Wakefield Jon
Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Aug;81(2):208-27. doi: 10.1086/519024. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
In light of the vast amounts of genomic data that are now being generated, we propose a new measure, the Bayesian false-discovery probability (BFDP), for assessing the noteworthiness of an observed association. BFDP shares the ease of calculation of the recently proposed false-positive report probability (FPRP) but uses more information, has a noteworthy threshold defined naturally in terms of the costs of false discovery and nondiscovery, and has a sound methodological foundation. In addition, in a multiple-testing situation, it is straightforward to estimate the expected numbers of false discoveries and false nondiscoveries. We provide an in-depth discussion of FPRP, including a comparison with the q value, and examine the empirical behavior of these measures, along with BFDP, via simulation. Finally, we use BFDP to assess the association between 131 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and lung cancer in a case-control study.
鉴于目前正在生成的大量基因组数据,我们提出了一种新的度量方法——贝叶斯错误发现概率(BFDP),用于评估观察到的关联的显著性。BFDP具有最近提出的假阳性报告概率(FPRP)易于计算的特点,但使用了更多信息,有一个根据错误发现和未发现的成本自然定义的显著阈值,并且有坚实的方法学基础。此外,在多重检验的情况下,很容易估计错误发现和错误未发现的预期数量。我们对FPRP进行了深入讨论,包括与q值的比较,并通过模拟研究了这些度量方法以及BFDP的实证行为。最后,我们在一项病例对照研究中使用BFDP评估了131个单核苷酸多态性与肺癌之间的关联。