• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Trends in HIV Risk, Testing, and Treatment among MSM in Chicago 2004-2014: Implications for HIV Elimination Planning.2004-2014 年芝加哥男男性行为者中 HIV 风险、检测和治疗趋势:对 HIV 消除规划的启示。
J Urban Health. 2017 Oct;94(5):699-709. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0175-9.
2
Differences in Awareness of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis and Post-exposure Prophylaxis Among Groups At-Risk for HIV in New York State: New York City and Long Island, NY, 2011-2013.纽约州艾滋病高危人群中暴露前预防和暴露后预防知晓情况的差异:纽约市和纽约州长岛,2011 - 2013年
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Jul 1;75 Suppl 3:S383-S391. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001415.
3
Combination prevention and HIV: a cross-sectional community survey of gay and bisexual men in London, October to December 2016.联合预防和艾滋病毒:2016 年 10 月至 12 月伦敦男同性恋和双性恋男性的横断面社区调查。
Euro Surveill. 2019 Jun;24(25). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.25.1800312.
4
[Acceptance of pre-exposure prophylaxis and post-exposure prophylaxis against HIV and related factors in men who have sex with men in Shandong Province].[山东省男男性行为人群中艾滋病病毒暴露前预防和暴露后预防的接受情况及相关因素]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 10;44(9):1352-1357. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20230202-00052.
5
Anti-retroviral Therapy Based HIV Prevention Among a Sample of Men Who Have Sex with Men in Cape Town, South Africa: Use of Post-exposure Prophylaxis and Knowledge on Pre-exposure Prophylaxis.南非开普敦男男性行为者样本中基于抗逆转录病毒疗法的HIV预防:暴露后预防的使用情况及暴露前预防知识
AIDS Behav. 2016 Dec;20(Suppl 3):357-364. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1536-1.
6
[HIV infection rate, high-risk behavior and pre-exposure prophylaxis/post-exposure prophylaxis in men who have sex with men in Beijing].[北京男男性行为人群的HIV感染率、高危行为及暴露前/后预防]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 10;44(9):1390-1396. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20230308-00133.
7
Does HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Modify the Effect of Partnership Characteristics on Condom Use? A Cross-Sectional Study of Sexual Partnerships Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in San Francisco, California.HIV 暴露前预防是否会改变伴侣特征对 condom 使用的影响?加利福尼亚州旧金山男男性行为者性伴侣关系的横断面研究。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2019 Apr;33(4):167-174. doi: 10.1089/apc.2018.0179.
8
Correlates of Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Use among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in Los Angeles, California.加利福尼亚州洛杉矶男男性行为者(MSM)中使用暴露前预防(PrEP)的相关因素。
J Urban Health. 2017 Oct;94(5):710-715. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0172-z.
9
Changes in recreational drug use, drug use associated with chemsex, and HIV-related behaviours, among HIV-negative men who have sex with men in London and Brighton, 2013-2016.伦敦和布赖顿的男男性行为者中,2013-2016 年间,娱乐性毒品使用、与化学性行为相关的毒品使用以及与 HIV 相关行为的变化,在 HIV 阴性男性中。
Sex Transm Infect. 2018 Nov;94(7):494-501. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053439. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
10
Characteristics of men who have sex with men in southern Africa who seek sex online: a cross-sectional study.南部非洲通过网络寻求性伴侣的男男性行为者的特征:一项横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 25;17(5):e129. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4230.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk and Protective Profile of Men Who Have Sex With Men Using Mobile Voluntary HIV Counseling and Testing: Latent Class Analysis.男男性行为者使用移动自愿艾滋病毒咨询和检测的风险和保护因素:潜在类别分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Feb 16;9:e43394. doi: 10.2196/43394.
2
HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Among Substance-Using Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents and Young Adults: Baseline Survey of a Randomized Controlled Trial.HIV 和性传播感染检测在物质使用的性少数和性别少数青少年和年轻人中:一项随机对照试验的基线调查。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jul 1;8(7):e30944. doi: 10.2196/30944.
3
Awareness and Use of Post-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.男男性行为者中预防艾滋病毒暴露后预防的知晓率与使用率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 10;8:783626. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.783626. eCollection 2021.
4
Factors associated with barriers to engagement in HIV-prevention care among sexual minority men.与性少数男性参与 HIV 预防护理障碍相关的因素。
J Behav Med. 2021 Dec;44(6):784-793. doi: 10.1007/s10865-021-00230-0. Epub 2021 May 16.
5
Potential Contributions of Clinical and Community Testing in Identifying Persons with Undiagnosed HIV Infection in the United States.美国临床和社区检测在发现未诊断的 HIV 感染者方面的潜在贡献。
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:2325958220950902. doi: 10.1177/2325958220950902.
6
Next-Wave HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Implementation for Gay and Bisexual Men.为男同性恋和双性恋男性实施下一代 HIV 暴露前预防。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2019 Jun;33(6):253-261. doi: 10.1089/apc.2018.0290. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Are HIV Seroconversions Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men Associated With Social Network Proximity to Recently or Long-Term HIV-Infected Individuals?男男性行为者中的 HIV 血清转换是否与最近或长期感染 HIV 的个体的社交网络接近有关?
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Feb 1;77(2):128-134. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001586.

本文引用的文献

1
HIV-1 Infection and Transmission Networks of Younger People in Chicago, Illinois, 2005-2011.2005 - 2011年伊利诺伊州芝加哥市年轻人的HIV - 1感染与传播网络
Public Health Rep. 2017 Jan-Feb;132(1):48-55. doi: 10.1177/0033354916679988. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
2
Age-Specific Race and Ethnicity Disparities in HIV Infection and Awareness Among Men Who Have Sex With Men--20 US Cities, 2008-2014.2008 - 2014年美国20个城市男男性行为者中按年龄划分的艾滋病毒感染及知晓情况的种族和族裔差异
J Infect Dis. 2016 Mar 1;213(5):776-83. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv500. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
3
Minimal Awareness and Stalled Uptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among at Risk, HIV-Negative, Black Men Who Have Sex with Men.处于风险中的HIV阴性黑人男同性恋者对暴露前预防(PrEP)的知晓度极低且接受率停滞不前。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015 Aug;29(8):423-9. doi: 10.1089/apc.2014.0303. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
4
Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.《2015年性传播疾病治疗指南》
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015 Jun 5;64(RR-03):1-137.
5
Willingness to Take PrEP and Potential for Risk Compensation Among Highly Sexually Active Gay and Bisexual Men.性活跃的男同性恋者和双性恋者服用暴露前预防药物的意愿及风险代偿可能性
AIDS Behav. 2015 Dec;19(12):2234-44. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1030-1.
6
Transmission clustering among newly diagnosed HIV patients in Chicago, 2008 to 2011: using phylogenetics to expand knowledge of regional HIV transmission patterns.2008年至2011年芝加哥新诊断艾滋病毒患者中的传播聚类:利用系统发育学扩展对区域艾滋病毒传播模式的认识。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015 Jan 1;68(1):46-54. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000404.
7
Understanding racial HIV/STI disparities in black and white men who have sex with men: a multilevel approach.了解男男性行为者中黑人和白人之间的艾滋病毒/性传播感染差异:一种多层次方法。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 7;9(3):e90514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090514. eCollection 2014.
8
No evidence of sexual risk compensation in the iPrEx trial of daily oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis.在每日口服 HIV 暴露前预防的 iPrEx 试验中没有发现性风险补偿的证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e81997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081997. eCollection 2013.
9
Network mixing and network influences most linked to HIV infection and risk behavior in the HIV epidemic among black men who have sex with men.网络混合和网络影响与黑人男男性行为者中的 HIV 感染和风险行为最相关。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jan;103(1):e28-36. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301003. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
10
Estimating the population size of men who have sex with men in the United States to obtain HIV and syphilis rates.估算美国男男性行为者的人口规模以获取艾滋病毒和梅毒感染率。
Open AIDS J. 2012;6:98-107. doi: 10.2174/1874613601206010098. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

2004-2014 年芝加哥男男性行为者中 HIV 风险、检测和治疗趋势:对 HIV 消除规划的启示。

Trends in HIV Risk, Testing, and Treatment among MSM in Chicago 2004-2014: Implications for HIV Elimination Planning.

机构信息

Chicago Center for HIV Elimination, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 2017 Oct;94(5):699-709. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0175-9.

DOI:10.1007/s11524-017-0175-9
PMID:28631059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5610127/
Abstract

Men who have sex with men (MSM) in the USA continue to have high rates of HIV infection. Increasingly, in addition to behavioral factors, biomedical interventions have been found to play important roles in HIV prevention. In this analysis, we used four waves of cross-sectional data (2004, 2008, 2011, and 2014) from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System (NHBS) to examine trends in key behaviors and biomedical interventions among MSM in Chicago (N = 3298). Logistic regression was used to determine changes in behaviors and use of biomedical interventions. Condomless sex increased significantly in waves 3 and 4, compared to wave 1: wave 3 (AOR = 2.07; 95% CI 1.53, 2.78) and wave 4 (AOR = 2.19; 95% CI 1.62, 2.96). Compared to those aged 18-24, older participants were significantly less likely to be routinely tested for HIV: 30-39 (AOR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.48, 0.83), 40-49 (AOR = 0.40; 95% CI 0.29, 0.55), and >50 (AOR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.18, 0.43). Awareness of both post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP)(​AOR = 3.13; 95% CI 1.22, 8.03) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)(​AOR = 10.02; 95% CI 2.95, 34.01) increased significantly in wave 4, compared to wave 3. These results suggest a potential increase in HIV rates among men with main and casual partners and should be monitored closely as PrEP becomes more widespread among MSM of all races and ethnicities in Chicago. This study also suggests that further analyses of the barriers to PEP and PreP uptake among high-risk populations are necessary.

摘要

美国男男性行为者(MSM)的 HIV 感染率仍然很高。越来越多的研究发现,除了行为因素外,生物医学干预措施在 HIV 预防中也发挥着重要作用。在这项分析中,我们使用了来自国家 HIV 行为监测系统(NHBS)的四个横断面数据(2004 年、2008 年、2011 年和 2014 年),以研究芝加哥 MSM 的关键行为和生物医学干预措施的趋势(N=3298)。我们使用逻辑回归来确定行为和生物医学干预措施的变化。与第 1 波相比,第 3 波和第 4 波中无保护性行为显著增加:第 3 波(AOR=2.07;95%CI 1.53,2.78)和第 4 波(AOR=2.19;95%CI 1.62,2.96)。与 18-24 岁的参与者相比,年龄较大的参与者接受 HIV 常规检测的可能性显著降低:30-39 岁(AOR=0.63;95%CI 0.48,0.83)、40-49 岁(AOR=0.40;95%CI 0.29,0.55)和>50 岁(AOR=0.28;95%CI 0.18,0.43)。与第 3 波相比,第 4 波中人们对暴露后预防(PEP)(AOR=3.13;95%CI 1.22,8.03)和暴露前预防(PrEP)(AOR=10.02;95%CI 2.95,34.01)的知晓率显著增加。这些结果表明,与主要和偶然伴侣发生性行为的男性 HIV 感染率可能会增加,应密切监测,因为在芝加哥所有种族和族裔的 MSM 中,PrEP 的使用越来越广泛。这项研究还表明,有必要进一步分析高危人群中 PEP 和 PreP 采用的障碍。