• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对都保吸入器的认知:与准纳器吸入器的比较。

Patient perception of the diskus inhaler: a comparison with the turbuhaler inhaler.

作者信息

Schlaeppi M, Edwards K, Fuller R W, Sharma R

机构信息

Glaxo Research and Development, Uxbridge, Middlesex.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pract. 1996 Jan-Feb;50(1):14-9.

PMID:8729596
Abstract

Asthmatic patients who were regular and experienced users of the metered-dose inhaler (MDI) but with no history of powder inhaler use were interviewed by questionnaire. Most (71%) of the 159 adults recruited had suffered from asthma for more than five years; 89% had used an MDI for more than one year. In all, 153 (97%) found their current MDI easy or very easy to handle. Effectiveness in delivering the drug and ease of operation were the two features of the device they were most satisfied with. The two features 'of an ideal inhaler' rated most highly were the presence of a dose counter and ease of use during an attack (58% and 72% of respondents, respectively). Other important features included hygiene, sensation that a dose had been taken, and small size. When attitudes towards the Diskus inhaler and the Turbuhaler inhaler were compared, 108 (68%) would have been quite or very happy to have a Diskus inhaler prescribed for them, and 79 (50%) a Turbuhaler inhaler. The Diskus inhaler scored significantly better than the Turbuhaler inhaler for knowing how many doses were left, the presence of an attached cover, attractiveness (p < 0.001), hygiene, shape, weight (p = 0.001), and perceived ease of use (p = 0.002). The Turbuhaler inhaler scored significantly better in terms of size (p < 0.001). Overall, the Diskus inhaler was preferred by 104 of 159 patients (p < 0.001), with perceived ease of use, the dose counter, and shape cited as the main reasons for preference.

摘要

通过问卷调查对那些经常且熟练使用定量吸入器(MDI)但无干粉吸入器使用史的哮喘患者进行了访谈。招募的159名成年人中,大多数(71%)患有哮喘超过五年;89%使用MDI超过一年。总体而言,153名(97%)患者认为他们目前使用的MDI易于或非常易于操作。药物递送效果和操作简便性是他们对该设备最满意的两个特点。被评为“理想吸入器”最高的两个特点是有剂量计数器以及在发作时易于使用(分别有58%和72%的受访者提到)。其他重要特点包括卫生、有已吸入一剂的感觉以及体积小。当比较对都保吸入器和准纳器吸入器的态度时,108名(68%)患者表示如果给自己开都保吸入器会相当满意或非常高兴,79名(50%)患者对准纳器吸入器有同样感受。在知晓剩余剂量数量、有附带的盖子、吸引力(p<0.001)、卫生、形状、重量(p = 0.001)以及感知易用性(p = 0.002)方面,都保吸入器的得分显著高于准纳器吸入器。准纳器吸入器在体积方面得分显著更高(p<0.001)。总体而言,159名患者中有104名更喜欢都保吸入器(p<0.001),感知易用性、剂量计数器和形状被列为偏好的主要原因。

相似文献

1
Patient perception of the diskus inhaler: a comparison with the turbuhaler inhaler.患者对都保吸入器的认知:与准纳器吸入器的比较。
Br J Clin Pract. 1996 Jan-Feb;50(1):14-9.
2
Ease of handling and clinical efficacy of fluticasone propionate Accuhaler/Diskus inhaler compared with the Turbohaler inhaler in paediatric patients. UK Study Group.丙酸氟替卡松准纳器/都保吸入器与都保吸入器相比在儿科患者中的操作便利性和临床疗效。英国研究小组。
Br J Clin Pract. 1997 Apr-May;51(3):147-53.
3
Patient perception and acceptability of multidose dry powder inhalers: a randomized crossover comparison of Diskus/Accuhaler with Turbuhaler.患者对多剂量干粉吸入器的认知与接受度:Diskus/Accuhaler与都保的随机交叉比较
J Aerosol Med. 2002 Spring;15(1):59-64. doi: 10.1089/08942680252908584.
4
Acceptance of the Accuhaler, a multi-dose powder inhaler, among asthmatic patients: a comparison with the pressurized metered-dose inhaler.哮喘患者对多剂量粉末吸入器Accuhaler的接受度:与压力定量吸入器的比较。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2000 Sep;18(3):135-40.
5
Patient perceptions of an inhaled asthma medication administered as an inhalation powder via the Diskus or as an inhalation aerosol via a metered-dose inhaler.患者对通过Diskus以吸入粉剂形式给药或通过定量吸入器以吸入气雾剂形式给药的吸入性哮喘药物的看法。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003 Jul;91(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62059-5.
6
Emitted dose estimates from Seretide Diskus and Symbicort Turbuhaler following inhalation by severe asthmatics.重度哮喘患者吸入舒利迭准纳器和信必可都保后的呼出剂量估计值。
Int J Pharm. 2006 Jun 19;316(1-2):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.02.040. Epub 2006 Apr 3.
7
Comparison of patient preference and ease of teaching inhaler technique for Pulmicort Turbuhaler versus pressurized metered-dose inhalers.普米克都保与压力定量吸入器在患者偏好及吸入器技术教学简易程度方面的比较。
J Aerosol Med. 2004 Summer;17(2):129-39. doi: 10.1089/0894268041457174.
8
Inappropriate techniques used by internal medicine residents with three kinds of inhalers (a metered dose inhaler, Diskus, and Turbuhaler): changes after a single teaching session.内科住院医师使用三种吸入器(定量吸入器、都保和准纳器)时的不当操作:单次教学后的变化
J Asthma. 2009 Nov;46(9):944-50. doi: 10.3109/02770900903229701.
9
[The efficacy of Turbuhaler dry powder inhaler in Japanese asthma--measurement of peak inspiratory flow when using Turbuhaler].都保干粉吸入器在日本哮喘患者中的疗效——使用都保时的最大吸气流速测定
Arerugi. 1996 Jul;45(7):649-54.
10
Concurrent use of metered-dose and dry powder inhalers by children with persistent asthma does not adversely affect spacer/inhaler technique.持续性哮喘儿童同时使用定量吸入器和干粉吸入器不会对储雾罐/吸入器技术产生不利影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Oct;40(10):1743-6. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G306. Epub 2006 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Inhaler Technique in Asthma: How Does It Relate to Patients' Preferences and Attitudes Toward Their Inhalers?哮喘患者的吸入器使用技巧:它与患者对吸入器的偏好和态度有何关系?
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2017 Feb;30(1):42-52. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2016.1287. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
2
Comparing usability of NEXThaler(®) with other inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist fixed combination dry powder inhalers in asthma patients.比较 Nexthaler(®)与其他吸入性皮质类固醇/长效β2-激动剂固定剂量干粉吸入器在哮喘患者中的使用情况。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2014 Oct;27(5):363-70. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2013.1086. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
3
The Diskus: a review of its position among dry powder inhaler devices.
都保:干粉吸入装置中的地位综述
Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Jun;61(6):1022-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01382.x.
4
Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of asthma.吸入用沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松联合制剂:用于哮喘管理的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(13):951-89. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321130-00004.
5
Does the inhalation device affect the bronchodilatory dose response curve of salbutamol in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients?吸入装置是否会影响哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者沙丁胺醇的支气管扩张剂量反应曲线?
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Sep;59(5-6):449-55. doi: 10.1007/s00228-003-0614-2. Epub 2003 Aug 12.
6
Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, 1999. Canadian Asthma Consensus Group.《1999年加拿大哮喘共识报告》。加拿大哮喘共识小组。
CMAJ. 1999 Nov 30;161(11 Suppl):S1-61.
7
Once-daily inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma: dry powder inhalers.哮喘儿童每日一次吸入糖皮质激素:干粉吸入器
Drugs. 1999;58 Suppl 4:35-41; discussion 52-3. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199958004-00005.
8
Pectus excavatum: studiously ignored in the United Kingdom?漏斗胸:在英国被刻意忽视了吗?
Arch Dis Child. 2000 Mar;82(3):187-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.82.3.187.
9
How to choose delivery devices for asthma.如何选择哮喘的给药装置
Arch Dis Child. 2000 Mar;82(3):185-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.82.3.185.
10
Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination.沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松复方制剂
Drugs. 1999 Jun;57(6):933-40; discussion 941-3. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957060-00010.