Fagiolini Andrea, Frank Ellen, Rucci Paola, Cassano Giovanni B, Turkin Scott, Kupfer David J
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Bipolar Disord. 2007 Aug;9(5):462-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00443.x.
Latent class analysis of demographic and clinical variables can help identify subtypes of patients with bipolar disorder type I (BD I). Classification of patients into clinically relevant and homogeneous subtypes may have implications for further research. We examine the structure of mood and anxiety spectrum features in patients with BD I to identify subtypes with similar profiles.
Adult patients diagnosed with BD I, who were also participants in the Bipolar Disorder Center for Pennsylvanians (BDCP) Study, were followed for a median time of 448 days. Data from self-report instruments of BD I patients were used to derive dichotomous indicators of four spectrum conditions. Latent class analysis was applied to these indicators. Demographic and clinical variables were used as external validators of the classes.
A 3-class solution provided a satisfactory data fit and outlined three classes of subjects. Members of the three groups differed in terms of demographic and clinical variables, such as gender, age of onset, mean Clinical Global Impression (CGI) depressive ratings and overall CGI ratings at entry, weighted mean CGI ratings for the period between the first and last evaluation in the BDCP Study and mean Global Assessment of Functioning scores at entry and during the BDCP Study.
We found substantial clinical heterogeneity among individuals with BD I and found that the levels of lifetime depressive, manic, panic-agoraphobic, and obsessive-compulsive spectrum symptoms identify three distinct subtypes characterized by differences in demographic and clinical variables. These results may have implications for research on the neurobiology, genetics, and treatment of BD I.
对人口统计学和临床变量进行潜在类别分析有助于识别I型双相情感障碍(BD I)患者的亚型。将患者分类为具有临床相关性且同质的亚型可能对进一步研究有影响。我们研究BD I患者的情绪和焦虑谱特征结构,以识别具有相似特征的亚型。
诊断为BD I的成年患者同时也是宾夕法尼亚双相情感障碍中心(BDCP)研究的参与者,随访时间中位数为448天。BD I患者自我报告工具的数据用于得出四种谱状疾病的二分指标。对这些指标应用潜在类别分析。人口统计学和临床变量用作类别的外部验证指标。
一个3类别解决方案提供了令人满意的数据拟合,并勾勒出三类受试者。三组成员在人口统计学和临床变量方面存在差异,如性别、发病年龄、入组时临床总体印象(CGI)抑郁评分和总体CGI评分、BDCP研究中首次评估与末次评估之间时间段的加权平均CGI评分以及入组时和BDCP研究期间的功能总体评估平均得分。
我们发现BD I患者个体之间存在显著的临床异质性,并且发现终生抑郁、躁狂、惊恐 - 广场恐怖和强迫谱症状水平识别出三种不同的亚型,其特征在于人口统计学和临床变量的差异。这些结果可能对BD I的神经生物学、遗传学和治疗研究有影响。