Thompson Jill M, Gray John M, Hughes John H, Watson Stuart, Young Allan H, Ferrier I Nicol
School of Neurology, Neurobiology and Psychiatry, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Bipolar Disord. 2007 Aug;9(5):478-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00470.x.
Converging evidence suggests that patients with remitted bipolar disorder (BD) have a persistent cognitive deficit in the executive control of working memory (WM). However, the component operations that contribute to this deficit remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to further profile the nature and specificity of WM impairment in euthymic BD.
Fifty DSM-IV-confirmed patients with euthymic BD and demographically matched controls completed a modified version of the Self-Ordered Pointing Task (SOPT) and the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery Pattern Recognition Test along with traditional executive and WM tasks [Stroop, initial letter Verbal Fluency (FAS), Trail-Making, Digits Forwards and Backwards]. Prospective clinical ratings over one month prior to testing confirmed that patients were euthymic at test. Absence of basal hypercortisolaemia was confirmed by serial saliva sampling.
Error analysis revealed that whilst patients made more errors on the SOPT overall, they were no more likely to perseverate than controls. Patients' erroneous responses did not proliferate across trials, suggesting that proactive interference did not contribute to their poor performance, but serial position effects were evident where patients' errors clustered towards the end of a trial. No differences were found on the recognition memory test, in WM capacity, or on two of the three traditional executive procedures (FAS and Trail-Making). However, patients' Digits Backwards was impaired.
These data suggest that patients with BD have a deficit in their ability to monitor the contents of WM. This deficit is not an epiphenomenon of mood, but may be due to enduring brain dysfunction, integral to bipolar illness.
越来越多的证据表明,双相情感障碍(BD)缓解期患者在工作记忆(WM)的执行控制方面存在持续的认知缺陷。然而,导致这种缺陷的具体组成操作仍不清楚。本研究的目的是进一步剖析心境正常的双相情感障碍患者工作记忆损害的性质和特异性。
50名经《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)确诊的心境正常的双相情感障碍患者以及人口统计学匹配的对照组完成了改良版的自我排序指向任务(SOPT)和剑桥神经心理测试自动成套模式识别测试,同时还完成了传统的执行功能和工作记忆任务[斯特鲁普测试、首字母言语流畅性测试(FAS)、连线测试、顺背和倒背数字测试]。测试前一个月的前瞻性临床评分证实患者在测试时心境正常。通过连续唾液采样确认不存在基础高皮质醇血症。
错误分析显示,虽然患者在SOPT上总体错误更多,但他们与对照组相比并不更倾向于持续性错误。患者的错误反应在各试验中并未增多,这表明前摄干扰并非导致其表现不佳的原因,但存在系列位置效应,即患者的错误集中在试验末尾。在识别记忆测试、工作记忆容量或三项传统执行功能测试中的两项(FAS和连线测试)上未发现差异。然而,患者的倒背数字测试表现受损。
这些数据表明,双相情感障碍患者在监测工作记忆内容的能力方面存在缺陷。这种缺陷并非情绪的附带现象,而可能是由于双相情感障碍所固有的持久脑功能障碍所致。