Biel Matthew G, Peselow Eric, Mulcare Loretta, Case Brady G, Fieve Ron
Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Bipolar Disord. 2007 Aug;9(5):435-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00389.x.
Lithium's efficacy in prophylaxis of mood episodes in bipolar disorder (BD) is well established in the clinical trial setting, but may be less robust in routine clinical practice. We compared illness recurrence in bipolar patients naturalistically continued on or discontinued from lithium after an extended period of clinical stability on lithium monotherapy, and evaluated other potential risk factors for relapse.
We followed 213 patients who were stable for 2 years on lithium monotherapy following resolution of acute symptoms marking their last manic episode. Based upon patient preference and clinical judgment, 159 patients were continued on lithium monotherapy and 54 patients were slowly discontinued. Survival differences between the continued and discontinued groups were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method, and risk factors for relapse were evaluated in Cox proportional hazards regression.
Patients continued on lithium prophylaxis experienced risk of recurrence equivalent to a third of that suffered by discontinued patients during the first year of treatment (0.15 versus 0.45), and significant survival differences persisted throughout follow-up. Median survival time to illness recurrence for patients continued on lithium was 7.33 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.67-9.67]; that for patients discontinued from lithium was 1.33 years (95% CI 0.33-2.33). After controlling for all significant covariates, lithium discontinuation was associated with a hazard ratio of 4.85. Inter-episode manic and depressive symptoms conferred increased risk for subsequent recurrence of illness in both groups, while lower lithium levels recorded during the two years of clinical stability preceding study onset were protective.
Despite considerable rates of illness recurrence in both groups, those who continued on lithium sustained markedly lower rates of recurrence over a lengthy follow-up period. Lithium discontinuation in BD after successful maintenance monotherapy is not advisable. If discontinuation is considered, lithium levels previously required to maintain clinical stability, and breakthrough or residual mood symptoms experienced during remission, should inform clinical decision making.
锂盐在双相情感障碍(BD)心境发作预防中的疗效在临床试验中已得到充分证实,但在常规临床实践中可能效果欠佳。我们比较了在接受锂盐单药治疗并长期保持临床稳定后,自然继续使用或停用锂盐的双相情感障碍患者的疾病复发情况,并评估了其他潜在的复发风险因素。
我们对213例患者进行了随访,这些患者在其最后一次躁狂发作的急性症状缓解后,接受锂盐单药治疗且病情稳定达2年。根据患者偏好和临床判断,159例患者继续接受锂盐单药治疗,54例患者缓慢停药。使用Kaplan-Meier乘积限法评估继续治疗组和停药组之间的生存差异,并在Cox比例风险回归中评估复发的风险因素。
继续接受锂盐预防治疗的患者在治疗的第一年复发风险相当于停药患者的三分之一(0.15对0.45),且在整个随访期间均存在显著的生存差异。继续使用锂盐的患者疾病复发的中位生存时间为7.33年[95%置信区间(CI)5.67 - 9.67];停药患者为1.33年(95%CI 0.33 - 2.33)。在控制所有显著的协变量后,停用锂盐与风险比4.85相关。两组发作间期的躁狂和抑郁症状都会增加后续疾病复发的风险,而在研究开始前两年临床稳定期记录的较低锂盐水平具有保护作用。
尽管两组的疾病复发率都相当高,但在长期随访中,继续使用锂盐的患者复发率明显较低。双相情感障碍患者在成功进行维持性单药治疗后不宜停用锂盐。如果考虑停药,之前维持临床稳定所需的锂盐水平以及缓解期出现的突破性或残留心境症状,应作为临床决策的依据。