Salminen Paulina T P, Hiekkanen Heikki I, Rantala Arto P T, Ovaska Jari T
Department of Surgery, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Ann Surg. 2007 Aug;246(2):201-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000263508.53334.af.
The aim of this study was to compare the long-term objective and subjective outcomes of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication in a randomized clinical trial with an 11-year follow-up.
Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has become the method of choice in antireflux surgery, replacing its open counterpart despite the lack of long-term results from controlled clinical studies.
Between April 1992 and June 1995, 110 consecutive patients were randomized to either laparoscopic (LAP) or conventional (open) Nissen fundoplication. The objective long-term follow-up consisted of an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and a clinical assessment; the subjective long-term outcome was investigated by personal interviews using a structured questionnaire.
Forty-nine patients in the LAP group and 37 patients in the open group were available for evaluation. Late subjective results, including postoperative symptoms and evaluation of the surgical result, were similar in both groups. With the benefit of hindsight, 73.7% of the patients in the open group and 81.8% in the LAP group would again choose surgical treatment (P = 0.3042). In the LAP group, there were 5 (13.2%) partially or totally disrupted plications compared with the 14 (40.0%) disrupted plications in the open group (P = 0.0152). There were 10 incisional hernias in the open group compared with none in the LAP group (P < 0.001).
At long-term follow-up, the open and LAP approaches for the Nissen fundoplication have similar long-term subjective symptomatic outcome despite the significantly higher incidence of incisional hernias and defective fundic wraps at endoscopy in the open group defining laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication as the procedure of choice in surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
本研究的目的是在一项长达11年随访的随机临床试验中,比较腹腔镜下和开放式Nissen胃底折叠术的长期客观和主观结果。
腹腔镜下Nissen胃底折叠术已成为抗反流手术的首选方法,尽管缺乏对照临床研究的长期结果,但已取代了开放式手术。
在1992年4月至1995年6月期间,110例连续患者被随机分为腹腔镜组(LAP)或传统(开放式)Nissen胃底折叠术组。客观的长期随访包括上消化道内镜检查和临床评估;主观的长期结果通过使用结构化问卷进行个人访谈来调查。
LAP组有49例患者,开放组有37例患者可供评估。两组的晚期主观结果,包括术后症状和手术结果评估,相似。事后看来,开放组73.7%的患者和LAP组81.8%的患者会再次选择手术治疗(P = 0.3042)。LAP组有5例(13.2%)折叠部分或完全破裂,而开放组有14例(40.0%)折叠破裂(P = 0.0152)。开放组有10例切口疝,而LAP组无(P < 0.001)。
在长期随访中,Nissen胃底折叠术的开放和LAP方法具有相似的长期主观症状结果,尽管开放组切口疝的发生率显著更高,且内镜检查时胃底包裹有缺陷,这使得腹腔镜下Nissen胃底折叠术成为胃食管反流病手术治疗的首选方法。