Vergne Sébastien, Bennetau-Pelissero Catherine, Lamothe Valérie, Chantre Philippe, Potier Mylène, Asselineau Julien, Perez Paul, Durand Marlène, Moore Nicholas, Sauvant Patrick
Arkopharma, Laboratoires Pharmaceutiques, Carros, France.
Br J Nutr. 2008 Feb;99(2):333-44. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507803953. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
Soya isoflavones, genistein and daidzein, are the focus of numerous studies investigating their potential effects on health and results remain controversial. Bioavailability is clearly a crucial factor influencing their bioefficacy and could explain these discrepancies. This study aimed at assessing: (1) the isoflavone content of sixty-nine European soya-derivative products sold on the French market; (2) the bioavailability of isoflavones comparing supplement with food. Twelve healthy volunteers were recruited in a randomized two-way crossover trial and received 35 mg isoflavones equivalent aglycone either through supplements or through cheese, both containing different patterns of isoflavone conjugates and different daidzein:genistein ratios. A specific ELISA method was used to assess the plasma and urinary concentrations of isoflavones and thus the pharmacokinetic parameters, which were then normalized to mg of each isoflavone ingested. Results showed that the normalized Cmax of daidzein (P = 0.002) and similarly the normalized AUC0 --> infinity and Cmax of genistein (P = 0.002) from soya-based capsules were higher than that from soya-based cheese. In conclusion, this work completes studies on isoflavone bioavailability and presents new data regarding isoflavone concentrations in soya-derivative products. Assuming that isoflavone conjugation patterns do not influence isoflavone bioavailability, this study shows that isoflavones contained in capsules are more bioavailable than those contained in soya-based cheese. Although the supplement is more bioavailable, the relative importance of this is difficult to interpret as there is little evidence that supplements are biologically active in human subjects to date and further studies will be necessary for this specific supplement to prove its efficacy.
大豆异黄酮,如染料木黄酮和大豆苷元,是众多研究的焦点,这些研究旨在探究它们对健康的潜在影响,但其结果仍存在争议。生物利用度显然是影响其生物功效的关键因素,并且可以解释这些差异。本研究旨在评估:(1)在法国市场上销售的69种欧洲大豆衍生产品中的异黄酮含量;(2)比较补充剂和食物中异黄酮的生物利用度。在一项随机双向交叉试验中招募了12名健康志愿者,他们通过补充剂或奶酪摄入35毫克相当于苷元的异黄酮,两者都含有不同模式的异黄酮共轭物以及不同的大豆苷元:染料木黄酮比例。使用一种特定的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)方法来评估异黄酮的血浆和尿液浓度,从而得出药代动力学参数,然后将这些参数归一化为每种摄入异黄酮的毫克数。结果表明,大豆胶囊中大豆苷元的归一化Cmax(P = 0.002),同样地,染料木黄酮的归一化AUC0至无穷大及Cmax(P = 0.002)高于大豆奶酪中的相应值。总之,这项工作完善了关于异黄酮生物利用度的研究,并提供了有关大豆衍生产品中异黄酮浓度的新数据。假设异黄酮共轭模式不影响异黄酮生物利用度,本研究表明胶囊中所含的异黄酮比大豆奶酪中所含的异黄酮生物利用度更高。尽管补充剂的生物利用度更高,但由于目前几乎没有证据表明补充剂在人体中具有生物活性,因此难以解释其相对重要性,对于这种特定的补充剂,还需要进一步研究以证明其功效。