%).

CONCLUSION

Irrespective of the type of device used, many errors are committed in real-life use. Overall, the Diskus, the Autohaler and the Aerolizer devices are more correctly used than the Turbuhaler or the pMDIs. However, it would be relatively easy to rectify all the errors identified by this study by simple educative measures.

摘要

未标注

正确使用吸入装置对于儿童哮喘治疗的疗效很重要。很少有研究在现实生活中比较吸入装置的使用情况,尤其是在儿童中。

目的

确定在基层医疗环境中哮喘儿童是否正确使用了此类装置。

研究对象与方法

纳入364名年龄在5至18岁(平均±标准差:14.1±3.3)、使用吸入装置治疗至少1个月的儿童。在患儿常规就诊时,基层医疗医生使用根据每种装置的药品说明书制定的清单评估患儿对其当前使用装置的操作情况。

结果

无论使用哪种吸入器,至少一半的患者至少出现1次错误。使用都保装置(Diskus)的错误率最低(46%),而使用压力定量吸入器(pMDI)的错误率最高(78%)。严重错误率(至少出现1次错误)由低到高的排序如下:都保装置(6%)<自动吸入器(Autohaler)(8%)<雾化吸入器(Aerolizer)(9%)<压力定量吸入器(24%)<准纳器(Turbuhaler)(26%)。

结论

无论使用何种装置,在实际使用中都会出现许多错误。总体而言,都保装置、自动吸入器和雾化吸入器的使用比准纳器或压力定量吸入器更正确。然而,通过简单的教育措施相对容易纠正本研究中发现的所有错误。

相似文献

1
[Assessment of the handling of inhaler devices: an observational study of children in primary care].[吸入装置使用情况评估:一项针对基层医疗中儿童的观察性研究]
Arch Pediatr. 2007 Oct;14(10):1190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2007.06.017. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
2
How to achieve good compliance and adherence with inhalation therapy.如何实现良好的吸入治疗依从性和持续性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21 Suppl 4:S33-7. doi: 10.1185/030079905X61776.
3
Assessment of handling of inhaler devices in real life: an observational study in 3811 patients in primary care.现实生活中吸入装置使用情况的评估:一项针对3811名初级保健患者的观察性研究。
J Aerosol Med. 2003 Fall;16(3):249-54. doi: 10.1089/089426803769017613.
4
Handling of inhaler devices in actual pulmonary practice: metered-dose inhaler versus dry powder inhalers.实际肺部疾病诊疗中吸入装置的使用:定量吸入器与干粉吸入器的比较
Respir Care. 2008 Mar;53(3):324-8.
5
Patient perception of the diskus inhaler: a comparison with the turbuhaler inhaler.患者对都保吸入器的认知:与准纳器吸入器的比较。
Br J Clin Pract. 1996 Jan-Feb;50(1):14-9.
6
Assessment of inhalation technique in children in general practice: increased risk of incorrect performance with new device.全科医疗中儿童吸入技术的评估:新装置使用不当风险增加。
J Asthma. 2008 Jan-Feb;45(1):67-71. doi: 10.1080/02770900701815834.
7
Key issues in inhalation therapy in children.儿童吸入疗法中的关键问题。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21 Suppl 4:S27-32. doi: 10.1185/030079905X61767.
8
[Real-life use of inhaler devices for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care].[吸入装置在基层医疗中用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的实际应用]
Therapie. 2003 Nov-Dec;58(6):499-504. doi: 10.2515/therapie:2003081.
9
Correct use of three powder inhalers: comparison between Diskus, Turbuhaler, and Easyhaler.三种干粉吸入器的正确使用方法:都保、准纳器和易纳器的比较
J Asthma. 2005 Apr;42(3):173-8.
10
Handling of and preferences for available dry powder inhaler systems by patients with asthma and COPD.哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对现有干粉吸入器系统的使用及偏好
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2008 Dec;21(4):321-8. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2007.0634.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Novel Bronchodilator Vaping Drug Delivery System Based on Thermal Degradation Properties.基于热降解特性的新型支气管扩张剂雾化药物递送系统的研发
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Dec 15;16(12):1730. doi: 10.3390/ph16121730.
2
Comparison of inhalation technique with the Diskus and Autohaler in asthmatic children at home.在家中对哮喘儿童使用都保和自动吸入器的吸入技术进行比较。
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Apr 19;7(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00215-2019. eCollection 2021 Apr.
3
A systematic review of instruments aimed at evaluating metered-dose inhaler administration technique in children.
一项针对旨在评估儿童定量吸入器给药技术的工具的系统评价。
J Asthma. 2017 Mar;54(2):173-185. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2016.1198373. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
4
Switching patients from other inhaled corticosteroid devices to the Easyhaler(®): historical, matched-cohort study of real-life asthma patients.将患者从其他吸入性皮质类固醇装置切换到 Easyhaler(®):现实生活中哮喘患者的历史性、匹配队列研究。
J Asthma Allergy. 2014 Apr 10;7:31-51. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S59386. eCollection 2014.