Weymouth S, Davey C, Wright J I, Nieuwoudt L-A, Barclay L, Belton S, Svenson S, Bowell L
Yirrkala Health Service, Nhulunbuy, Northern Territory, Australia.
Rural Remote Health. 2007 Jul-Sep;7(3):652. Epub 2007 Jul 31.
Australian remote area nurses (RANs) are specialist advanced practice nurses. They work in unique, challenging and sometimes dangerous environments to provide a diverse range of healthcare services to remote and predominantly Aboriginal communities. There is an emerging skills gap in the remote nursing workforce as experienced and qualified RANs leave this demanding practice. There is a shortage of new nurses interested in working in these areas, and many of those who enter remote practice leave after a short time. Distance management was examined in order to gain a better understanding of its effects on the retention of RANs in the Australian states of Northern Territory (NT), Western Australia (WA) and South Australia (SA). Distance management in this context occurs when the health service's line management team is located geographically distant from the workplace they are managing.
The study used a mixed method design, with a combination of anonymous surveys and interviews conducted by telephone and face to face. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected. The data were thematically analysed and basic descriptive statistics were also used. All RANs who worked in government and other non-Aboriginal controlled remote health services in NT, SA and WA were included in the sample. Sixty-one RANs (anonymous survey, 55% response rate) and 26 ex-RANs (telephone interview) participated in the research. The ex-RANs were sampled using a snowball technique where interviewees recommended former colleagues for interview. Nine nursing executives with expertise in distance management of remote health services also contributed (face-to-face interview), and they are referred to as 'the experts'.
Respondents expressed a dichotomy in their reactions to remote area nursing. On one hand, they expressed a strong sense of pleasure and satisfaction in the nature of their work; while, on the other, they expressed dissatisfaction with aspects of infrastructure, support and management practices. Positive aspects included autonomy of practice, working in a small team, cross-cultural practice, and the beauty and isolation of the setting. Negative aspects included poor orientation, high stress, inadequate resources, poor systems, unrealistic expectations from communities and managers leading to excessive workload, and perceived lack of support from management. The greatest negative issue raised was poor handling of leave replacement, where RANs on leave were not replaced with appropriately qualified and skilled nurses. Respondents noted a frequent change in managers, and reported that the lack of stability in management contributed to lack of support for both RANs and their managers. Lack of support from managers was frequently cited as a main cause for ex-RANs leaving their employment. Despite this, almost all respondents indicated a willingness to remain in the remote workforce if possible. Experts noted that where management was dysfunctional, RAN retention rates fell. They also acknowledged the need for good communication, interpersonal skills, availability of staff development, leave, relief staff, feedback, debriefing, professional support and working conditions. Experts believed managers should make use of available and emerging technology to communicate with RANs, and work to improve RANs' understanding of the role of the management team.
Remote Australian Aboriginal communities are mainly served by RANs in a health system that is sometimes ill-equipped and at times poorly managed. The theme of a second-class health system being serviced by RANs who felt they were treated as second-class health practitioners appeared throughout the data. Poor distance management practices may contribute to the high turnover of staff in remote Australia. Retention of RANs may increase with better managerial practices, such as effective communication and leadership, staffing replacement and leave, prompt attention to infrastructure issues, and staff development and appraisal. These are the keys to ensuring that RANs feel supported and valued. Remote area nursing is a rewarding career and, with systemic support, RANs may stay longer in remote practice.
澳大利亚偏远地区护士(RANs)是专科高级执业护士。他们在独特、具有挑战性且有时危险的环境中工作,为偏远且主要是原住民社区提供各种医疗服务。随着经验丰富且资质合格的偏远地区护士离开这种高要求的工作,偏远护理劳动力中出现了技能差距。对在这些地区工作感兴趣的新护士短缺,而且许多进入偏远地区工作的人在短时间后就离开了。为了更好地了解远程管理对澳大利亚北领地(NT)、西澳大利亚(WA)和南澳大利亚(SA)偏远地区护士留任意愿的影响,对远程管理进行了研究。在此背景下,当卫生服务的直属管理团队与他们所管理的工作场所在地理上相距甚远时,就会出现远程管理。
该研究采用混合方法设计,结合了匿名调查以及电话和面对面访谈。收集了定性和定量数据。对数据进行了主题分析,并使用了基本描述性统计方法。样本包括在北领地、南澳大利亚和西澳大利亚政府及其他非原住民控制的偏远卫生服务机构工作的所有偏远地区护士。61名偏远地区护士(匿名调查,回复率55%)和26名前偏远地区护士(电话访谈)参与了研究。前偏远地区护士采用滚雪球技术抽样,即受访者推荐前同事接受访谈。九名在偏远卫生服务远程管理方面具有专业知识的护理管理人员也参与其中(面对面访谈),他们被称为“专家”。
受访者对偏远地区护理的反应存在二分法。一方面,他们对工作性质表达了强烈的愉悦感和满足感;另一方面,他们对基础设施、支持和管理实践方面表示不满。积极方面包括实践自主权、在小团队中工作、跨文化实践以及工作环境的美丽与与世隔绝。消极方面包括入职培训不足、压力大、资源不足、系统不完善、社区和管理人员的不切实际期望导致工作量过大,以及感觉缺乏管理层的支持。提出的最大负面问题是休假替代安排不佳,即休假的偏远地区护士没有被具备适当资质和技能的护士替代。受访者指出管理人员频繁更换,并报告说管理缺乏稳定性导致对偏远地区护士及其管理人员都缺乏支持。管理人员缺乏支持经常被列为前偏远地区护士离职的主要原因。尽管如此,几乎所有受访者都表示如果可能愿意留在偏远地区工作。专家指出,管理不善时,偏远地区护士的留用率会下降。他们还承认需要良好的沟通、人际交往技能、员工发展机会、休假、替班人员、反馈、汇报、专业支持和工作条件。专家认为管理人员应利用现有和新兴技术与偏远地区护士沟通,并努力提高偏远地区护士对管理团队角色的理解。
澳大利亚偏远原住民社区主要由偏远地区护士提供卫生服务,而该卫生系统有时设备不足,管理不善。数据中始终出现这样的主题:一个二流的卫生系统由感觉自己被当作二流卫生从业者对待的偏远地区护士提供服务。糟糕的远程管理实践可能导致澳大利亚偏远地区员工流动率高。通过更好的管理实践,如有效的沟通和领导、人员替换和休假安排、及时关注基础设施问题以及员工发展和评估,偏远地区护士的留用率可能会提高。这些是确保偏远地区护士感到得到支持和重视的关键。偏远地区护理是一项有意义的职业,在系统支持下,偏远地区护士可能会在偏远地区工作更长时间。