Everson Jordan
Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan.
Learn Health Syst. 2017 Jan 6;1(2):e10021. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10021. eCollection 2017 Apr.
Electronic health information exchange (HIE) is considered essential to establishing a learning health system, reducing medical errors, and improving efficiency, but establishment of widespread, high functioning HIE has been challenging. Healthcare organizations now have considerable flexibility in selecting among several HIE strategies, most prominently community HIE, enterprise HIE (led by a healthcare organization), and electronic health record vendor-mediated HIE. Each of these strategies is characterized by different conveners, capabilities, and motivations and may have different abilities to facilitate improved patient care.
I reviewed the available scholarly literature to draw conceptual distinctions between these types of HIE, to assess the current evidence on each type of HIE, and to indicate important areas of future research.
While community HIE seems to offer the most open approach to HIE allowing for high levels of connectivity, both enterprise HIE and vendor-mediated HIE face lower barriers to formation and sustainability. Most existing evidence is focused on community HIE and points towards low overall use, challenges to usability, and ambiguous impact. To better guide organizational leaders and policymakers in the expansion of beneficial HIE and anticipate future trends, future research should work to better capture the prevalence of other forms of HIE, and to adopt common methods to allow comparisons of rate of use, usability, and impact on patient care across studies and types of HIE.
Healthcare organizations' choice of HIE strategy influences the set of partners the organization is connected to and may influence the benefit that efforts supported by HIE can offer to patients. Current research is not fully capturing the diversity of approaches to HIE and their potentially varying impact on providers and patients.
电子健康信息交换(HIE)被认为对于建立学习型健康系统、减少医疗差错以及提高效率至关重要,但建立广泛且高效运行的HIE一直具有挑战性。医疗保健组织现在在几种HIE策略中进行选择时具有相当大的灵活性,最突出的是社区HIE、企业HIE(由医疗保健组织主导)以及电子健康记录供应商介导的HIE。这些策略中的每一种都具有不同的召集者、能力和动机,并且在促进改善患者护理方面可能具有不同的能力。
我查阅了现有的学术文献,以区分这些类型的HIE之间的概念差异,评估每种类型HIE的当前证据,并指出未来研究的重要领域。
虽然社区HIE似乎提供了最开放的HIE方法,允许高水平的连接,但企业HIE和供应商介导的HIE在形成和可持续性方面面临的障碍较低。现有的大多数证据都集中在社区HIE上,表明总体使用率较低、可用性面临挑战以及影响不明确。为了更好地指导组织领导者和政策制定者扩大有益的HIE并预测未来趋势,未来的研究应努力更好地掌握其他形式HIE的普遍性,并采用通用方法来比较不同研究和HIE类型之间的使用速率、可用性以及对患者护理的影响。
医疗保健组织对HIE策略的选择会影响该组织所连接的合作伙伴群体,并可能影响HIE支持的努力能够为患者带来的益处。当前的研究尚未充分涵盖HIE方法的多样性及其对提供者和患者可能产生的不同影响。