Suppr超能文献

验证忧郁症抑郁症的尝试:对现代研究方法的一些观察

Attempts to validate melancholic depression: some observations on modern research methodology.

作者信息

Rasmussen Keith G

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Bull Menninger Clin. 2007 Spring;71(2):150-63. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2007.71.2.150.

Abstract

The use of the word "melancholia" or its variants is quite old in the English language, originally referring to a variety of dysphoric states of everyday life. With the development of psychiatry as a branch of medicine in the late 18th century, melancholia was used in a medical context to describe morbid states of depressed mood and associated features. The concept of melancholia as a specific subtype of a broader illness known as "depressive disorder" is fairly recent in modern psychiatry, arising predominantly in Great Britain and becoming a formal part of mood disorder nosology in 1980 with the DSM-III. Despite attempts to validate the concept of melancholia as an illness separate from nonmelancholic depression, no consensus has been reached. In this article, the author outlines what he believes are methodological problems that have been common in research studies to validate melancholia.

摘要

“忧郁症”一词或其变体在英语中的使用由来已久,最初指日常生活中的各种烦躁不安状态。随着18世纪后期精神病学作为医学分支的发展,“忧郁症”在医学语境中被用于描述情绪低落的病态状态及相关特征。在现代精神病学中,将忧郁症视为一种更广泛疾病“抑郁症”的特定亚型这一概念相当新,主要起源于英国,并在1980年随着《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)成为心境障碍分类学的正式组成部分。尽管有人试图证实忧郁症作为一种与非忧郁症性抑郁症相区分的疾病这一概念,但尚未达成共识。在本文中,作者概述了他认为在验证忧郁症的研究中常见的方法学问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验