Guo Jeff J, Keck Paul E, Li Hong, Patel Nick C
Division of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences, College of Pharmacy and the Institute for the Study of Health, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, 3225 Eden Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0004, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Aug;58(8):1073-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.8.1073.
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed costs among patients with bipolar disorder for treatment related to bipolar disorder and to comorbid conditions. Risk factors associated with costs were also assessed. METHODS: Data (January 1998 to December 2002) were from a seven-state Medicaid managed care claims database for 13,471 patients who had received a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, most of whom received medications. Each medical claims cost was adjusted by the medical component of the Consumer Price Index as the dollar value in 2002. In a Poisson regression analysis, treatment costs per enrollment month were regressed on patient's age, gender, medications, and clinical comorbidities. RESULTS: Bipolar disorder treatment accounted for 30% of costs and comorbid disorders for 70%. Key cost components were inpatient care (35%), outpatient care (16%), prescriptions (13%), and physician encounters (11%). Patients with bipolar disorder received a variety of medications: lithium, 13%; anticonvulsants, 35%; second-generation antipsychotics, 24%; first-generation antipsychotics, 22%; and antidepressants, 42%. Compared with the costs for patients receiving antidepressants alone or no medication, the high costs for bipolar disorder treatment and overall treatment were associated with use of second-generation antipsychotics (rate ratio [RR]=1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.58-1.86 and RR=1.26, CI=1.18-1.34, respectively) and use of anticonvulsants (RR=1.37, CI=1.26-1.48 and RR=1.06, CI=1.00-1.12). Higher costs were significantly associated with key comorbidities, such as drug abuse (RR=1.58, CI=1.47-1.70), cerebral-vascular disease (RR=1.72, CI=1.51-1.94), ischemic heart disease (RR=1.47, CI=1.30-1.66), and hypertension (RR=1.44, CI=1.33-1.56). CONCLUSIONS: Cost-containment efforts may need to manage or prevent key comorbidities among patients with bipolar disorder and to evaluate the association between antipsychotic use and treatment outcomes and hospital services.
目的:本研究评估了双相情感障碍患者与双相情感障碍及共病相关的治疗费用。还评估了与费用相关的风险因素。 方法:数据(1998年1月至2002年12月)来自一个七州医疗补助管理式医疗索赔数据库,涉及13471名被诊断为双相情感障碍的患者,其中大多数接受了药物治疗。每项医疗索赔费用根据消费者价格指数的医疗成分进行调整,以反映2002年的美元价值。在泊松回归分析中,将每个登记月的治疗费用作为因变量,患者的年龄、性别、药物治疗和临床共病作为自变量进行回归分析。 结果:双相情感障碍治疗费用占总费用的30%,共病费用占70%。主要费用组成部分为住院治疗(35%)、门诊治疗(16%)、处方(13%)和医生诊疗(11%)。双相情感障碍患者使用了多种药物:锂盐,13%;抗惊厥药,35%;第二代抗精神病药物,24%;第一代抗精神病药物,22%;抗抑郁药,42%。与单独使用抗抑郁药或未用药的患者相比,双相情感障碍治疗和总体治疗的高费用与使用第二代抗精神病药物(率比[RR]=1.71,95%置信区间[CI]=1.58 - 1.86;总体治疗RR=1.26,CI=1.18 - 1.34)以及使用抗惊厥药(RR=1.37,CI=1.26 - 1.48;总体治疗RR=1.06,CI=1.00 - 1.12)有关。较高费用与关键共病显著相关,如药物滥用(RR=1.58,CI=1.47 - 1.70)、脑血管疾病(RR=1.72,CI=1.51 - 1.94)、缺血性心脏病(RR=1.47,CI=1.30 - 1.66)和高血压(RR=1.44,CI=1.33 - 1.56)。 结论:成本控制措施可能需要管理或预防双相情感障碍患者的关键共病,并评估抗精神病药物使用与治疗结果及医院服务之间的关联。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2010-6
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010
Am J Prev Med. 2017-12
J Affect Disord. 2017-10-1
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2017-2-10
Matern Child Health J. 2017-4
Community Ment Health J. 2017-1
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015-4