• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中早期预切开与标准胆管插管技术的比较:个人经验

Comparison of early pre-cutting vs standard technique for biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a personal experience.

作者信息

Laohavichitra Kannikar, Akaraviputh Thawatchai, Methasate Asada, Leelakusolvong Somchai, Kachintorn Udom

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Siriraj GI Endoscopy center, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jul 21;13(27):3734-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i27.3734.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v13.i27.3734
PMID:17659735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4250647/
Abstract

AIM

To compare the results and complications of early pre-cutting technique with standard technique.

METHODS

From January 2003 to December 2004, a total of 416 consecutive therapeutic biliary ERCP procedures were performed by one endoscopist (T.A.). Data were retrospectively collected according to procedure indication and results. Of these, 293 procedures (70.4%) were done with standard technique (group A) and 123 procedures (29.6%) with early pre-cutting technique in case of difficult cannulation (group B). The results and complications of ERCP were compared.

RESULTS

Success rate of first attempt cannulation was 98.0% in group A and 87.8% in group B. The overall incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis, hemorrhage, perforation and cholangitis was 0%, 0.2%, 0.5% and 0.5%, respectively. Morbidity rate was not significantly different. No procedure-related mortality was occurred.

CONCLUSION

For an experienced hand, the early pre-cutting technique for biliary cannulation is safe and effective as standard technique.

摘要

目的

比较早期预切开技术与标准技术的结果及并发症。

方法

2003年1月至2004年12月,由一名内镜医师(T.A.)连续进行了416例治疗性胆管内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)手术。根据手术指征和结果回顾性收集数据。其中,293例手术(70.4%)采用标准技术(A组),123例手术(29.6%)在插管困难时采用早期预切开技术(B组)。比较ERCP的结果和并发症。

结果

A组首次插管成功率为98.0%,B组为87.8%。ERCP术后胰腺炎、出血、穿孔和胆管炎的总发生率分别为0%、0.2%、0.5%和0.5%。发病率无显著差异。未发生与手术相关的死亡。

结论

对于经验丰富的操作者,胆管插管的早期预切开技术与标准技术一样安全有效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of early pre-cutting vs standard technique for biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a personal experience.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中早期预切开与标准胆管插管技术的比较:个人经验
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jul 21;13(27):3734-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i27.3734.
2
New precut sphincterotomy for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in difficult biliary duct cannulation.用于困难胆管插管的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的新型预切开括约肌切开术
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug 28;13(32):4385-90. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i32.4385.
3
Comparison between double-guidewire technique and transpancreatic sphincterotomy technique for difficult biliary cannulation.双导丝技术与经胰括约肌切开术在困难胆管插管中的比较。
Dig Endosc. 2015 Mar;27(3):381-7. doi: 10.1111/den.12387. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
4
Early institution of pre-cutting for difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective study comparing conventional vs. a modified technique.困难胆管插管预切开术的早期应用:一项比较传统技术与改良技术的前瞻性研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Nov;62(5):669-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.05.022.
5
Randomized Trial of Endoscopist-Controlled vs. Assistant-Controlled Wire-Guided Cannulation of the Bile Duct.内镜医师控制与助手控制的胆管导丝引导插管随机试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;111(12):1841-1847. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.268. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
6
Needle-knife papillotomy and fistulotomy improved the treatment outcome of patients with difficult biliary cannulation.针刀乳头切开术和瘘管切开术改善了胆管插管困难患者的治疗效果。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5506-5512. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4914-x. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
7
Comparison of sequential pancreatic duct guidewire placement technique and needle knife precut sphincterotomy for difficult biliary cannulation.序贯胰管导丝置入技术与针刀预切开括约肌切开术用于困难胆管插管的比较
J Dig Dis. 2015 Dec;16(12):741-6. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12300.
8
Double guidewire technique vs transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation.双导丝技术与经胰预切开括约肌切开术在困难胆道插管中的比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 7;19(1):108-14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i1.108.
9
Success rate and cannulation time between precut sphincterotomy and double-guidewire technique in truly difficult biliary cannulation.真困难胆道插管中预切开括约肌切开术和双导丝技术的成功率和插管时间。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;27(2):356-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06927.x.
10
Early Precut Sphincterotomy Does Not Increase Risk During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients With Difficult Biliary Access: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.早期预切开括约肌在有困难胆道入路的患者行内镜逆行胰胆管造影时并不会增加风险:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Oct;13(10):1722-1729.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.035. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Early 'shallow' needle-knife papillotomy and guidewire cannulation: an effective and safe approach to difficult papilla.早期“浅”针状刀乳头切开术和导丝插管术:一种处理困难乳头的有效且安全的方法。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2015 May;8(3):114-20. doi: 10.1177/1756283X15576466.
2
Cannulation time is a more accurate measure of cannulation difficulty in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography than the number of attempts.插管时间是比插管次数更能准确衡量内镜逆行胰胆管造影术插管难度的指标。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2013 Nov;1(3):193-7. doi: 10.1093/gastro/got024. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
3
Evaluation of early precut with needle-knife in difficult biliary cannulation during ERCP.评估 ERCP 中困难胆管插管时早期使用针刀行预切开的效果。
Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Dec;58(12):3606-10. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2834-3. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
4
Intraprocedural quality in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中的操作质量:荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov;108(11):1696-704; quiz 1705. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.217. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
5
Early use of needle-knife fistulotomy is safe in situations where difficult biliary cannulation is expected.在预计胆管插管困难的情况下,早期使用针刀窦道切开术是安全的。
Dig Dis Sci. 2012 May;57(5):1384-90. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2030-x. Epub 2012 Jan 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary precutting versus conventional over-the-wire sphincterotomy for bile duct access: a prospective randomized study.用于胆管通路的原发性预切开术与传统的经导丝括约肌切开术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Endoscopy. 2006 Dec;38(12):1235-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944962.
2
Precut papillotomy outcome.预切开乳头括约肌切开术的结果。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005 Nov;15(11):701-3.
3
Early institution of pre-cutting for difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective study comparing conventional vs. a modified technique.困难胆管插管预切开术的早期应用:一项比较传统技术与改良技术的前瞻性研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Nov;62(5):669-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.05.022.
4
A retrospective comparison of outcomes using three different precut needle knife techniques for biliary cannulation.使用三种不同的预切开针刀技术进行胆管插管的结果回顾性比较。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005 Sep;39(8):717-21. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000173928.82986.56.
5
Experience on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at tertiary referral center in Thailand: risks and complications.泰国三级转诊中心的内镜逆行胰胆管造影经验:风险与并发症
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Feb;88(2):238-46.
6
Prospective evaluation of pancreatic sphincterotomy as a precut technique for biliary cannulation.将胰管括约肌切开术作为胆管插管预切开技术的前瞻性评估。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Nov;2(11):971-7. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00484-7.
7
Endoscopic transpancreatic papillary septotomy for inaccessible obstructed bile ducts: Comparison with standard pre-cut papillotomy.内镜下经胰腺乳头间隔切开术治疗难以到达的梗阻性胆管:与标准预切开乳头切开术的比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Oct;60(4):557-61. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01877-2.
8
Needle-knife papillotomy: a safe and effective technique in experienced hands.针刀乳头切开术:在经验丰富者手中是一种安全有效的技术。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Mar-Apr;51(56):349-52.
9
Needle-knife papillotomy: a helpful and safe adjunct to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a selected population.针刀乳头切开术:在特定人群中,是内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的一种有用且安全的辅助手段。
Endoscopy. 1998 Oct;30(8):691-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001390.
10
Long-term consequence of endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones.内镜下括约肌切开术治疗胆管结石的长期后果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Nov;48(5):465-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70086-0.