• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

圣巴巴拉县医疗数据交换:发生了什么?

The Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange: what happened?

作者信息

Miller Robert H, Miller Bradley S

机构信息

Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w568-80. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w568. Epub 2007 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w568
PMID:17670775
Abstract

The Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange was once one of the most ambitious and publicized U.S. health information exchange (HIE) efforts. Eight years after its inception, and several months after providing some data, the Santa Barbara Project shut down operations. Despite its developed HIE infrastructure, participants found no compelling value proposition in initial HIE services. Even with fewer technology delays and more community leadership, other regional health information organizations (RHIOs) may also stumble over HIE service-value propositions without some combination of grants, incentives, and mandates that develop initial RHIO infrastructure and services and ensure provision of unprofitable yet socially valuable services.

摘要

圣巴巴拉县医疗数据交换曾是美国最雄心勃勃且备受瞩目的健康信息交换(HIE)项目之一。在其成立八年后,以及提供了一些数据几个月后,圣巴巴拉项目停止了运营。尽管其健康信息交换基础设施已建成,但参与者在最初的健康信息交换服务中未发现有令人信服的价值主张。即使技术延误减少且社区领导力增强,若没有拨款、激励措施和指令的某种组合来发展最初的区域健康信息组织基础设施及服务,并确保提供无利可图但具有社会价值的服务,其他区域健康信息组织(RHIOs)在健康信息交换服务价值主张方面也可能会遇到困难。

相似文献

1
The Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange: what happened?圣巴巴拉县医疗数据交换:发生了什么?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w568-80. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w568. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
2
Retrospective: lessons learned from the Santa Barbara project and their implications for health information exchange.回顾性研究:从圣巴巴拉项目中吸取的经验教训及其对健康信息交换的启示
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w589-91. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w589. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
3
Another lesson from Santa Barbara.来自圣巴巴拉的另一个教训。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w592-4. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w592. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
4
From Santa Barbara to Washington: a person's and a nation's journey toward portable health information.从圣巴巴拉到华盛顿:一个人和一个国家迈向便携式健康信息的历程。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w581-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w581. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
5
Health information exchange: 'lex parsimoniae'.健康信息交换:“简约法则”
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w595-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w595. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
6
The state of regional health information organizations: current activities and financing.区域卫生信息组织的现状:当前活动与资金筹措
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jan-Feb;27(1):w60-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.w60. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
7
Destination RHIO. As regional data networks continue to grow in number, some find financial strength.目标区域卫生信息组织。随着区域数据网络数量不断增加,一些组织发现了财务实力。
Mod Healthc. 2005 Oct 17;35(42):28, 32.
8
Health information exchange: participation by Minnesota primary care practices.健康信息交换:明尼苏达州初级保健机构的参与情况。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 12;170(7):622-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.54.
9
A tale of three cities--where RHIOS meet the NHIN.三个城市的故事——区域卫生信息组织(RHIOS)与国家卫生信息网络(NHIN)的交汇之处
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2006 Summer;20(3):63-70.
10
A survey of health information exchange organizations in the United States: implications for meaningful use.美国健康信息交换组织调查:对有意义使用的启示。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17;154(10):666-71. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-10-201105170-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
From "wading through treacle" to "making haste slowly": A comprehensive yet parsimonious model of drivers and challenges to implementing patient data sharing projects based on an EPaCCS evaluation and four pre-existing literature reviews.从“在糖浆中跋涉”到“慢中求快”:基于电子病历与社区护理系统(EPaCCS)评估及四项现有文献综述构建的关于患者数据共享项目实施的驱动因素与挑战的全面而简约的模型
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Apr 1;3(4):e0000470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000470. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries.健康信息交换状况:六个国家的比较。
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):0204279. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.020427.
3
Physician leadership and health information exchange: literature review.
医师领导力与健康信息交换:文献综述
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Aug;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100080.
4
The implications and impact of 3 approaches to health information exchange: community, enterprise, and vendor-mediated health information exchange.三种健康信息交换方式的含义及影响:社区、企业和供应商介导的健康信息交换。
Learn Health Syst. 2017 Jan 6;1(2):e10021. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10021. eCollection 2017 Apr.
5
Mind the gap: the potential of alternative health information exchange.注意差距:替代健康信息交流的潜力。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jan;25(1):32-38.
6
The relationship between hospital and ehr vendor market dynamics on health information organization presence and participation.医院与电子健康记录供应商市场动态对健康信息组织的存在和参与的关系。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 May 8;18(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0605-y.
7
Legal Barriers to the Growth of Health Information Exchange-Boulders or Pebbles?健康信息交换增长的法律障碍——巨石还是卵石?
Milbank Q. 2018 Mar;96(1):110-143. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12313.
8
Assessment of the usability and impact of the Idaho Health Data Exchange (IHDE).爱达荷州健康数据交换(IHDE)的可用性和影响评估。
J Med Syst. 2016 Apr;40(4):102. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0445-1. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
9
Assessing payer perspectives on health information exchange.评估付款人对健康信息交换的看法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):297-303. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv072. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
10
Learning from health information exchange technical architecture and implementation in seven beacon communities.从七个灯塔社区的健康信息交换技术架构与实施中学习。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 May 5;2(1):1060. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1060. eCollection 2014.