Suppr超能文献

遗传流行病学研究中错误发现概率的贝叶斯度量。

A Bayesian measure of the probability of false discovery in genetic epidemiology studies.

作者信息

Wakefield Jon

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Aug;81(2):208-27. doi: 10.1086/519024. Epub 2007 Jul 3.

Abstract

In light of the vast amounts of genomic data that are now being generated, we propose a new measure, the Bayesian false-discovery probability (BFDP), for assessing the noteworthiness of an observed association. BFDP shares the ease of calculation of the recently proposed false-positive report probability (FPRP) but uses more information, has a noteworthy threshold defined naturally in terms of the costs of false discovery and nondiscovery, and has a sound methodological foundation. In addition, in a multiple-testing situation, it is straightforward to estimate the expected numbers of false discoveries and false nondiscoveries. We provide an in-depth discussion of FPRP, including a comparison with the q value, and examine the empirical behavior of these measures, along with BFDP, via simulation. Finally, we use BFDP to assess the association between 131 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and lung cancer in a case-control study.

摘要

鉴于目前正在生成的大量基因组数据,我们提出了一种新的度量方法——贝叶斯错误发现概率(BFDP),用于评估观察到的关联的显著性。BFDP具有最近提出的假阳性报告概率(FPRP)易于计算的特点,但使用了更多信息,有一个根据错误发现和未发现的成本自然定义的显著阈值,并且有坚实的方法学基础。此外,在多重检验的情况下,很容易估计错误发现和错误未发现的预期数量。我们对FPRP进行了深入讨论,包括与q值的比较,并通过模拟研究了这些度量方法以及BFDP的实证行为。最后,我们在一项病例对照研究中使用BFDP评估了131个单核苷酸多态性与肺癌之间的关联。

相似文献

6
A critique of the false-positive report probability.对假阳性报告概率的批判。
Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;33(2):145-50. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20363.
10
Nonparametric bayesian estimation of positive false discovery rates.阳性错误发现率的非参数贝叶斯估计。
Biometrics. 2007 Dec;63(4):1126-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00819.x. Epub 2007 May 14.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Genetic association studies.基因关联研究。
Lancet. 2005;366(9491):1121-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67424-7.
7
Why most published research findings are false.为何大多数已发表的研究结果是错误的。
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. Epub 2005 Aug 30.
8
Genetic association studies: time for a new paradigm?基因关联研究:是时候采用新范式了吗?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Jun;14(6):1359-60. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0403.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验