Suppr超能文献

插管时间是比插管次数更能准确衡量内镜逆行胰胆管造影术插管难度的指标。

Cannulation time is a more accurate measure of cannulation difficulty in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography than the number of attempts.

机构信息

Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2013 Nov;1(3):193-7. doi: 10.1093/gastro/got024. Epub 2013 Aug 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cannulation of the common bile duct (CBD) is the initial and sometime challenging step in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure. Endoscopists often use cannulation attempts and cannulation time to grade cannulation difficulty, but a standard system has yet to be established. The objective of this study was to compare cannulation times with numbers of cannulation attempts, as measures of cannulation difficulty.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study in a tertiary referral center, enrolling 58 patients who were undergoing ERCP for a variety of indications. Cannulation time and the number of cannulation attempts were recorded for each patient. A subset of 14 ERCPs had two observers assessing attempts at cannulation. Cannulation time, number of attempts and inter-observer variability in assessment of attempts were compared and studied.

RESULTS

The degree of agreement between two the methods (cannulation times and number of cannulation attempts) was unacceptable. There were considerable discrepancies between attempt tallies from two observers but the mean difference was statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSION

The grade of cannulation difficulty for a given ERCP procedure may differ when different methods are used (total cannulation time vs number of attempts); thus, grading by different methods should not be used interchangeably. Cannulation time is a more objective and more accurate assessment tool for grading cannulation difficulty than the number of attempts to cannulate the papilla.

摘要

背景

胆管插管是内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)过程中的初始步骤,有时也是具有挑战性的步骤。内镜医生通常使用插管尝试和插管时间来分级插管难度,但尚未建立标准系统。本研究的目的是比较插管时间和插管次数作为插管难度的衡量指标。

方法

我们在一家三级转诊中心进行了一项前瞻性研究,纳入了 58 名因各种原因接受 ERCP 的患者。记录每位患者的插管时间和插管次数。有 14 例 ERCP 由两名观察者评估插管尝试。比较和研究了插管时间、尝试次数和观察者间评估尝试的变异性。

结果

两种方法(插管时间和插管次数)之间的一致性程度不可接受。两名观察者的尝试计数存在很大差异,但平均差异无统计学意义。

结论

对于给定的 ERCP 程序,使用不同的方法(总插管时间与插管次数)可能会导致插管难度的分级不同;因此,不应交替使用不同的分级方法。与尝试插管的次数相比,插管时间是一种更客观、更准确的评估工具,用于分级插管难度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验