Good David M, Wirtala Matthew, McAlister Graeme C, Coon Joshua J
Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007 Nov;6(11):1942-51. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700073-MCP200. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
We performed a large scale study of electron transfer dissociation (ETD) performance, as compared with ion trap collision-activated dissociation (CAD), for peptides ranging from approximately 1000 to 5000 Da (n approximately 4000). These data indicate relatively little overlap in peptide identifications between the two methods ( approximately 12%). ETD outperformed CAD for all charge states greater than 2; however, regardless of precursor charge a linear decrease in percent fragmentation, as a function of increasing precursor m/z, was observed with ETD fragmentation. We postulate that several precursor cation attributes, including peptide length, charge distribution, and total mass, could be relevant players. To examine these parameters unique ETD-identified peptides were sorted by length, and the ratio of amino acid residues per precursor charge (residues/charge) was calculated. We observed excellent correlation between the ratio of residues/charge and percent fragmentation. For peptides of a given residue/charge ratio, there is no correlation between peptide mass and percent fragmentation; instead we conclude that the ratio of residues/charge is the main factor in determining a successful ETD outcome. As charge density decreases so does the probability of non-covalent interactions that can bind a newly formed c/z-type ion pair. Recently we have described a supplemental activation approach (ETcaD) to convert these non-dissociative electron transfer product ions to useful c- and z-type ions. Automated implementation of such methods should remove this apparent precursor m/z ceiling. Finally, we evaluated the role of ion density (both anionic and cationic) and reaction duration for an ETD experiment. These data indicate that the best performance is achieved when the ion trap is filled to its space charge limit with anionic reagents. In this largest scale study of ETD to date, ETD continues to show great promise to propel the field of proteomics and, for small- to medium-sized peptides, is highly complementary to ion trap CAD.
我们对分子量约为1000至5000道尔顿(n约为4000)的肽段进行了一项大规模研究,比较了电子转移解离(ETD)与离子阱碰撞活化解离(CAD)的性能。这些数据表明,两种方法在肽段鉴定方面的重叠相对较少(约12%)。对于所有大于2的电荷态,ETD的表现优于CAD;然而,无论前体电荷如何,随着前体m/z的增加,ETD碎片化百分比呈线性下降。我们推测,包括肽段长度、电荷分布和总质量在内的几个前体阳离子属性可能是相关因素。为了研究这些参数,将ETD鉴定出的独特肽段按长度分类,并计算每个前体电荷的氨基酸残基比率(残基/电荷)。我们观察到残基/电荷比率与碎片化百分比之间具有良好的相关性。对于给定残基/电荷比率的肽段,肽段质量与碎片化百分比之间没有相关性;相反,我们得出结论,残基/电荷比率是决定ETD成功结果的主要因素。随着电荷密度的降低,能够结合新形成的c/z型离子对的非共价相互作用的概率也会降低。最近,我们描述了一种补充激活方法(ETcaD),可将这些非解离性电子转移产物离子转化为有用的c型和z型离子。此类方法的自动化实施应能消除这一明显的前体m/z上限。最后,我们评估了离子密度(阴离子和阳离子)以及ETD实验反应持续时间的作用。这些数据表明,当离子阱用阴离子试剂填充至其空间电荷极限时,性能最佳。在迄今为止规模最大的ETD研究中,ETD继续展现出推动蛋白质组学领域发展的巨大潜力,并且对于中小型肽段而言,它与离子阱CAD具有高度互补性。