Pureswaran Deepa S, Sullivan Brian T, Ayres Matthew P
Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Naturwissenschaften. 2008 Jan;95(1):33-44. doi: 10.1007/s00114-007-0292-5. Epub 2007 Jul 28.
Aggregation via pheromone signalling is essential for tree-killing bark beetles to overcome tree defenses and reproduce within hosts. Pheromone production is a trait that is linked to fitness, so high individual variation is paradoxical. One explanation is that the technique of measuring static pheromone pools overestimates true variation among individuals. An alternative hypothesis is that aggregation behaviour dilutes the contribution of individuals to the trait under selection and reduces the efficacy of natural selection on pheromone production by individuals. We compared pheromone measurements from traditional hindgut extractions of female southern pine beetles with those obtained by aerating individuals till they died. Aerations showed greater total pheromone production than hindgut extractions, but coefficients of variation (CV) remained high (60-182%) regardless of collection technique. This leaves the puzzle of high variation unresolved. A novel but simple explanation emerges from considering bark beetle aggregation behaviour. The phenotype visible to natural selection is the collective pheromone plume from hundreds of colonisers. The influence of a single beetle on this plume is enhanced by high variation among individuals but constrained by large group sizes. We estimated the average contribution of an individual to the pheromone plume across a range of aggregation sizes and showed that large aggregation sizes typical in mass attacks limit the potential of natural selection because each individual has so little effect on the overall plume. Genetic variation in pheromone production could accumulate via mutation and recombination, despite strong effects of the pheromone plume on the fitness of individuals within the aggregation. Thus, aggregation behaviour, by limiting the efficacy of natural selection, can allow the persistence of extreme phenotypes in nature.
通过信息素信号进行聚集对于杀死树木的树皮甲虫克服树木防御并在宿主内繁殖至关重要。信息素产生是一种与适应性相关的性状,因此个体差异很大这一点自相矛盾。一种解释是,测量静态信息素库的技术高估了个体之间的真实差异。另一种假设是,聚集行为稀释了个体对选择性状的贡献,并降低了自然选择对个体信息素产生的效力。我们将南方松甲虫雌虫传统后肠提取物中的信息素测量结果与通过给个体通气直至其死亡获得的结果进行了比较。通气显示出的信息素总产量高于后肠提取物,但无论采用何种收集技术,变异系数(CV)仍然很高(60 - 182%)。这使得高变异的谜题仍未得到解决。从考虑树皮甲虫的聚集行为中出现了一个新颖但简单的解释。自然选择可见的表型是来自数百只殖民者的集体信息素羽流。个体之间的高变异增强了单个甲虫对该羽流的影响,但大群体规模对其有制约作用。我们估计了在一系列聚集规模下个体对信息素羽流的平均贡献,并表明大规模攻击中典型的大聚集规模限制了自然选择的潜力,因为每个个体对整体羽流的影响很小。尽管信息素羽流对聚集内个体的适应性有强烈影响,但信息素产生的遗传变异仍可通过突变和重组积累。因此,聚集行为通过限制自然选择的效力,可以使极端表型在自然界中持续存在。