Steingart Karen R, Henry Megan, Laal Suman, Hopewell Philip C, Ramsay Andrew, Menzies Dick, Cunningham Jane, Weldingh Karin, Pai Madhukar
Division pf Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, USA.
Thorax. 2007 Oct;62(10):911-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.075754. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
Conventional diagnostic tests for tuberculosis have several limitations and are often unhelpful in establishing the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Although commercial serological antibody based tests are available, their usefulness in the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis is unknown. A systematic review was conducted to assess the accuracy of commercial serological antibody detection tests for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. In a comprehensive search, 21 studies that reported data on sensitivity and specificity for extrapulmonary tuberculosis were identified. These studies evaluated seven different commercial tests, with Anda-TB IgG accounting for 48% of the studies. The results showed that (1) all commercial tests provided highly variable estimates of sensitivity (range 0.00-1.00) and specificity (range 0.59-1.00) for all extrapulmonary sites combined; (2) the Anda-TB IgG kit showed highly variable sensitivity (range 0.26-1.00) and specificity (range 0.59-1.00) for all extrapulmonary sites combined; (3) for all tests combined, sensitivity estimates for both lymph node tuberculosis (range 0.23-1.00) and pleural tuberculosis (range 0.26-0.59) were poor and inconsistent; and (4) there were no data to determine the accuracy of the tests in children or in patients with HIV infection, the two groups for which the test would be most useful. At present, commercial antibody detection tests for extrapulmonary tuberculosis have no role in clinical care or case detection.
传统的结核病诊断测试存在若干局限性,在确立肺外结核病的诊断方面往往并无帮助。尽管有基于商业血清学抗体的检测方法,但它们在肺外结核病诊断中的效用尚不清楚。开展了一项系统评价,以评估商业血清学抗体检测试验对肺外结核病诊断的准确性。在全面检索过程中,确定了21项报告肺外结核病敏感性和特异性数据的研究。这些研究评估了七种不同的商业检测方法,其中安达结核IgG检测法占研究的48%。结果表明:(1)对于所有合并的肺外部位,所有商业检测方法的敏感性估计值(范围为0.00 - 1.00)和特异性估计值(范围为0.59 - 1.00)差异很大;(2)安达结核IgG试剂盒对于所有合并的肺外部位,敏感性(范围为0.26 - 1.00)和特异性(范围为0.59 - 1.00)差异很大;(3)对于所有检测方法综合来看,淋巴结结核(范围为0.23 - 1.00)和胸膜结核(范围为0.26 - 0.59)的敏感性估计值都很低且不一致;(4)没有数据可用于确定这些检测方法在儿童或艾滋病毒感染患者中的准确性,而这两类人群是这些检测最适用的对象。目前,用于肺外结核病的商业抗体检测试验在临床护理或病例检测中没有作用。