• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首选抗高血压药物的选择:像ABCD一样简单?

Choice of first antihypertensive: simple as ABCD?

作者信息

Mahmud Azra, Feely John

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, and Trinity Centre for Health Sciences and Hypertension Clinic, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2007 Aug;20(8):923-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2007.03.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2007.03.011
PMID:17679044
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The AB/CD British Hypertension Society guidelines predict that the blood-pressure response to antihypertensive agents A (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers) or B (beta blockers) drugs is better in those aged<55 years, whereas that to agents C (calcium channel blockers) or D (diuretics) agents is better in those aged>or=55 years.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study of 175 consecutive, untreated, hypertensive whites (55% men), aged 19 to 80 years and prospectively randomized to either A/B or C/D antihypertensive agents, and in whom there was no compelling reason to choose a particular drug. Blood pressure (BP) was measured using a semiautomated device (Omron 705CM, Tokyo, Japan) at baseline and 4 weeks after therapy in a single, blind fashion.

RESULTS

There was no difference in baseline BP (mean+/-SEM, A/B, 163+/-2/97+/-1 v C/D, 163+/-2/95+/-1 mm Hg). Whereas the A/B drugs were more effective in younger than older patients, expressed as percentage of reduction (13%+/-1%/12%+/-1% v 8.5%+/-1%/7%+/-1%, P<.01), as absolute reduction, or by classification of mean+/-SEM blood pressure into stages of hypertension, the C/D drugs were no more effective than A/B drugs in those aged>55 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The arbitrary choice of age 55 years to predict the response to antihypertensive agents in a white population is not supported by our data. A prospective, multicenter study is required to underpin guideline recommendations in relation to using age as a determinant for choice of a particular antihypertensive drug in defined hypertensive populations.

摘要

背景

英国高血压学会的AB/CD指南预测,年龄<55岁的患者对抗高血压药物A(血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂)或B(β受体阻滞剂)的血压反应更佳,而年龄≥55岁的患者对药物C(钙通道阻滞剂)或D(利尿剂)的反应更佳。

方法

我们对175例未经治疗的连续性高血压白人(55%为男性)进行了一项队列研究,这些患者年龄在19至80岁之间,前瞻性地随机分为A/B或C/D抗高血压药物治疗组,且没有选择特定药物的紧迫理由。在基线期和治疗4周后,采用半自动设备(日本东京欧姆龙705CM)以单盲方式测量血压(BP)。

结果

基线血压无差异(均值±标准误,A/B组为163±2/97±1,C/D组为163±2/95±1 mmHg)。A/B类药物在年轻患者中比老年患者更有效,以降低百分比表示(13%±1%/12%±1%对8.5%±1%/7%±1%,P<0.01),以绝对降低值表示,或以均值±标准误血压分类为高血压阶段表示,C/D类药物在年龄>55岁的患者中并不比A/B类药物更有效。

结论

我们的数据不支持以55岁作为预测白人人群对抗高血压药物反应的随意选择。需要进行一项前瞻性、多中心研究,以支持在特定高血压人群中使用年龄作为选择特定抗高血压药物的决定因素的指南建议。

相似文献

1
Choice of first antihypertensive: simple as ABCD?首选抗高血压药物的选择:像ABCD一样简单?
Am J Hypertens. 2007 Aug;20(8):923-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2007.03.011.
2
A 26-week, prospective, open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter study to evaluate the effect of an escalating-dose regimen of trandolapril on change in blood pressure in treatment-naive and concurrently treated adult hypertensive subjects (TRAIL).一项为期26周的前瞻性、开放标签、非对照、多中心研究,旨在评估逐步递增剂量的群多普利方案对初治和同时接受治疗的成年高血压受试者血压变化的影响(TRAIL研究)。
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):305-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.016.
3
An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.氨氯地平/雷米普利联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗高血压的18周前瞻性随机双盲多中心研究:氨氯地平/雷米普利联合治疗评估(ATAR)研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Sep;30(9):1618-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.008.
4
The effects of amlodipine and enalapril on renal function in adults with hypertension and nondiabetic nephropathies: a 3-year, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.氨氯地平和依那普利对患有高血压和非糖尿病肾病的成年人肾功能的影响:一项为期3年的随机、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Mar;30(3):482-98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.03.006.
5
Blood pressure and serum potassium levels in hypertensive patients receiving or not receiving antihypertensive treatment.接受或未接受抗高血压治疗的高血压患者的血压和血清钾水平。
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2007 Nov;29(8):563-73. doi: 10.1080/10641960701744103.
6
Ambulatory blood pressure-lowering effects of valsartan and enalapril after a missed dose in previously untreated patients with hypertension: a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point trial.缬沙坦和依那普利对既往未治疗的高血压患者漏服一剂药物后的动态血压降低作用:一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲法终点试验。
Clin Ther. 2008 Jan;30(1):108-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.01.012.
7
Results of a phase III, 8-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial to assess the effects of amlodipine camsylate versus amlodipine besylate in Korean adults with mild to moderate hypertension.一项三期、为期8周、多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组临床试验的结果,该试验旨在评估坎地沙坦酯与苯磺酸氨氯地平对韩国轻至中度高血压成年人的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):1924-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.018.
8
Drug-gene interaction between the insertion/deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and antihypertensive therapy.血管紧张素转换酶基因插入/缺失多态性与降压治疗之间的药物-基因相互作用。
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Feb;40(2):212-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G316. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
9
[Reasons for not intensifying antihypertensive treatment to diabetes in some regions of China].[中国部分地区未对糖尿病患者强化降压治疗的原因]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Jan 22;88(4):240-4.
10
Efficacy and tolerability of two formulations of ramipril in Korean adults with mild to moderate essential hypertension: an 8-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group noninferiority trial.雷米普利两种制剂对韩国轻至中度原发性高血压成人患者的疗效和耐受性:一项为期8周的多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、平行组非劣效性试验。
Clin Ther. 2009 May;31(5):988-98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal dynamic treatment regime estimation using information extraction from unstructured clinical text.利用从非结构化临床文本中提取的信息进行最优动态治疗方案估计。
Biom J. 2022 Apr;64(4):805-817. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100077. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
2
First line drug treatment for hypertension and reductions in blood pressure according to age and ethnicity: cohort study in UK primary care.一线药物治疗高血压以及根据年龄和种族降低血压:英国初级保健中的队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Nov 18;371:m4080. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4080.
3
Hypertension pharmacogenomics: in search of personalized treatment approaches.
高血压药物基因组学:探寻个性化治疗方法。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016 Feb;12(2):110-22. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2015.176. Epub 2015 Nov 23.