Karagounis Apostolos, Asimakopoulos George, Niranjan Gunaratnam, Valencia Oswaldo, Chandrasekaran Venkatachalam
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St George's Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2006 Jun;5(3):222-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2005.117465. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
Off-pump coronary revascularisation is demanding technically as the surgeon is faced with a beating heart and not a bloodless field. The potential clinical advantages of off-pump coronary revascularisation have made this procedure an essential part of a cardiothoracic training program. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of teaching trainees complex off-pump coronary artery surgery (arterial grafting, 'Y' grafts, sequential grafting and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass) on clinical outcomes.
All 323 off-pump coronary revascularisation cases performed by one service over a 24-month period were analysed. The 125 (39%) operations performed by two trainees with previous exposure in on-pump surgery were compared with the 198 (61%) performed by an experienced consultant surgeon. Patient and disease characteristics, intra- and post-operative data, morbidity and mortality were analysed using uni- and multivariate analysis.
The trainees performed 51% of the MIDCABs, 36% of the 'Y' grafts and 27.5% of the sequential grafts. The internal thoracic artery was used in 96% of the cases, radial artery in 49% and bilateral internal thoracic arteries in 11% equally distributed between trainees and consultant. The average number of grafts per case was 3.7 for the consultant and 3.3 for the trainees. Patients operated by the consultants were more likely to have unstable angina (P=0.008), ejection fraction <30% (P=0.01) previous cardiac surgery (P=0.027) and more likely to receive over 4 grafts (P=0.01). Operative mortality was 1.5% for the consultant and 0 for the trainees (P=0.17). Post-operative morbidity, such as re-operation for bleeding (consultant 1% vs. trainee 0.8%), stroke (0.5% vs. 0.8%), haemofiltration (3.5% vs. 0.8%) was similar between the two groups. Hospital stay was also similar.
The results of this study suggest that trainees under supervision perform complex off-pump coronary artery surgery safely with low rate of mortality and complications. These findings are in agreement with previous literature reports. Trainees should be allowed to operate on sufficient number of patients undergoing off-pump surgery according to their skills and abilities. Patients should be reassured that safety is not compromised by the presence of a trainee as a primary surgeon.
非体外循环冠状动脉血运重建术在技术上要求很高,因为外科医生面对的是跳动的心脏而非无血术野。非体外循环冠状动脉血运重建术潜在的临床优势使其成为心胸外科培训计划的重要组成部分。本研究的目的是调查培训学员进行复杂的非体外循环冠状动脉手术(动脉搭桥、“Y”形搭桥、序贯搭桥和微创直接冠状动脉搭桥)对临床结果的影响。
分析了一个医疗团队在24个月内进行的所有323例非体外循环冠状动脉血运重建病例。将两名曾有体外循环手术经验的学员进行的125例(39%)手术与一位经验丰富的顾问外科医生进行的198例(61%)手术进行比较。使用单因素和多因素分析对患者和疾病特征、术中和术后数据、发病率和死亡率进行分析。
学员完成了51%的微创直接冠状动脉搭桥手术、36%的“Y”形搭桥手术和27.5%的序贯搭桥手术。96%的病例使用了胸廓内动脉,49%使用了桡动脉,11%使用了双侧胸廓内动脉,学员和顾问之间分布均匀。顾问医生每例平均搭桥数量为3.7根,学员为3.3根。顾问医生手术的患者更可能患有不稳定型心绞痛(P=0.008)、射血分数<30%(P=0.01)、既往有心脏手术史(P=0.027),且更可能接受超过4根搭桥(P=0.01)。顾问医生的手术死亡率为1.5%,学员为0(P=0.17)。两组术后发病率相似,如因出血再次手术(顾问医生1%对学员0.8%)、中风(0.5%对0.8%)、血液滤过(3.5%对0.8%)。住院时间也相似。
本研究结果表明,在监督下的学员能够安全地进行复杂的非体外循环冠状动脉手术,死亡率和并发症发生率较低。这些发现与先前的文献报道一致。应允许学员根据其技能和能力为足够数量的非体外循环手术患者进行手术。应让患者放心,由学员担任主刀医生不会影响安全性。