Felland Laurie, Draper Debra, Liebhaber Allison
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2007 Jul(113):1-6.
As Massachusetts' landmark effort to reach nearly universal health coverage unfolds, the state is now focusing on employers to take steps to increase coverage. All employers--except firms with fewer than 11 workers--face new requirements under the 2006 law, including establishing Section 125, or cafeteria, plans to allow workers to purchase insurance with pre-tax dollars and paying a $295 annual fee if they do not make a "fair and reasonable" contribution to the cost of workers' coverage. Through interviews with Massachusetts health care leaders (see Data Source), the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC) examined how the law is likely to affect employer decisions to offer health insurance to workers and employee decisions to purchase coverage. Market observers believe many small firms may be unaware of specific requirements and that some could prove onerous. Moreover, the largest impact on small employers may come from the individual mandate for all residents to have a minimum level of health insurance. This mandate may add costs for firms if more workers take up coverage offers, seek more generous coverage or pressure employers to offer coverage. Despite reform of the individual and small group markets, including development of new insurance products, concerns remain about the affordability of coverage and the ability to stem rising health care costs.
随着马萨诸塞州为实现近乎全民医保覆盖的具有里程碑意义的努力逐步展开,该州目前正聚焦于雇主采取措施来增加医保覆盖范围。所有雇主——除了员工少于11人的公司——都面临2006年法律规定的新要求,包括设立第125节计划或自助餐厅计划,允许员工用税前收入购买保险,如果他们不为员工医保费用做出“公平合理”的贡献,则需支付每年295美元的费用。通过对马萨诸塞州医疗保健领域领导者的访谈(见数据源),医疗系统变革研究中心(HSC)研究了该法律可能如何影响雇主为员工提供医疗保险的决策以及员工购买医保的决策。市场观察人士认为,许多小公司可能不了解具体要求,而且有些要求可能会很繁重。此外,对小雇主的最大影响可能来自要求所有居民都拥有最低水平医疗保险的个人强制参保规定。如果更多员工接受医保福利、寻求更慷慨的医保待遇或向雇主施压要求提供医保,这项强制参保规定可能会给公司增加成本。尽管对个人和小团体市场进行了改革,包括开发新的保险产品,但人们仍对医保的可负担性以及控制不断上涨的医疗保健成本的能力感到担忧。