Golub Sarit A, Rosenthal Lisa, Cohen Daniel E, Mayer Kenneth H
Queens College of the City University of New York, 65-30 Kissena Boulevard, Flushing, NY 11367, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2008 Nov;12(6):852-9. doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9286-8. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
Men who have sex with men (MSM) receiving non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (NPEP) to prevent HIV transmission completed interview-assisted questionnaires regarding high-risk behavior in the 6 months prior to NPEP and during the 28-day NPEP period. 21% of participants reported unprotected sex during NPEP, and 11% reported unprotected sex with HIV-positive or HIV status unknown partners. In univariate analyses, unprotected sex during NPEP was associated with prevention fatigue, depression, loss of loved ones to HIV, and a history of engagement with HIV/AIDS service organizations, e.g., receiving services from an HIV-related agency, donating money to HIV-related causes, and reading HIV-related magazines. Logistic regression analyses revealed that the strongest predictor of risk-taking during NPEP was HIV engagement. These data underscore the importance of combining chemoprophylaxis with behavioral interventions that support risk-reduction. Such interventions should not assume that those most engaged with HIV/AIDS service organizations are less likely to engage in risk behavior.
接受非职业性暴露后预防(NPEP)以预防艾滋病毒传播的男男性行为者(MSM)完成了关于NPEP前6个月以及28天NPEP期间高危行为的访谈辅助问卷。21%的参与者报告在NPEP期间有未采取保护措施的性行为,11%报告与艾滋病毒呈阳性或艾滋病毒感染状况不明的伴侣发生过未采取保护措施的性行为。在单变量分析中,NPEP期间未采取保护措施的性行为与预防疲劳、抑郁、因艾滋病毒失去亲人以及曾与艾滋病毒/艾滋病服务组织接触的经历有关,例如,接受与艾滋病毒相关机构的服务、向与艾滋病毒相关的事业捐款以及阅读与艾滋病毒相关的杂志。逻辑回归分析显示,NPEP期间冒险行为的最强预测因素是与艾滋病毒相关的接触。这些数据强调了将化学预防与支持降低风险的行为干预相结合的重要性。此类干预不应假定那些与艾滋病毒/艾滋病服务组织接触最多的人从事风险行为的可能性较小。