• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未选择的直肠癌患者行腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术:对早期结局的影响

Laparoscopic vs. open total mesorectal excision in unselected patients with rectal cancer: impact on early outcome.

作者信息

Staudacher Carlo, Vignali Andrea, Saverio Di Palo, Elena Orsenigo, Andrea Tamburini

机构信息

Department of Surgery, San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Sep;50(9):1324-31. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0289-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10350-007-0289-3
PMID:17665258
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare laparoscopic vs. open total mesorectal excision for cancer of the rectum on perioperative outcome and quality of life.

METHODS

A total of 187 consecutive unselected patients with rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision during a seven-year period were prospectively evaluated. Patients were monitored 30 days for postoperative complications. Quality of life was evaluated before and at one year after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision, whereas 79 underwent open. Conversion rate was 12 percent. In the laparoscopic group, operating time was 33 minutes longer (P = 0.03) and intraoperative blood loss was lower (P = 0.001). Tumor stage and the number of lymph nodes that were intraoperatively collected were similar in the two groups. The overall morbidity rate was 29.6 percent in the laparoscopic and 27.8 percent in the open (P = 0.78) group. No patient died during the postoperative period. Anastomotic leak rate was similar in the two groups (14.8 percent in laparoscopic vs. 12.6 percent in open; P = 0.88). Patients in the laparoscopic group recovered earlier bowel function (P = 0.01) and experienced a shorter length of stay (P = 0.003). At one-year follow-up, overall quality of life was similar in the two groups. In the laparoscopic group, social functioning item was significantly better (P = 0.05) and trend to a better physical status was observed (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision is safe and feasible, does not jeopardize the complication rate, and has the benefits of much less blood during the operation and shorter hospitalization.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的围手术期结局和生活质量。

方法

前瞻性评估了在7年期间连续接受全直肠系膜切除术的187例未经选择的直肠癌患者。对患者进行30天的术后并发症监测。在手术前和术后1年评估生活质量。

结果

共有108例患者接受了腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术,而79例接受了开放手术。中转率为12%。在腹腔镜组中,手术时间长33分钟(P = 0.03),术中失血量少(P = 0.001)。两组的肿瘤分期和术中采集的淋巴结数量相似。腹腔镜组的总体发病率为29.6%,开放组为27.8%(P = 0.78)。术后期间无患者死亡。两组的吻合口漏率相似(腹腔镜组为14.8%,开放组为12.6%;P = 0.88)。腹腔镜组患者的肠功能恢复较早(P = 0.01),住院时间较短(P = 0.003)。在1年随访时,两组的总体生活质量相似。在腹腔镜组中,社会功能项目明显更好(P = 0.05),并且观察到身体状况有改善的趋势(P = 0.07)。

结论

腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术安全可行,不增加并发症发生率,且具有术中出血少、住院时间短的优点。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic vs. open total mesorectal excision in unselected patients with rectal cancer: impact on early outcome.未选择的直肠癌患者行腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术:对早期结局的影响
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Sep;50(9):1324-31. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0289-3.
2
Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗中高位直肠癌前切除术:疗效评估
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Aug;49(8):1108-15. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0551-0.
3
Prospective evaluation of quality of life and sexual functioning after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术后生活质量和性功能的前瞻性评估。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Feb;50(2):147-55. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0791-z.
4
[Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for the middle-lower rectal cancer: a clinical comparative study].腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的临床对比研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Nov;12(6):573-6.
5
Laparoscopic vs. open total mesorectal excision for treatment of rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的比较
Rev Invest Clin. 2008 May-Jun;60(3):205-11.
6
Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision: a comparative study on short-term outcomes. A single-institution experience regarding anterior resections and abdominoperineal resections.腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术:短期结局的比较研究。关于前切除术和腹会阴联合切除术的单机构经验。
Dig Surg. 2007;24(5):367-74. doi: 10.1159/000107778. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
7
Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision: a nonrandomized comparative prospective trial in a tertiary center in Mexico City.腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术:墨西哥城一家三级中心的非随机对照前瞻性试验
Am Surg. 2009 Jan;75(1):33-8.
8
Short-term outcome after laparoscopic or open restorative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative cohort study.腹腔镜或开放手术行直肠系膜全切除术治疗直肠癌的短期疗效:一项比较队列研究
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Feb;50(2):176-83. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0751-7.
9
Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis.直肠癌患者的腹腔镜切除术:疗效及成本效益分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Apr;50(4):464-71. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0798-5.
10
Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy.腹腔镜与开放半结肠切除术
Minerva Chir. 2003 Aug;58(4):491-502, 502-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopy is non-inferior to open surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗直肠癌的非劣效性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(13):e7363. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7363.
2
Oxidative Stress Level as a Predictor of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Surgery.氧化应激水平作为直肠手术后吻合口漏的预测因子。
Mediators Inflamm. 2021 Jun 28;2021:9968642. doi: 10.1155/2021/9968642. eCollection 2021.
3
Similarities and differences between study designs in short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, case-matched, and cohort studies.
腹腔镜与开放直肠癌低位前切除术短期和长期结局研究设计的异同:一项对随机、病例匹配和队列研究的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Nov 21;5(2):183-193. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12409. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Robotic low anterior resection for a distal sigmoid colon cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic- a video vignette.新冠疫情期间机器人辅助低位前切除术治疗乙状结肠远端癌——视频病例
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;22(9):1031. doi: 10.1111/codi.15310. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
5
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME): single-centre early experience in a selected population.
Updates Surg. 2019 Mar;71(1):157-163. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0602-9. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
6
Comparison of long-term oncologic outcomes of stage III colorectal cancer following laparoscopic versus open surgery.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗III期结直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局比较。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015 Jan;88(1):8-14. doi: 10.4174/astr.2015.88.1.8. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
7
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: long-term results.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗腹膜外直肠癌:长期结果
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Dec;29(12):1493-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2017-5. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
8
Multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer in 2014: where are we going?2014年直肠癌的多学科治疗:我们正走向何方?
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 28;20(32):11249-61. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11249.
9
Quality of life after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer.腹腔镜结肠癌切除术后的生活质量。
JSLS. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):225-35. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13753907291152.
10
Laparoscopy for extraperitoneal rectal cancer reduces short-term morbidity: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜治疗腹膜外直肠癌可降低短期发病率:系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2013 Feb;1(1):32-47. doi: 10.1177/2050640612473753.