Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, kbo-Lech-Mangfall-Klinik, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Mar;27(1). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1569. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
Subtyping depression is important in order to further delineate biological causes of depressive syndromes. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and outcome characteristics of distinct subtypes of depression and to assess proportion and features of patients fulfilling criteria for more than one subtype. Melancholic, atypical and anxious subtypes of depression were assessed in a naturalistic sample of 833 inpatients using DSM-IV specifiers based on operationalized criteria. Baseline characteristics and outcome criteria at discharge were compared between distinct subtypes and their overlap. A substantial proportion of patients (16%) were classified with more than one subtype of depression, 28% were of the distinct anxious, 7% of the distinct atypical and 5% of the distinct melancholic subtype. Distinct melancholic patients had shortest duration of episode, highest baseline depression severity, but were more often early improvers; distinct anxious patients had higher NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) neuroticism scores compared with patients with unspecific subtype. Melancholic patients with overlap of anxious features had worse treatment outcome compared to distinct melancholic and distinct anxious subtype. Distinct subtypes differed in only few variables and patients with overlap of depression subtypes may have independent clinical and outcome characteristics. Studies investigating biological causes of subtypes of depression should take influence of features of other subtypes into account.
对抑郁症进行亚型划分,对于进一步明确抑郁综合征的生物学病因非常重要。本研究旨在评估不同抑郁亚型的临床和结局特征,并评估符合一种以上亚型标准的患者的比例和特征。在一项使用基于操作性标准的 DSM-IV 特征的自然样本中,对 833 名住院患者进行了抑郁的忧郁型、非典型型和焦虑型的评估。在不同亚型之间及其重叠部分,比较了基线特征和出院时的结局标准。相当一部分患者(16%)被归类为多种抑郁亚型,28%为明显的焦虑型,7%为明显的非典型型,5%为明显的忧郁型。明显忧郁型患者的发病持续时间最短,基线抑郁严重程度最高,但往往早期改善;明显焦虑型患者的 NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) 神经质得分高于非特定亚型患者。具有焦虑特征重叠的忧郁型患者的治疗结局较明显忧郁型和明显焦虑型患者差。不同亚型仅在少数变量上存在差异,具有抑郁亚型重叠的患者可能具有独立的临床和结局特征。研究抑郁症亚型的生物学原因时,应考虑到其他亚型的特征的影响。